Cargando…

Calotropis gigantea extract as a potential anticariogenic agents against Streptococcus mutans: An in vivo comparative evaluation

OBJECTIVE: The current study was intended to evaluate and compare the in vivo efficacy of Calotropis gigantea mouth rinse as anticariogenic agents with 0.2% chlorhexidine and Listerine mouth rinse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental crossover study was conducted on sixty school children aged 14–...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Meenakshi, Tandon, Sandeep, Nayak, Ullal Anand, Kappadi, Damodhar, Rathore, Ambika Singh, Goyal, Anil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29279621
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_13_16
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The current study was intended to evaluate and compare the in vivo efficacy of Calotropis gigantea mouth rinse as anticariogenic agents with 0.2% chlorhexidine and Listerine mouth rinse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental crossover study was conducted on sixty school children aged 14–15 years. Participants were divided into three Groups A, B, and C. In all children, baseline unstimulated saliva samples were collected and assessed for Streptococcus mutans counts. The study was conducted in three phases; each phase lasted for 8 days separated by a washout period of 15 days in between them. Groups A, B, and C were treated with 0.2% chlorhexidine, Listerine and C. gigantea extract mouth rinses, respectively, in the Phase I and assessed for salivary S. mutans counts. Subsequently, mouth rinses were crossed over as dictated by the Latin square design in Phase II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: All the three mouth rinses have individually shown a statistically significant reduction in the salivary S. mutans counts.