Cargando…

Can peer support be cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in East of England communities

BACKGROUND: Diabetes peer support, where one person with diabetes helps others, may improve diabetes management. The objective of this study was to perform a cost analysis of peer support strategies used in RAndomized controlled trial of Peer Support in type 2 Diabetes. METHODS: We performed a 2×2 f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wingate, La’Marcus, Graffy, Jonathan, Holman, Daniel, Simmons, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000328
_version_ 1783282238589239296
author Wingate, La’Marcus
Graffy, Jonathan
Holman, Daniel
Simmons, David
author_facet Wingate, La’Marcus
Graffy, Jonathan
Holman, Daniel
Simmons, David
author_sort Wingate, La’Marcus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetes peer support, where one person with diabetes helps others, may improve diabetes management. The objective of this study was to perform a cost analysis of peer support strategies used in RAndomized controlled trial of Peer Support in type 2 Diabetes. METHODS: We performed a 2×2 factorial randomized cluster controlled trial in England. People with type 2 diabetes were invited to participate as either ‘peer’ or ‘peer support facilitator’ (PSF) through postal invitation predominantly from general practice. Clusters, based on local communities, were each randomly assigned to one arm of group, 1:1, both group and 1:1 or control interventions. The intervention was delivered over 8–12 months by trained PSFs, supported by monthly meetings with a diabetes nurse. Out-of-pocket expenses/service utilization were self-reported at baseline, midpoint and on trial completion. Intervention costs were collated. Non-hospital costs used National Health Service (NHS) reference costs. Hospital payments were obtained from one local commissioning group and mean payments calculated. The analysis employed a societal perspective. Costs were evaluated at the conclusion of the trial. RESULTS: Participants (n=1299) were recruited across 130 clusters. The four arms were well balanced and matched (60% male, mean diabetes duration 9.5 years, mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.4+/-1.3%, 17% insulin treated). Implementation costs at 2013 rates were £13.84/participant/annum, participant out-of-pocket expenses for any intervention were £11.41/participant/annum and the NHS-incurred costs were reduced by £138.38/participant/annum. Savings for the 1:1, group and any intervention were £233.65, £90.52 and £113.13/participant/annum, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that both 1:1 and group diabetes peer support over 8–12 months are cost saving in this setting, although much of the benefit is largely derived by differences in self-reported healthcare utilization. Long-term benefits should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN66963621
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5706488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57064882017-12-08 Can peer support be cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in East of England communities Wingate, La’Marcus Graffy, Jonathan Holman, Daniel Simmons, David BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research BACKGROUND: Diabetes peer support, where one person with diabetes helps others, may improve diabetes management. The objective of this study was to perform a cost analysis of peer support strategies used in RAndomized controlled trial of Peer Support in type 2 Diabetes. METHODS: We performed a 2×2 factorial randomized cluster controlled trial in England. People with type 2 diabetes were invited to participate as either ‘peer’ or ‘peer support facilitator’ (PSF) through postal invitation predominantly from general practice. Clusters, based on local communities, were each randomly assigned to one arm of group, 1:1, both group and 1:1 or control interventions. The intervention was delivered over 8–12 months by trained PSFs, supported by monthly meetings with a diabetes nurse. Out-of-pocket expenses/service utilization were self-reported at baseline, midpoint and on trial completion. Intervention costs were collated. Non-hospital costs used National Health Service (NHS) reference costs. Hospital payments were obtained from one local commissioning group and mean payments calculated. The analysis employed a societal perspective. Costs were evaluated at the conclusion of the trial. RESULTS: Participants (n=1299) were recruited across 130 clusters. The four arms were well balanced and matched (60% male, mean diabetes duration 9.5 years, mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.4+/-1.3%, 17% insulin treated). Implementation costs at 2013 rates were £13.84/participant/annum, participant out-of-pocket expenses for any intervention were £11.41/participant/annum and the NHS-incurred costs were reduced by £138.38/participant/annum. Savings for the 1:1, group and any intervention were £233.65, £90.52 and £113.13/participant/annum, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that both 1:1 and group diabetes peer support over 8–12 months are cost saving in this setting, although much of the benefit is largely derived by differences in self-reported healthcare utilization. Long-term benefits should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN66963621 BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5706488/ /pubmed/29225890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000328 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health Services Research
Wingate, La’Marcus
Graffy, Jonathan
Holman, Daniel
Simmons, David
Can peer support be cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in East of England communities
title Can peer support be cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in East of England communities
title_full Can peer support be cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in East of England communities
title_fullStr Can peer support be cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in East of England communities
title_full_unstemmed Can peer support be cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in East of England communities
title_short Can peer support be cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in East of England communities
title_sort can peer support be cost saving? an economic evaluation of rapsid: a randomized controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual care alone in east of england communities
topic Epidemiology/Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000328
work_keys_str_mv AT wingatelamarcus canpeersupportbecostsavinganeconomicevaluationofrapsidarandomizedcontrolledtrialofpeersupportindiabetescomparedtousualcarealoneineastofenglandcommunities
AT graffyjonathan canpeersupportbecostsavinganeconomicevaluationofrapsidarandomizedcontrolledtrialofpeersupportindiabetescomparedtousualcarealoneineastofenglandcommunities
AT holmandaniel canpeersupportbecostsavinganeconomicevaluationofrapsidarandomizedcontrolledtrialofpeersupportindiabetescomparedtousualcarealoneineastofenglandcommunities
AT simmonsdavid canpeersupportbecostsavinganeconomicevaluationofrapsidarandomizedcontrolledtrialofpeersupportindiabetescomparedtousualcarealoneineastofenglandcommunities