Cargando…

Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, but it remains to be determined whether this reduction translates into a reduction of other complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo, Pierro, Maria, Cavallaro, Giacomo, Mosca, Fabio, Kramer, Boris, Villamor, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29088103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111197
_version_ 1783282482618040320
author Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo
Pierro, Maria
Cavallaro, Giacomo
Mosca, Fabio
Kramer, Boris
Villamor, Eduardo
author_facet Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo
Pierro, Maria
Cavallaro, Giacomo
Mosca, Fabio
Kramer, Boris
Villamor, Eduardo
author_sort Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo
collection PubMed
description Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, but it remains to be determined whether this reduction translates into a reduction of other complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the possible role of probiotics in altering the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Fifteen randomized controlled trials (4782 infants; probiotics: 2406) were included. None of the included studies assessed BPD as the primary outcome. Meta-analysis confirmed a significant reduction of NEC (risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.81, p = 0.004; random effects model), and an almost significant reduction of LOS (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03, p = 0.084). In contrast, meta-analysis could not demonstrate a significant effect of probiotics on BPD, defined either as oxygen dependency at 28 days of life (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.11, p = 0.900, 6 studies) or at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.20, p = 0.203, 12 studies). Meta-regression did not show any significant association between the RR for NEC or LOS and the RR for BPD. In conclusion, our results suggest that NEC and LOS prevention by probiotics does not affect the risk of developing BPD in preterm infants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5707669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57076692017-12-05 Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo Pierro, Maria Cavallaro, Giacomo Mosca, Fabio Kramer, Boris Villamor, Eduardo Nutrients Review Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, but it remains to be determined whether this reduction translates into a reduction of other complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the possible role of probiotics in altering the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Fifteen randomized controlled trials (4782 infants; probiotics: 2406) were included. None of the included studies assessed BPD as the primary outcome. Meta-analysis confirmed a significant reduction of NEC (risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.81, p = 0.004; random effects model), and an almost significant reduction of LOS (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03, p = 0.084). In contrast, meta-analysis could not demonstrate a significant effect of probiotics on BPD, defined either as oxygen dependency at 28 days of life (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.11, p = 0.900, 6 studies) or at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.20, p = 0.203, 12 studies). Meta-regression did not show any significant association between the RR for NEC or LOS and the RR for BPD. In conclusion, our results suggest that NEC and LOS prevention by probiotics does not affect the risk of developing BPD in preterm infants. MDPI 2017-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5707669/ /pubmed/29088103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111197 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo
Pierro, Maria
Cavallaro, Giacomo
Mosca, Fabio
Kramer, Boris
Villamor, Eduardo
Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort probiotic supplementation in preterm infants does not affect the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29088103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111197
work_keys_str_mv AT villamormartinezeduardo probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT pierromaria probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cavallarogiacomo probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT moscafabio probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kramerboris probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT villamoreduardo probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials