Cargando…
Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, but it remains to be determined whether this reduction translates into a reduction of other complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29088103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111197 |
_version_ | 1783282482618040320 |
---|---|
author | Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo Pierro, Maria Cavallaro, Giacomo Mosca, Fabio Kramer, Boris Villamor, Eduardo |
author_facet | Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo Pierro, Maria Cavallaro, Giacomo Mosca, Fabio Kramer, Boris Villamor, Eduardo |
author_sort | Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, but it remains to be determined whether this reduction translates into a reduction of other complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the possible role of probiotics in altering the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Fifteen randomized controlled trials (4782 infants; probiotics: 2406) were included. None of the included studies assessed BPD as the primary outcome. Meta-analysis confirmed a significant reduction of NEC (risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.81, p = 0.004; random effects model), and an almost significant reduction of LOS (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03, p = 0.084). In contrast, meta-analysis could not demonstrate a significant effect of probiotics on BPD, defined either as oxygen dependency at 28 days of life (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.11, p = 0.900, 6 studies) or at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.20, p = 0.203, 12 studies). Meta-regression did not show any significant association between the RR for NEC or LOS and the RR for BPD. In conclusion, our results suggest that NEC and LOS prevention by probiotics does not affect the risk of developing BPD in preterm infants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5707669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57076692017-12-05 Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo Pierro, Maria Cavallaro, Giacomo Mosca, Fabio Kramer, Boris Villamor, Eduardo Nutrients Review Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, but it remains to be determined whether this reduction translates into a reduction of other complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the possible role of probiotics in altering the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Fifteen randomized controlled trials (4782 infants; probiotics: 2406) were included. None of the included studies assessed BPD as the primary outcome. Meta-analysis confirmed a significant reduction of NEC (risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.81, p = 0.004; random effects model), and an almost significant reduction of LOS (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03, p = 0.084). In contrast, meta-analysis could not demonstrate a significant effect of probiotics on BPD, defined either as oxygen dependency at 28 days of life (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.11, p = 0.900, 6 studies) or at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.20, p = 0.203, 12 studies). Meta-regression did not show any significant association between the RR for NEC or LOS and the RR for BPD. In conclusion, our results suggest that NEC and LOS prevention by probiotics does not affect the risk of developing BPD in preterm infants. MDPI 2017-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5707669/ /pubmed/29088103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111197 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Villamor-Martínez, Eduardo Pierro, Maria Cavallaro, Giacomo Mosca, Fabio Kramer, Boris Villamor, Eduardo Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Probiotic Supplementation in Preterm Infants Does Not Affect the Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | probiotic supplementation in preterm infants does not affect the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29088103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villamormartinezeduardo probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT pierromaria probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cavallarogiacomo probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT moscafabio probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kramerboris probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT villamoreduardo probioticsupplementationinpreterminfantsdoesnotaffecttheriskofbronchopulmonarydysplasiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |