Cargando…

Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review

BACKGROUND: In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies – a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) – were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han van Krieken, J., Kafatos, George, Bennett, James, Mineur, Laurent, Tomášek, Jiří, Rouleau, Etienne, Fabian, Pavel, De Maglio, Giovanna, García-Alfonso, Pilar, Aprile, Giuseppe, Parkar, Parijan, Downey, Gerald, Demonty, Gaston, Trojan, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4
_version_ 1783282227938852864
author Han van Krieken, J.
Kafatos, George
Bennett, James
Mineur, Laurent
Tomášek, Jiří
Rouleau, Etienne
Fabian, Pavel
De Maglio, Giovanna
García-Alfonso, Pilar
Aprile, Giuseppe
Parkar, Parijan
Downey, Gerald
Demonty, Gaston
Trojan, Jörg
author_facet Han van Krieken, J.
Kafatos, George
Bennett, James
Mineur, Laurent
Tomášek, Jiří
Rouleau, Etienne
Fabian, Pavel
De Maglio, Giovanna
García-Alfonso, Pilar
Aprile, Giuseppe
Parkar, Parijan
Downey, Gerald
Demonty, Gaston
Trojan, Jörg
author_sort Han van Krieken, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies – a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) – were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribing oncologists of the associated RAS testing requirements in clinical practice. METHODS: Both studies enrolled participants from nine European countries and were carried out in three consecutive rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 (2012–2013) examined KRAS (exon 2) testing only; the results have been published in full previously. Round 3 (2014–2015) examined full RAS testing (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) and was initiated following a change in prescribing guidelines, from requiring KRAS alone to requiring full RAS testing. For the physician survey, telephone interviews were conducted with oncologists who had prescribed panitumumab to patients with mCRC in the previous 6 months. For the MRR, oncologists were asked to provide anonymised clinical information, extracted from their patients’ records. RESULTS: In Round 3, 152 oncologists and 131 patients’ records were included in the physician survey and MRR, respectively. In Round 3 of the physician survey, 95.4% (n = 145) of participants correctly identified that panitumumab should only be prescribed in RAS wild-type mCRC compared with 99.0% (n = 298) of 301 participants in Rounds 1 and 2, responding to the same question about KRAS testing. In Round 3 of the MRR, 100% (n = 131) of patients included in the study had confirmed KRAS or RAS wild-type status prior to initiation of panitumumab compared with 97.7% (n = 299) of 306 patients in Rounds 1 and 2 (KRAS only). Of those patients in Round 3, 83.2% (n = 109) had been tested for RAS status and 16.8% (n = 22) had been tested for KRAS status only. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians’ adherence to prescribing guidelines has remained high over time in Europe, despite the change in indication for panitumumab treatment, from KRAS to RAS wild-type mCRC. Additionally, this study demonstrates the uptake of full RAS testing among the majority of oncologists and pathologists. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5706421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57064212017-12-06 Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review Han van Krieken, J. Kafatos, George Bennett, James Mineur, Laurent Tomášek, Jiří Rouleau, Etienne Fabian, Pavel De Maglio, Giovanna García-Alfonso, Pilar Aprile, Giuseppe Parkar, Parijan Downey, Gerald Demonty, Gaston Trojan, Jörg BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies – a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) – were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribing oncologists of the associated RAS testing requirements in clinical practice. METHODS: Both studies enrolled participants from nine European countries and were carried out in three consecutive rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 (2012–2013) examined KRAS (exon 2) testing only; the results have been published in full previously. Round 3 (2014–2015) examined full RAS testing (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) and was initiated following a change in prescribing guidelines, from requiring KRAS alone to requiring full RAS testing. For the physician survey, telephone interviews were conducted with oncologists who had prescribed panitumumab to patients with mCRC in the previous 6 months. For the MRR, oncologists were asked to provide anonymised clinical information, extracted from their patients’ records. RESULTS: In Round 3, 152 oncologists and 131 patients’ records were included in the physician survey and MRR, respectively. In Round 3 of the physician survey, 95.4% (n = 145) of participants correctly identified that panitumumab should only be prescribed in RAS wild-type mCRC compared with 99.0% (n = 298) of 301 participants in Rounds 1 and 2, responding to the same question about KRAS testing. In Round 3 of the MRR, 100% (n = 131) of patients included in the study had confirmed KRAS or RAS wild-type status prior to initiation of panitumumab compared with 97.7% (n = 299) of 306 patients in Rounds 1 and 2 (KRAS only). Of those patients in Round 3, 83.2% (n = 109) had been tested for RAS status and 16.8% (n = 22) had been tested for KRAS status only. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians’ adherence to prescribing guidelines has remained high over time in Europe, despite the change in indication for panitumumab treatment, from KRAS to RAS wild-type mCRC. Additionally, this study demonstrates the uptake of full RAS testing among the majority of oncologists and pathologists. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5706421/ /pubmed/29183279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Han van Krieken, J.
Kafatos, George
Bennett, James
Mineur, Laurent
Tomášek, Jiří
Rouleau, Etienne
Fabian, Pavel
De Maglio, Giovanna
García-Alfonso, Pilar
Aprile, Giuseppe
Parkar, Parijan
Downey, Gerald
Demonty, Gaston
Trojan, Jörg
Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
title Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
title_full Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
title_fullStr Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
title_full_unstemmed Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
title_short Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
title_sort panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of ras testing: results from a europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hanvankriekenj panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT kafatosgeorge panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT bennettjames panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT mineurlaurent panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT tomasekjiri panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT rouleauetienne panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT fabianpavel panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT demagliogiovanna panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT garciaalfonsopilar panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT aprilegiuseppe panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT parkarparijan panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT downeygerald panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT demontygaston panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview
AT trojanjorg panitumumabuseinmetastaticcolorectalcancerandpatternsofrastestingresultsfromaeuropewidephysiciansurveyandmedicalrecordsreview