Cargando…

Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic spacers in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection deliver antibiotics locally and provide temporary stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences between stemmed and stemless spacers. METHODS: All spacers placed from 2011 to 2013 were identified. Stemless s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padegimas, Eric M, Narzikul, Alexia, Lawrence, Cassandra, Hendy, Benjamin A, Abboud, Joseph A, Ramsey, Matthew L, Williams, Gerald R, Namdari, Surena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201302
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.489
_version_ 1783282024137621504
author Padegimas, Eric M
Narzikul, Alexia
Lawrence, Cassandra
Hendy, Benjamin A
Abboud, Joseph A
Ramsey, Matthew L
Williams, Gerald R
Namdari, Surena
author_facet Padegimas, Eric M
Narzikul, Alexia
Lawrence, Cassandra
Hendy, Benjamin A
Abboud, Joseph A
Ramsey, Matthew L
Williams, Gerald R
Namdari, Surena
author_sort Padegimas, Eric M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotic spacers in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection deliver antibiotics locally and provide temporary stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences between stemmed and stemless spacers. METHODS: All spacers placed from 2011 to 2013 were identified. Stemless spacers were made by creating a spherical ball of cement placed in the joint space. Stemmed spacers had some portion in the humeral canal. Operative time, complications, reimplantation, reinfection, and range of motion were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 37 spacers placed: 22 were stemless and 15 were stemmed. The stemless spacer population was older (70.9 ± 7.8 years vs. 62.8 ± 8.4 years, p = 0.006). The groups had a similar percentage of each gender (stemless group, 45% male vs. stemmed group, 40% male; p = 0.742), body mass index (stemless group, 29.1 ± 6.4 kg/m(2) vs. stemmed group, 31.5 ± 8.3 kg/m(2); p = 0.354) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (stemless group, 4.2 ± 1.2 vs. stemmed group, 4.2 ± 1.7; p = 0.958). Operative time was similar (stemless group, 127.5 ± 37.1 minutes vs. stemmed group, 130.5 ± 39.4 minutes). Two stemless group patients had self-resolving radial nerve palsies. Within the stemless group, 15 of 22 (68.2%) underwent reimplantation with 14 of 15 having forward elevation of 109° ± 23°. Within the stemmed group, 12 of 15 (80.0%, p = 0.427) underwent reimplantation with 8 of 12 having forward elevation of 94° ± 43° (range, 30° to 150°; p = 0.300). Two stemmed group patients had axillary nerve palsies, one of which self-resolved but the other did not. One patient sustained dislocation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty after reimplantation. One stemless group patient required an open reduction and glenosphere exchange of dislocated reverse shoulder arthroplasty at 6 weeks after reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Stemmed and stemless spacers had similar clinical outcomes. When analyzing all antibiotic spacers, over 70% were converted to revision arthroplasties. The results of this study do not suggest superiority of either stemmed or stemless antibiotic spacers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5705308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57053082017-12-04 Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants Padegimas, Eric M Narzikul, Alexia Lawrence, Cassandra Hendy, Benjamin A Abboud, Joseph A Ramsey, Matthew L Williams, Gerald R Namdari, Surena Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Antibiotic spacers in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection deliver antibiotics locally and provide temporary stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences between stemmed and stemless spacers. METHODS: All spacers placed from 2011 to 2013 were identified. Stemless spacers were made by creating a spherical ball of cement placed in the joint space. Stemmed spacers had some portion in the humeral canal. Operative time, complications, reimplantation, reinfection, and range of motion were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 37 spacers placed: 22 were stemless and 15 were stemmed. The stemless spacer population was older (70.9 ± 7.8 years vs. 62.8 ± 8.4 years, p = 0.006). The groups had a similar percentage of each gender (stemless group, 45% male vs. stemmed group, 40% male; p = 0.742), body mass index (stemless group, 29.1 ± 6.4 kg/m(2) vs. stemmed group, 31.5 ± 8.3 kg/m(2); p = 0.354) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (stemless group, 4.2 ± 1.2 vs. stemmed group, 4.2 ± 1.7; p = 0.958). Operative time was similar (stemless group, 127.5 ± 37.1 minutes vs. stemmed group, 130.5 ± 39.4 minutes). Two stemless group patients had self-resolving radial nerve palsies. Within the stemless group, 15 of 22 (68.2%) underwent reimplantation with 14 of 15 having forward elevation of 109° ± 23°. Within the stemmed group, 12 of 15 (80.0%, p = 0.427) underwent reimplantation with 8 of 12 having forward elevation of 94° ± 43° (range, 30° to 150°; p = 0.300). Two stemmed group patients had axillary nerve palsies, one of which self-resolved but the other did not. One patient sustained dislocation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty after reimplantation. One stemless group patient required an open reduction and glenosphere exchange of dislocated reverse shoulder arthroplasty at 6 weeks after reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Stemmed and stemless spacers had similar clinical outcomes. When analyzing all antibiotic spacers, over 70% were converted to revision arthroplasties. The results of this study do not suggest superiority of either stemmed or stemless antibiotic spacers. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2017-12 2017-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5705308/ /pubmed/29201302 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.489 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Padegimas, Eric M
Narzikul, Alexia
Lawrence, Cassandra
Hendy, Benjamin A
Abboud, Joseph A
Ramsey, Matthew L
Williams, Gerald R
Namdari, Surena
Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants
title Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants
title_full Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants
title_fullStr Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants
title_short Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants
title_sort antibiotic spacers in shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of stemmed and stemless implants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201302
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.489
work_keys_str_mv AT padegimasericm antibioticspacersinshoulderarthroplastycomparisonofstemmedandstemlessimplants
AT narzikulalexia antibioticspacersinshoulderarthroplastycomparisonofstemmedandstemlessimplants
AT lawrencecassandra antibioticspacersinshoulderarthroplastycomparisonofstemmedandstemlessimplants
AT hendybenjamina antibioticspacersinshoulderarthroplastycomparisonofstemmedandstemlessimplants
AT abboudjosepha antibioticspacersinshoulderarthroplastycomparisonofstemmedandstemlessimplants
AT ramseymatthewl antibioticspacersinshoulderarthroplastycomparisonofstemmedandstemlessimplants
AT williamsgeraldr antibioticspacersinshoulderarthroplastycomparisonofstemmedandstemlessimplants
AT namdarisurena antibioticspacersinshoulderarthroplastycomparisonofstemmedandstemlessimplants