Cargando…

Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion

BACKGROUND: Intrafractional motion can be a substantial uncertainty in precision radiotherapy. Conventionally, the target volume is expanded to account for the motion. Couch-tracking is an alternative, where the patient is moved to compensate for the tumor motion. However, the couch motion may influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jöhl, Alexander, Bogowicz, Marta, Ehrbar, Stefanie, Guckenberger, Matthias, Klöck, Stephan, Meboldt, Mirko, Riesterer, Oliver, Zeilinger, Melanie, Schmid Daners, Marianne, Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0925-6
_version_ 1783282222442217472
author Jöhl, Alexander
Bogowicz, Marta
Ehrbar, Stefanie
Guckenberger, Matthias
Klöck, Stephan
Meboldt, Mirko
Riesterer, Oliver
Zeilinger, Melanie
Schmid Daners, Marianne
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
author_facet Jöhl, Alexander
Bogowicz, Marta
Ehrbar, Stefanie
Guckenberger, Matthias
Klöck, Stephan
Meboldt, Mirko
Riesterer, Oliver
Zeilinger, Melanie
Schmid Daners, Marianne
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
author_sort Jöhl, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intrafractional motion can be a substantial uncertainty in precision radiotherapy. Conventionally, the target volume is expanded to account for the motion. Couch-tracking is an alternative, where the patient is moved to compensate for the tumor motion. However, the couch motion may influence the patient’s stress and respiration behavior decreasing the couch-tracking effectiveness. METHODS: In total, 100 volunteers were positioned supine on a robotic couch, which moved dynamically and respiration synchronized. During the measurement, the skin conductivity, the heartrate, and the gaze location were measured indicating the volunteer’s stress. Volunteers rated the subjective motion sickness using a questionnaire. The measurement alternated between static and tracking segments (three cycles), each 1 min long. RESULTS: The respiration amplitude showed no significant difference between tracking and static segments, but decreased significantly from the first to the last tracking segment (p < 0.0001). The respiration frequency differed significantly between tracking and static segments (p < 0.0001), but not between the first and the last tracking segment. The physiological parameters and the questionnaire showed mild signals of stress and motion sickness. CONCLUSION: Generally, people tolerated the couch motions. The interaction between couch motion and the patient’s breathing pattern should be considered for a clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02820532) and the Swiss national clinical trials portal (SNCTP000001878) on June 20, 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0925-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5706399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57063992017-12-06 Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion Jöhl, Alexander Bogowicz, Marta Ehrbar, Stefanie Guckenberger, Matthias Klöck, Stephan Meboldt, Mirko Riesterer, Oliver Zeilinger, Melanie Schmid Daners, Marianne Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Intrafractional motion can be a substantial uncertainty in precision radiotherapy. Conventionally, the target volume is expanded to account for the motion. Couch-tracking is an alternative, where the patient is moved to compensate for the tumor motion. However, the couch motion may influence the patient’s stress and respiration behavior decreasing the couch-tracking effectiveness. METHODS: In total, 100 volunteers were positioned supine on a robotic couch, which moved dynamically and respiration synchronized. During the measurement, the skin conductivity, the heartrate, and the gaze location were measured indicating the volunteer’s stress. Volunteers rated the subjective motion sickness using a questionnaire. The measurement alternated between static and tracking segments (three cycles), each 1 min long. RESULTS: The respiration amplitude showed no significant difference between tracking and static segments, but decreased significantly from the first to the last tracking segment (p < 0.0001). The respiration frequency differed significantly between tracking and static segments (p < 0.0001), but not between the first and the last tracking segment. The physiological parameters and the questionnaire showed mild signals of stress and motion sickness. CONCLUSION: Generally, people tolerated the couch motions. The interaction between couch motion and the patient’s breathing pattern should be considered for a clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02820532) and the Swiss national clinical trials portal (SNCTP000001878) on June 20, 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0925-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5706399/ /pubmed/29183337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0925-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jöhl, Alexander
Bogowicz, Marta
Ehrbar, Stefanie
Guckenberger, Matthias
Klöck, Stephan
Meboldt, Mirko
Riesterer, Oliver
Zeilinger, Melanie
Schmid Daners, Marianne
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion
title Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion
title_full Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion
title_fullStr Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion
title_full_unstemmed Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion
title_short Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion
title_sort unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0925-6
work_keys_str_mv AT johlalexander unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT bogowiczmarta unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT ehrbarstefanie unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT guckenbergermatthias unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT klockstephan unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT meboldtmirko unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT riestereroliver unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT zeilingermelanie unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT schmiddanersmarianne unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion
AT tanadinilangstephanie unconsciousphysiologicalresponseofhealthyvolunteerstodynamicrespirationsynchronizedcouchmotion