Cargando…

Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation

The immunoproteasome (iP) has been proposed to perform specialized roles in MHC class I antigen presentation, cytokine modulation, and T cell differentiation and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune disorders and cancer. However, divergence in function between the iP and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, Michael B, La Greca, Florencia, Arastu-Kapur, Shirin, Caiazza, Francesco, Cimermancic, Peter, Buchholz, Tonia J, Anderl, Janet L, Ravalin, Matthew, Bohn, Markus F, Sali, Andrej, O'Donoghue, Anthony J, Craik, Charles S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29182146
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27364
_version_ 1783282018028617728
author Winter, Michael B
La Greca, Florencia
Arastu-Kapur, Shirin
Caiazza, Francesco
Cimermancic, Peter
Buchholz, Tonia J
Anderl, Janet L
Ravalin, Matthew
Bohn, Markus F
Sali, Andrej
O'Donoghue, Anthony J
Craik, Charles S
author_facet Winter, Michael B
La Greca, Florencia
Arastu-Kapur, Shirin
Caiazza, Francesco
Cimermancic, Peter
Buchholz, Tonia J
Anderl, Janet L
Ravalin, Matthew
Bohn, Markus F
Sali, Andrej
O'Donoghue, Anthony J
Craik, Charles S
author_sort Winter, Michael B
collection PubMed
description The immunoproteasome (iP) has been proposed to perform specialized roles in MHC class I antigen presentation, cytokine modulation, and T cell differentiation and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune disorders and cancer. However, divergence in function between the iP and the constitutive proteasome (cP) has been unclear. A global peptide library-based screening strategy revealed that the proteasomes have overlapping but distinct substrate specificities. Differing iP specificity alters the quantity of production of certain MHC I epitopes but does not appear to be preferentially suited for antigen presentation. Furthermore, iP specificity was found to have likely arisen through genetic drift from the ancestral cP. Specificity differences were exploited to develop isoform-selective substrates. Cellular profiling using these substrates revealed that divergence in regulation of the iP balances its relative contribution to proteasome capacity in immune cells, resulting in selective recovery from inhibition. These findings have implications for iP-targeted therapeutic development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5705213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57052132017-11-29 Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation Winter, Michael B La Greca, Florencia Arastu-Kapur, Shirin Caiazza, Francesco Cimermancic, Peter Buchholz, Tonia J Anderl, Janet L Ravalin, Matthew Bohn, Markus F Sali, Andrej O'Donoghue, Anthony J Craik, Charles S eLife Biochemistry and Chemical Biology The immunoproteasome (iP) has been proposed to perform specialized roles in MHC class I antigen presentation, cytokine modulation, and T cell differentiation and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune disorders and cancer. However, divergence in function between the iP and the constitutive proteasome (cP) has been unclear. A global peptide library-based screening strategy revealed that the proteasomes have overlapping but distinct substrate specificities. Differing iP specificity alters the quantity of production of certain MHC I epitopes but does not appear to be preferentially suited for antigen presentation. Furthermore, iP specificity was found to have likely arisen through genetic drift from the ancestral cP. Specificity differences were exploited to develop isoform-selective substrates. Cellular profiling using these substrates revealed that divergence in regulation of the iP balances its relative contribution to proteasome capacity in immune cells, resulting in selective recovery from inhibition. These findings have implications for iP-targeted therapeutic development. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5705213/ /pubmed/29182146 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27364 Text en © 2017, Winter et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
Winter, Michael B
La Greca, Florencia
Arastu-Kapur, Shirin
Caiazza, Francesco
Cimermancic, Peter
Buchholz, Tonia J
Anderl, Janet L
Ravalin, Matthew
Bohn, Markus F
Sali, Andrej
O'Donoghue, Anthony J
Craik, Charles S
Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation
title Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation
title_full Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation
title_fullStr Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation
title_full_unstemmed Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation
title_short Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation
title_sort immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation
topic Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29182146
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27364
work_keys_str_mv AT wintermichaelb immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT lagrecaflorencia immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT arastukapurshirin immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT caiazzafrancesco immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT cimermancicpeter immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT buchholztoniaj immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT anderljanetl immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT ravalinmatthew immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT bohnmarkusf immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT saliandrej immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT odonoghueanthonyj immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation
AT craikcharless immunoproteasomefunctionsexplainedbydivergenceincleavagespecificityandregulation