Cargando…

Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk

PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is inferior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical tumor delineation, but similar in identification of organs at risk (OAR). The trend to over-estimate high-risk and low-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV, IRCTV) on CT can lead to under-estimation of dose r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yip, Winnie Wing Ling, Wong, Joyce Siu Yu, Lee, Venus Wan Yan, Wong, Frank Chi Sing, Tung, Stewart Yuk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204165
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.71050
_version_ 1783282104551866368
author Yip, Winnie Wing Ling
Wong, Joyce Siu Yu
Lee, Venus Wan Yan
Wong, Frank Chi Sing
Tung, Stewart Yuk
author_facet Yip, Winnie Wing Ling
Wong, Joyce Siu Yu
Lee, Venus Wan Yan
Wong, Frank Chi Sing
Tung, Stewart Yuk
author_sort Yip, Winnie Wing Ling
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is inferior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical tumor delineation, but similar in identification of organs at risk (OAR). The trend to over-estimate high-risk and low-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV, IRCTV) on CT can lead to under-estimation of dose received by 90% (D(90)) of the ‘actual’ CTV. This study aims to evaluate whether CT-guided planning delivers adequate dose to the ‘actual’ targets while spares the OAR similarly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRI-guided high-dose-rate image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) was performed in 11 patients. The pre-brachytherapy CTs were retrospectively contoured to generate CT-guided plans. MRI-based contours (HRCTV(mri), IRCTV(mri), bladder(mri), rectum(mri), and sigmoid(mri)) were fused to CT plans for dosimetric comparison with MRI-guided plans. Paired 2-tailed t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze data. RESULTS: 63.6% of CT plans achieved the HRCTV(mri)D(90) constraint (≥ 7.2 Gy in one fraction), compared with 90.9% for MRI plans. > 90% of both modalities achieved the OAR’s constraints (EMBRACE). The percentage of CT and MRI plans that achieved the aims (EMBRACE II) for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 36.4% vs. 81.8%, 63.6% vs. 63.6%, and 72.7% vs. 72.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in HRCTV(mri)D(90), IRCTV(mri)D(90), or dose received by the most exposed 2 cm(3) (D(2cc)) of OAR(mri) between the modalities. Excluding the CT plans not achieving HRCTV(mri)D(90) constraint, there were significant increase in bladder(mri)D(2cc), rectum(mri)D(2cc), and sigmoid(mri)D(2cc), compared with MRI plans (0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-1.5, p = 0.018; 0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.3-1.4, p = 0.009; 0.5 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, p = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based IGBT remains the gold standard. CT planning may compromise HRCTV(mri)D(90) or increase OAR(mri)D(2cc), which could decrease local control or increase treatment toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5705838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57058382017-12-04 Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk Yip, Winnie Wing Ling Wong, Joyce Siu Yu Lee, Venus Wan Yan Wong, Frank Chi Sing Tung, Stewart Yuk J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is inferior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical tumor delineation, but similar in identification of organs at risk (OAR). The trend to over-estimate high-risk and low-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV, IRCTV) on CT can lead to under-estimation of dose received by 90% (D(90)) of the ‘actual’ CTV. This study aims to evaluate whether CT-guided planning delivers adequate dose to the ‘actual’ targets while spares the OAR similarly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRI-guided high-dose-rate image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) was performed in 11 patients. The pre-brachytherapy CTs were retrospectively contoured to generate CT-guided plans. MRI-based contours (HRCTV(mri), IRCTV(mri), bladder(mri), rectum(mri), and sigmoid(mri)) were fused to CT plans for dosimetric comparison with MRI-guided plans. Paired 2-tailed t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze data. RESULTS: 63.6% of CT plans achieved the HRCTV(mri)D(90) constraint (≥ 7.2 Gy in one fraction), compared with 90.9% for MRI plans. > 90% of both modalities achieved the OAR’s constraints (EMBRACE). The percentage of CT and MRI plans that achieved the aims (EMBRACE II) for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 36.4% vs. 81.8%, 63.6% vs. 63.6%, and 72.7% vs. 72.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in HRCTV(mri)D(90), IRCTV(mri)D(90), or dose received by the most exposed 2 cm(3) (D(2cc)) of OAR(mri) between the modalities. Excluding the CT plans not achieving HRCTV(mri)D(90) constraint, there were significant increase in bladder(mri)D(2cc), rectum(mri)D(2cc), and sigmoid(mri)D(2cc), compared with MRI plans (0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-1.5, p = 0.018; 0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.3-1.4, p = 0.009; 0.5 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, p = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based IGBT remains the gold standard. CT planning may compromise HRCTV(mri)D(90) or increase OAR(mri)D(2cc), which could decrease local control or increase treatment toxicity. Termedia Publishing House 2017-10-30 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5705838/ /pubmed/29204165 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.71050 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Yip, Winnie Wing Ling
Wong, Joyce Siu Yu
Lee, Venus Wan Yan
Wong, Frank Chi Sing
Tung, Stewart Yuk
Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
title Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
title_full Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
title_fullStr Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
title_full_unstemmed Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
title_short Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
title_sort throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204165
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.71050
work_keys_str_mv AT yipwinniewingling throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk
AT wongjoycesiuyu throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk
AT leevenuswanyan throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk
AT wongfrankchising throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk
AT tungstewartyuk throwingthedartblindfoldedcomparisonofcomputedtomographyversusmagneticresonanceimagingguidedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancerwithregardtodosereceivedbytheactualtargetsandorgansatrisk