Cargando…
Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation
The immunoproteasome (iP) has been proposed to perform specialized roles in MHC class I antigen presentation, cytokine modulation, and T cell differentiation and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune disorders and cancer. However, divergence in function between the iP and the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29182146 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27364 |
_version_ | 1783282018028617728 |
---|---|
author | Winter, Michael B La Greca, Florencia Arastu-Kapur, Shirin Caiazza, Francesco Cimermancic, Peter Buchholz, Tonia J Anderl, Janet L Ravalin, Matthew Bohn, Markus F Sali, Andrej O'Donoghue, Anthony J Craik, Charles S |
author_facet | Winter, Michael B La Greca, Florencia Arastu-Kapur, Shirin Caiazza, Francesco Cimermancic, Peter Buchholz, Tonia J Anderl, Janet L Ravalin, Matthew Bohn, Markus F Sali, Andrej O'Donoghue, Anthony J Craik, Charles S |
author_sort | Winter, Michael B |
collection | PubMed |
description | The immunoproteasome (iP) has been proposed to perform specialized roles in MHC class I antigen presentation, cytokine modulation, and T cell differentiation and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune disorders and cancer. However, divergence in function between the iP and the constitutive proteasome (cP) has been unclear. A global peptide library-based screening strategy revealed that the proteasomes have overlapping but distinct substrate specificities. Differing iP specificity alters the quantity of production of certain MHC I epitopes but does not appear to be preferentially suited for antigen presentation. Furthermore, iP specificity was found to have likely arisen through genetic drift from the ancestral cP. Specificity differences were exploited to develop isoform-selective substrates. Cellular profiling using these substrates revealed that divergence in regulation of the iP balances its relative contribution to proteasome capacity in immune cells, resulting in selective recovery from inhibition. These findings have implications for iP-targeted therapeutic development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5705213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57052132017-11-29 Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation Winter, Michael B La Greca, Florencia Arastu-Kapur, Shirin Caiazza, Francesco Cimermancic, Peter Buchholz, Tonia J Anderl, Janet L Ravalin, Matthew Bohn, Markus F Sali, Andrej O'Donoghue, Anthony J Craik, Charles S eLife Biochemistry and Chemical Biology The immunoproteasome (iP) has been proposed to perform specialized roles in MHC class I antigen presentation, cytokine modulation, and T cell differentiation and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune disorders and cancer. However, divergence in function between the iP and the constitutive proteasome (cP) has been unclear. A global peptide library-based screening strategy revealed that the proteasomes have overlapping but distinct substrate specificities. Differing iP specificity alters the quantity of production of certain MHC I epitopes but does not appear to be preferentially suited for antigen presentation. Furthermore, iP specificity was found to have likely arisen through genetic drift from the ancestral cP. Specificity differences were exploited to develop isoform-selective substrates. Cellular profiling using these substrates revealed that divergence in regulation of the iP balances its relative contribution to proteasome capacity in immune cells, resulting in selective recovery from inhibition. These findings have implications for iP-targeted therapeutic development. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5705213/ /pubmed/29182146 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27364 Text en © 2017, Winter et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biochemistry and Chemical Biology Winter, Michael B La Greca, Florencia Arastu-Kapur, Shirin Caiazza, Francesco Cimermancic, Peter Buchholz, Tonia J Anderl, Janet L Ravalin, Matthew Bohn, Markus F Sali, Andrej O'Donoghue, Anthony J Craik, Charles S Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation |
title | Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation |
title_full | Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation |
title_fullStr | Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation |
title_short | Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation |
title_sort | immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation |
topic | Biochemistry and Chemical Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29182146 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wintermichaelb immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT lagrecaflorencia immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT arastukapurshirin immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT caiazzafrancesco immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT cimermancicpeter immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT buchholztoniaj immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT anderljanetl immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT ravalinmatthew immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT bohnmarkusf immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT saliandrej immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT odonoghueanthonyj immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation AT craikcharless immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation |