Cargando…
Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy
BACKGROUND: An in vitro model for peri-implantitis treatment was used to identify areas that are clinically difficult to clean by analyzing the pattern of residual stain after debridement with commonly employed instruments. METHODS: Original data from two previous publications, which simulated surgi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0428-8 |
_version_ | 1783282164659388416 |
---|---|
author | Steiger-Ronay, Valerie Merlini, Andrea Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Schmidlin, Patrick R. Attin, Thomas Sahrmann, Philipp |
author_facet | Steiger-Ronay, Valerie Merlini, Andrea Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Schmidlin, Patrick R. Attin, Thomas Sahrmann, Philipp |
author_sort | Steiger-Ronay, Valerie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An in vitro model for peri-implantitis treatment was used to identify areas that are clinically difficult to clean by analyzing the pattern of residual stain after debridement with commonly employed instruments. METHODS: Original data from two previous publications, which simulated surgical (SA) and non-surgical (NSA) implant debridement on two different implant systems respectively, were reanalyzed regarding the localization pattern of residual stains after instrumentation. Two blinded examiners evaluated standardized photographs of 360 initially ink-stained dental implants, which were cleaned at variable defect angulations (30, 60, or 90°), using different instrument types (Gracey curette, ultrasonic scaler or air powder abrasive device) and treatment approaches (SA or NSA). Predefined implant surface areas were graded for residual stain using scores ranging from one (stain-covered) to six (clean). Score differences between respective implant areas were tested for significance by pairwise comparisons using Wilcoxon-rank-sum-tests with a significance level α = 5%. RESULTS: Best scores were found at the machined surface areas (SA: 5.58 ± 0.43, NSA: 4.76 ± 1.09), followed by the tips of the threads (SA: 4.29 ± 0.44, NSA: 4.43 ± 0.61), and areas between threads (SA: 3.79 ± 0.89, NSA: 2.42 ± 1.11). Apically facing threads were most difficult to clean (SA: 1.70 ± 0.92, NSA: 2.42 ± 1.11). Here, air powder abrasives provided the best results. CONCLUSION: Machined surfaces at the implant shoulder were well accessible and showed least amounts of residual stain. Apically facing thread surfaces constituted the area with most residual stain regardless of treatment approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5706147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57061472017-12-05 Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy Steiger-Ronay, Valerie Merlini, Andrea Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Schmidlin, Patrick R. Attin, Thomas Sahrmann, Philipp BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: An in vitro model for peri-implantitis treatment was used to identify areas that are clinically difficult to clean by analyzing the pattern of residual stain after debridement with commonly employed instruments. METHODS: Original data from two previous publications, which simulated surgical (SA) and non-surgical (NSA) implant debridement on two different implant systems respectively, were reanalyzed regarding the localization pattern of residual stains after instrumentation. Two blinded examiners evaluated standardized photographs of 360 initially ink-stained dental implants, which were cleaned at variable defect angulations (30, 60, or 90°), using different instrument types (Gracey curette, ultrasonic scaler or air powder abrasive device) and treatment approaches (SA or NSA). Predefined implant surface areas were graded for residual stain using scores ranging from one (stain-covered) to six (clean). Score differences between respective implant areas were tested for significance by pairwise comparisons using Wilcoxon-rank-sum-tests with a significance level α = 5%. RESULTS: Best scores were found at the machined surface areas (SA: 5.58 ± 0.43, NSA: 4.76 ± 1.09), followed by the tips of the threads (SA: 4.29 ± 0.44, NSA: 4.43 ± 0.61), and areas between threads (SA: 3.79 ± 0.89, NSA: 2.42 ± 1.11). Apically facing threads were most difficult to clean (SA: 1.70 ± 0.92, NSA: 2.42 ± 1.11). Here, air powder abrasives provided the best results. CONCLUSION: Machined surfaces at the implant shoulder were well accessible and showed least amounts of residual stain. Apically facing thread surfaces constituted the area with most residual stain regardless of treatment approach. BioMed Central 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5706147/ /pubmed/29183313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0428-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Steiger-Ronay, Valerie Merlini, Andrea Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Schmidlin, Patrick R. Attin, Thomas Sahrmann, Philipp Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy |
title | Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy |
title_full | Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy |
title_fullStr | Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy |
title_short | Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy |
title_sort | location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0428-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steigerronayvalerie locationofunaccessibleimplantsurfaceareasduringdebridementinsimulatedperiimplantitistherapy AT merliniandrea locationofunaccessibleimplantsurfaceareasduringdebridementinsimulatedperiimplantitistherapy AT wiedemeierdanielb locationofunaccessibleimplantsurfaceareasduringdebridementinsimulatedperiimplantitistherapy AT schmidlinpatrickr locationofunaccessibleimplantsurfaceareasduringdebridementinsimulatedperiimplantitistherapy AT attinthomas locationofunaccessibleimplantsurfaceareasduringdebridementinsimulatedperiimplantitistherapy AT sahrmannphilipp locationofunaccessibleimplantsurfaceareasduringdebridementinsimulatedperiimplantitistherapy |