Cargando…
Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography
BACKGROUND: To explore motion information included in 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT by comparing volumetric and positional differences of GTV. RESULTS: Independent of tumor location, significant differences were observed among volumes [IGTV(10) > (IGTV(CBCT) or IGTV(MIP)) > (GTV(3D) or GTV(4D50))]. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29221150 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21520 |
_version_ | 1783282343366098944 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Chao-Yue Li, Jian-Bin Wang, Jin-Zhi Wang, Wei Li, Feng-Xiang Guo, Yan-Luan |
author_facet | Hu, Chao-Yue Li, Jian-Bin Wang, Jin-Zhi Wang, Wei Li, Feng-Xiang Guo, Yan-Luan |
author_sort | Hu, Chao-Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To explore motion information included in 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT by comparing volumetric and positional differences of GTV. RESULTS: Independent of tumor location, significant differences were observed among volumes [IGTV(10) > (IGTV(CBCT) or IGTV(MIP)) > (GTV(3D) or GTV(4D50))]. The underestimations or overestimations between IGTV(10) and IGTV(CBCT) were larger than those between IGTV(10) and IGTV(MIP) (p < 0.001–0.011; p < 0.001–0.023). For upper oesophageal tumors, GTV(4D50)/IGTV(CBCT) negatively correlated with motion vector (r = –0.756, p = 0.011). In AP direction, the centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) differed from GTV(3D), GTV(4D50), IGTV(MIP) and IGTV(10) (p = 0.006, 0.013, 0.038, and 0.010). For middle oesophageal tumors, IGTV(10)/IGTV(CBCT) positively correlated with motion vector (r = 0.695, p = 0.006). The centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) differed from those of IGTV(10) (p = 0.046) in AP direction. For distal oesophageal tumors, the centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) showed significant differences to those of IGTV(MIP) (p = 0.042) in LR direction. For both middle and distal tumors, the degrees of associations of IGTV(10) outside IGTV(CBCT) significantly correlated with the motion vector (r = 0.540, p = 0.046; r = 0.678, p = 0.031). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four oesophageal cancer patients underwent 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT. GTV(3D), GTV(4D50), internal GTV(MIP) (IGTV(MIP)) and IGTV(CBCT) were delineated on 3DCT, 4DCT(50), 4DCT(MIP) and CBCT. GTVs from 10 respiratory phases were combined to produce GTV(10). Differences in volume, position for different targets, correlation between volume ratio and motion vector were evaluated. The motion vector was the spatial moving of the target centroid position. CONCLUSIONS: IGTV(CBCT) encompasses more motion information than GTV(3D) and GTV(4D50) for upper oesophageal tumors, but slightly less than IGTV(10) for middle and distal oesophageal tumors. IGTV(CBCT) incorporated similar motion information to IGTV(MIP). However, motion information encompassed in CBCT and MIP cannot replace each other. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5707044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57070442017-12-07 Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography Hu, Chao-Yue Li, Jian-Bin Wang, Jin-Zhi Wang, Wei Li, Feng-Xiang Guo, Yan-Luan Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: To explore motion information included in 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT by comparing volumetric and positional differences of GTV. RESULTS: Independent of tumor location, significant differences were observed among volumes [IGTV(10) > (IGTV(CBCT) or IGTV(MIP)) > (GTV(3D) or GTV(4D50))]. The underestimations or overestimations between IGTV(10) and IGTV(CBCT) were larger than those between IGTV(10) and IGTV(MIP) (p < 0.001–0.011; p < 0.001–0.023). For upper oesophageal tumors, GTV(4D50)/IGTV(CBCT) negatively correlated with motion vector (r = –0.756, p = 0.011). In AP direction, the centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) differed from GTV(3D), GTV(4D50), IGTV(MIP) and IGTV(10) (p = 0.006, 0.013, 0.038, and 0.010). For middle oesophageal tumors, IGTV(10)/IGTV(CBCT) positively correlated with motion vector (r = 0.695, p = 0.006). The centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) differed from those of IGTV(10) (p = 0.046) in AP direction. For distal oesophageal tumors, the centroid coordinates of IGTV(CBCT) showed significant differences to those of IGTV(MIP) (p = 0.042) in LR direction. For both middle and distal tumors, the degrees of associations of IGTV(10) outside IGTV(CBCT) significantly correlated with the motion vector (r = 0.540, p = 0.046; r = 0.678, p = 0.031). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four oesophageal cancer patients underwent 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT. GTV(3D), GTV(4D50), internal GTV(MIP) (IGTV(MIP)) and IGTV(CBCT) were delineated on 3DCT, 4DCT(50), 4DCT(MIP) and CBCT. GTVs from 10 respiratory phases were combined to produce GTV(10). Differences in volume, position for different targets, correlation between volume ratio and motion vector were evaluated. The motion vector was the spatial moving of the target centroid position. CONCLUSIONS: IGTV(CBCT) encompasses more motion information than GTV(3D) and GTV(4D50) for upper oesophageal tumors, but slightly less than IGTV(10) for middle and distal oesophageal tumors. IGTV(CBCT) incorporated similar motion information to IGTV(MIP). However, motion information encompassed in CBCT and MIP cannot replace each other. Impact Journals LLC 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5707044/ /pubmed/29221150 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21520 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Hu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Hu, Chao-Yue Li, Jian-Bin Wang, Jin-Zhi Wang, Wei Li, Feng-Xiang Guo, Yan-Luan Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography |
title | Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography |
title_full | Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography |
title_short | Comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography |
title_sort | comparison of gross tumor volume of primary oesophageal cancer based on contrast-enhanced three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29221150 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huchaoyue comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography AT lijianbin comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography AT wangjinzhi comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography AT wangwei comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography AT lifengxiang comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography AT guoyanluan comparisonofgrosstumorvolumeofprimaryoesophagealcancerbasedoncontrastenhancedthreedimensionalfourdimensionalandconebeamcomputedtomography |