Cargando…
Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is inferior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical tumor delineation, but similar in identification of organs at risk (OAR). The trend to over-estimate high-risk and low-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV, IRCTV) on CT can lead to under-estimation of dose r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204165 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.71050 |
_version_ | 1783282104551866368 |
---|---|
author | Yip, Winnie Wing Ling Wong, Joyce Siu Yu Lee, Venus Wan Yan Wong, Frank Chi Sing Tung, Stewart Yuk |
author_facet | Yip, Winnie Wing Ling Wong, Joyce Siu Yu Lee, Venus Wan Yan Wong, Frank Chi Sing Tung, Stewart Yuk |
author_sort | Yip, Winnie Wing Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is inferior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical tumor delineation, but similar in identification of organs at risk (OAR). The trend to over-estimate high-risk and low-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV, IRCTV) on CT can lead to under-estimation of dose received by 90% (D(90)) of the ‘actual’ CTV. This study aims to evaluate whether CT-guided planning delivers adequate dose to the ‘actual’ targets while spares the OAR similarly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRI-guided high-dose-rate image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) was performed in 11 patients. The pre-brachytherapy CTs were retrospectively contoured to generate CT-guided plans. MRI-based contours (HRCTV(mri), IRCTV(mri), bladder(mri), rectum(mri), and sigmoid(mri)) were fused to CT plans for dosimetric comparison with MRI-guided plans. Paired 2-tailed t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze data. RESULTS: 63.6% of CT plans achieved the HRCTV(mri)D(90) constraint (≥ 7.2 Gy in one fraction), compared with 90.9% for MRI plans. > 90% of both modalities achieved the OAR’s constraints (EMBRACE). The percentage of CT and MRI plans that achieved the aims (EMBRACE II) for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 36.4% vs. 81.8%, 63.6% vs. 63.6%, and 72.7% vs. 72.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in HRCTV(mri)D(90), IRCTV(mri)D(90), or dose received by the most exposed 2 cm(3) (D(2cc)) of OAR(mri) between the modalities. Excluding the CT plans not achieving HRCTV(mri)D(90) constraint, there were significant increase in bladder(mri)D(2cc), rectum(mri)D(2cc), and sigmoid(mri)D(2cc), compared with MRI plans (0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-1.5, p = 0.018; 0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.3-1.4, p = 0.009; 0.5 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, p = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based IGBT remains the gold standard. CT planning may compromise HRCTV(mri)D(90) or increase OAR(mri)D(2cc), which could decrease local control or increase treatment toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5705838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57058382017-12-04 Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk Yip, Winnie Wing Ling Wong, Joyce Siu Yu Lee, Venus Wan Yan Wong, Frank Chi Sing Tung, Stewart Yuk J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is inferior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical tumor delineation, but similar in identification of organs at risk (OAR). The trend to over-estimate high-risk and low-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV, IRCTV) on CT can lead to under-estimation of dose received by 90% (D(90)) of the ‘actual’ CTV. This study aims to evaluate whether CT-guided planning delivers adequate dose to the ‘actual’ targets while spares the OAR similarly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRI-guided high-dose-rate image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) was performed in 11 patients. The pre-brachytherapy CTs were retrospectively contoured to generate CT-guided plans. MRI-based contours (HRCTV(mri), IRCTV(mri), bladder(mri), rectum(mri), and sigmoid(mri)) were fused to CT plans for dosimetric comparison with MRI-guided plans. Paired 2-tailed t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze data. RESULTS: 63.6% of CT plans achieved the HRCTV(mri)D(90) constraint (≥ 7.2 Gy in one fraction), compared with 90.9% for MRI plans. > 90% of both modalities achieved the OAR’s constraints (EMBRACE). The percentage of CT and MRI plans that achieved the aims (EMBRACE II) for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 36.4% vs. 81.8%, 63.6% vs. 63.6%, and 72.7% vs. 72.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in HRCTV(mri)D(90), IRCTV(mri)D(90), or dose received by the most exposed 2 cm(3) (D(2cc)) of OAR(mri) between the modalities. Excluding the CT plans not achieving HRCTV(mri)D(90) constraint, there were significant increase in bladder(mri)D(2cc), rectum(mri)D(2cc), and sigmoid(mri)D(2cc), compared with MRI plans (0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-1.5, p = 0.018; 0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.3-1.4, p = 0.009; 0.5 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, p = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based IGBT remains the gold standard. CT planning may compromise HRCTV(mri)D(90) or increase OAR(mri)D(2cc), which could decrease local control or increase treatment toxicity. Termedia Publishing House 2017-10-30 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5705838/ /pubmed/29204165 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.71050 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Yip, Winnie Wing Ling Wong, Joyce Siu Yu Lee, Venus Wan Yan Wong, Frank Chi Sing Tung, Stewart Yuk Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk |
title | Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk |
title_full | Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk |
title_fullStr | Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk |
title_short | Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk |
title_sort | throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204165 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.71050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yipwinniewingling throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk AT wongjoycesiuyu throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk AT leevenuswanyan throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk AT wongfrankchising throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk AT tungstewartyuk throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk |