Cargando…

Development of a core set of outcome measures for OAB treatment

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Standardized measures enable the comparison of outcomes across providers and treatments giving valuable information for improving care quality and efficacy. The aim of this project was to define a minimum standard set of outcome measures and case-mix factors for evaluati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foust-Wright, Caroline, Wissig, Stephanie, Stowell, Caleb, Olson, Elizabeth, Anderson, Anita, Anger, Jennifer, Cardozo, Linda, Cotterill, Nikki, Gormley, Elizabeth Ann, Toozs-Hobson, Philip, Heesakkers, John, Herbison, Peter, Moore, Kate, McKinney, Jessica, Morse, Abraham, Pulliam, Samantha, Szonyi, George, Wagg, Adrian, Milsom, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28948362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3481-6
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Standardized measures enable the comparison of outcomes across providers and treatments giving valuable information for improving care quality and efficacy. The aim of this project was to define a minimum standard set of outcome measures and case-mix factors for evaluating the care of patients with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international working group (WG) of leading clinicians and patients to engage in a structured method for developing a core outcome set. Consensus was determined by a modified Delphi process, and discussions were supported by both literature review and patient input. RESULTS: The standard set measures outcomes of care for adults seeking treatment for OAB, excluding residents of long-term care facilities. The WG focused on treatment outcomes identified as most important key outcome domains to patients: symptom burden and bother, physical functioning, emotional health, impact of symptoms and treatment on quality of life, and success of treatment. Demographic information and case-mix factors that may affect these outcomes were also included. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized outcome set for evaluating clinical care is appropriate for use by all health providers caring for patients with OAB, regardless of specialty or geographic location, and provides key data for quality improvement activities and research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-017-3481-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.