Cargando…
Evaluation of effect of different disposable infection control barriers on light intensity of light-curing unit and microhardness of composite - An in vitro study
AIMS: This study evaluated effect of infection control barriers on light intensity (LI) of light-curing unit (LCU) and microhardness of composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different disposable barriers (n = 30) were tested against the control. LI for each barrier was measured with Lux meter. One...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29279622 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_171_16 |
Sumario: | AIMS: This study evaluated effect of infection control barriers on light intensity (LI) of light-curing unit (LCU) and microhardness of composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different disposable barriers (n = 30) were tested against the control. LI for each barrier was measured with Lux meter. One hundred and fifty Teflon molds were equally divided into five groups of thirty each. Composite was filled in bulk in these molds and cured without and with barrier. Microhardness was evaluated on top and bottom surface of composite specimen with microhardness testing machine and hardness ratio (HR) was derived. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way analysis of variance, Tukey's honestly significant difference test, and paired t-test using SPSS version 18 software. RESULTS: All barriers had significantly reduced the baseline LI of LCU (P < 0.0001), but only Cure Elastic Steri-Shield and latex cut glove pieces (LCGP) significantly reduced the microhardness of the composite (P < 0.05). However, HR determined inadequate curing only with LCGP. CONCLUSIONS: Although entire tested barrier significantly reduced the LI; none, except LCGP markedly affected the degree of cure of the composite. |
---|