Cargando…

Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography

BACKGROUND: To explore motion information included in 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT by comparing volumetric and positional differences of GTV. RESULTS: Independent of tumor location, significant differences were observed among volumes [IGTV(10) > (IGTV(CBCT) or IGTV(MIP)) > (GTV(3D) or GTV(4D50))]. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Chao-Yue, Li, Jian-Bin, Wang, Jin-Zhi, Wang, Wei, Li, Feng-Xiang, Guo, Yan-Luan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29221150
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21520
_version_ 1783282343366098944
author Hu, Chao-Yue
Li, Jian-Bin
Wang, Jin-Zhi
Wang, Wei
Li, Feng-Xiang
Guo, Yan-Luan
author_facet Hu, Chao-Yue
Li, Jian-Bin
Wang, Jin-Zhi
Wang, Wei
Li, Feng-Xiang
Guo, Yan-Luan
author_sort Hu, Chao-Yue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To explore motion information included in 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT by comparing volumetric and positional differences of GTV. RESULTS: Independent of tumor location, significant differences were observed among volumes [IGTV(10) > (IGTV(CBCT) or IGTV(MIP)) > (GTV(3D) or GTV(4D50))]. The underestimations or overestimations between IGTV(10) and IGTV(CBCT) were larger than those between IGTV(10) and IGTV(MIP) (p < 0.001–0.011; p < 0.001–0.023). For upper oesophageal tumors, GTV(4D50)/IGTV(CBCT) negatively correlated with motion vector (r = –0.756, p = 0.011). In AP direction, the centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) differed from GTV(3D), GTV(4D50), IGTV(MIP) and IGTV(10) (p = 0.006, 0.013, 0.038, and 0.010). For middle oesophageal tumors, IGTV(10)/IGTV(CBCT) positively correlated with motion vector (r = 0.695, p = 0.006). The centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) differed from those of IGTV(10) (p = 0.046) in AP direction. For distal oesophageal tumors, the centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) showed significant differences to those of IGTV(MIP) (p = 0.042) in LR direction. For both middle and distal tumors, the degrees of associations of IGTV(10) outside IGTV(CBCT) significantly correlated with the motion vector (r = 0.540, p = 0.046; r = 0.678, p = 0.031). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four oesophageal cancer patients underwent 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT. GTV(3D), GTV(4D50), internal GTV(MIP) (IGTV(MIP)) and IGTV(CBCT) were delineated on 3DCT, 4DCT(50), 4DCT(MIP) and CBCT. GTVs from 10 respiratory phases were combined to produce GTV(10). Differences in volume, position for different targets, correlation between volume ratio and motion vector were evaluated. The motion vector was the spatial moving of the target centroid position. CONCLUSIONS: IGTV(CBCT) encompasses more motion information than GTV(3D) and GTV(4D50) for upper oesophageal tumors, but slightly less than IGTV(10) for middle and distal oesophageal tumors. IGTV(CBCT) incorporated similar motion information to IGTV(MIP). However, motion information encompassed in CBCT and MIP cannot replace each other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5707044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57070442017-12-07 Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography Hu, Chao-Yue Li, Jian-Bin Wang, Jin-Zhi Wang, Wei Li, Feng-Xiang Guo, Yan-Luan Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: To explore motion information included in 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT by comparing volumetric and positional differences of GTV. RESULTS: Independent of tumor location, significant differences were observed among volumes [IGTV(10) > (IGTV(CBCT) or IGTV(MIP)) > (GTV(3D) or GTV(4D50))]. The underestimations or overestimations between IGTV(10) and IGTV(CBCT) were larger than those between IGTV(10) and IGTV(MIP) (p < 0.001–0.011; p < 0.001–0.023). For upper oesophageal tumors, GTV(4D50)/IGTV(CBCT) negatively correlated with motion vector (r = –0.756, p = 0.011). In AP direction, the centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) differed from GTV(3D), GTV(4D50), IGTV(MIP) and IGTV(10) (p = 0.006, 0.013, 0.038, and 0.010). For middle oesophageal tumors, IGTV(10)/IGTV(CBCT) positively correlated with motion vector (r = 0.695, p = 0.006). The centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) differed from those of IGTV(10) (p = 0.046) in AP direction. For distal oesophageal tumors, the centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) showed significant differences to those of IGTV(MIP) (p = 0.042) in LR direction. For both middle and distal tumors, the degrees of associations of IGTV(10) outside IGTV(CBCT) significantly correlated with the motion vector (r = 0.540, p = 0.046; r = 0.678, p = 0.031). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four oesophageal cancer patients underwent 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT. GTV(3D), GTV(4D50), internal GTV(MIP) (IGTV(MIP)) and IGTV(CBCT) were delineated on 3DCT, 4DCT(50), 4DCT(MIP) and CBCT. GTVs from 10 respiratory phases were combined to produce GTV(10). Differences in volume, position for different targets, correlation between volume ratio and motion vector were evaluated. The motion vector was the spatial moving of the target centroid position. CONCLUSIONS: IGTV(CBCT) encompasses more motion information than GTV(3D) and GTV(4D50) for upper oesophageal tumors, but slightly less than IGTV(10) for middle and distal oesophageal tumors. IGTV(CBCT) incorporated similar motion information to IGTV(MIP). However, motion information encompassed in CBCT and MIP cannot replace each other. Impact Journals LLC 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5707044/ /pubmed/29221150 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21520 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Hu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Hu, Chao-Yue
Li, Jian-Bin
Wang, Jin-Zhi
Wang, Wei
Li, Feng-Xiang
Guo, Yan-Luan
Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography
title Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography
title_full Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography
title_short Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography
title_sort comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29221150
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21520
work_keys_str_mv AT huchaoyue comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT lijianbin comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT wangjinzhi comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT wangwei comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT lifengxiang comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT guoyanluan comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography