Cargando…

Comparison of two-year outcomes after photodynamic therapy with ranibizumab or aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents is currently the first-line treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), along with anti-VEGF monotherapy. In this study, 100 eyes with treatment-naïve PCV were initially treated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kikushima, Wataru, Sakurada, Yoichi, Sugiyama, Atsushi, Yoneyama, Seigo, Tanabe, Naohiko, Matsubara, Mio, Mabuchi, Fumihiko, Iijima, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16476-1
Descripción
Sumario:Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents is currently the first-line treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), along with anti-VEGF monotherapy. In this study, 100 eyes with treatment-naïve PCV were initially treated with PDT combined with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR; n = 57) or aflibercept (IVA; n = 43). We compared two-year outcomes between these two groups and investigated factors associated with visual improvement and retreatment over 24 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.001) at 24 months. Multiple regression analysis revealed that visual improvement at 24 months was associated with female (P = 0.030), worse baseline BCVA (P = 3.0 × 10(−6)), smaller greatest linear dimension (GLD; P = 2.0 × 10(−4)), and treatment with IVA rather than IVR (P = 0.016). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that absence of retreatment was associated with younger age (P = 2.2 × 10(−4)), female (P = 1.2 × 10(−3)), and the non-risk variants of ARMS2 A69S (P = 6.0 × 10(−4)). Although there were no significant differences in the retreatment rate between the two groups, PDT/IVA may be superior to PDT/IVR in terms of visual improvement at 24 months.