Cargando…
Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
BACKGROUND: In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies – a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) – were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4 |
_version_ | 1783282227938852864 |
---|---|
author | Han van Krieken, J. Kafatos, George Bennett, James Mineur, Laurent Tomášek, Jiří Rouleau, Etienne Fabian, Pavel De Maglio, Giovanna García-Alfonso, Pilar Aprile, Giuseppe Parkar, Parijan Downey, Gerald Demonty, Gaston Trojan, Jörg |
author_facet | Han van Krieken, J. Kafatos, George Bennett, James Mineur, Laurent Tomášek, Jiří Rouleau, Etienne Fabian, Pavel De Maglio, Giovanna García-Alfonso, Pilar Aprile, Giuseppe Parkar, Parijan Downey, Gerald Demonty, Gaston Trojan, Jörg |
author_sort | Han van Krieken, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies – a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) – were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribing oncologists of the associated RAS testing requirements in clinical practice. METHODS: Both studies enrolled participants from nine European countries and were carried out in three consecutive rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 (2012–2013) examined KRAS (exon 2) testing only; the results have been published in full previously. Round 3 (2014–2015) examined full RAS testing (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) and was initiated following a change in prescribing guidelines, from requiring KRAS alone to requiring full RAS testing. For the physician survey, telephone interviews were conducted with oncologists who had prescribed panitumumab to patients with mCRC in the previous 6 months. For the MRR, oncologists were asked to provide anonymised clinical information, extracted from their patients’ records. RESULTS: In Round 3, 152 oncologists and 131 patients’ records were included in the physician survey and MRR, respectively. In Round 3 of the physician survey, 95.4% (n = 145) of participants correctly identified that panitumumab should only be prescribed in RAS wild-type mCRC compared with 99.0% (n = 298) of 301 participants in Rounds 1 and 2, responding to the same question about KRAS testing. In Round 3 of the MRR, 100% (n = 131) of patients included in the study had confirmed KRAS or RAS wild-type status prior to initiation of panitumumab compared with 97.7% (n = 299) of 306 patients in Rounds 1 and 2 (KRAS only). Of those patients in Round 3, 83.2% (n = 109) had been tested for RAS status and 16.8% (n = 22) had been tested for KRAS status only. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians’ adherence to prescribing guidelines has remained high over time in Europe, despite the change in indication for panitumumab treatment, from KRAS to RAS wild-type mCRC. Additionally, this study demonstrates the uptake of full RAS testing among the majority of oncologists and pathologists. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5706421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57064212017-12-06 Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review Han van Krieken, J. Kafatos, George Bennett, James Mineur, Laurent Tomášek, Jiří Rouleau, Etienne Fabian, Pavel De Maglio, Giovanna García-Alfonso, Pilar Aprile, Giuseppe Parkar, Parijan Downey, Gerald Demonty, Gaston Trojan, Jörg BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies – a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) – were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribing oncologists of the associated RAS testing requirements in clinical practice. METHODS: Both studies enrolled participants from nine European countries and were carried out in three consecutive rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 (2012–2013) examined KRAS (exon 2) testing only; the results have been published in full previously. Round 3 (2014–2015) examined full RAS testing (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) and was initiated following a change in prescribing guidelines, from requiring KRAS alone to requiring full RAS testing. For the physician survey, telephone interviews were conducted with oncologists who had prescribed panitumumab to patients with mCRC in the previous 6 months. For the MRR, oncologists were asked to provide anonymised clinical information, extracted from their patients’ records. RESULTS: In Round 3, 152 oncologists and 131 patients’ records were included in the physician survey and MRR, respectively. In Round 3 of the physician survey, 95.4% (n = 145) of participants correctly identified that panitumumab should only be prescribed in RAS wild-type mCRC compared with 99.0% (n = 298) of 301 participants in Rounds 1 and 2, responding to the same question about KRAS testing. In Round 3 of the MRR, 100% (n = 131) of patients included in the study had confirmed KRAS or RAS wild-type status prior to initiation of panitumumab compared with 97.7% (n = 299) of 306 patients in Rounds 1 and 2 (KRAS only). Of those patients in Round 3, 83.2% (n = 109) had been tested for RAS status and 16.8% (n = 22) had been tested for KRAS status only. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians’ adherence to prescribing guidelines has remained high over time in Europe, despite the change in indication for panitumumab treatment, from KRAS to RAS wild-type mCRC. Additionally, this study demonstrates the uptake of full RAS testing among the majority of oncologists and pathologists. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5706421/ /pubmed/29183279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Han van Krieken, J. Kafatos, George Bennett, James Mineur, Laurent Tomášek, Jiří Rouleau, Etienne Fabian, Pavel De Maglio, Giovanna García-Alfonso, Pilar Aprile, Giuseppe Parkar, Parijan Downey, Gerald Demonty, Gaston Trojan, Jörg Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review |
title | Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review |
title_full | Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review |
title_fullStr | Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review |
title_full_unstemmed | Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review |
title_short | Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review |
title_sort | panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of ras testing: results from a europe-wide physician survey and medical records review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanvankriekenj panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT kafatosgeorge panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT bennettjames panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT mineurlaurent panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT tomasekjiri panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT rouleauetienne panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT fabianpavel panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT demagliogiovanna panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT garciaalfonsopilar panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT aprilegiuseppe panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT parkarparijan panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT downeygerald panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT demontygaston panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview AT trojanjorg panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview |