Cargando…
Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer
Dietary factors play a major role in the development of colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the reproducibility and validity of a 109-food item Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to measure the consumption of foods and nutrients related to the development of colorectal cancer in a population age...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111257 |
_version_ | 1783282497412399104 |
---|---|
author | Tollosa, Daniel Nigusse Van Camp, John Huybrechts, Inge Huybregts, Lieven Van Loco, Joris De Smet, Stefaan Sterck, Ellen Rabâi, Céline Van Hecke, Thomas Vanhaecke, Lynn Vossen, Els Peeters, Marc Lachat, Carl |
author_facet | Tollosa, Daniel Nigusse Van Camp, John Huybrechts, Inge Huybregts, Lieven Van Loco, Joris De Smet, Stefaan Sterck, Ellen Rabâi, Céline Van Hecke, Thomas Vanhaecke, Lynn Vossen, Els Peeters, Marc Lachat, Carl |
author_sort | Tollosa, Daniel Nigusse |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dietary factors play a major role in the development of colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the reproducibility and validity of a 109-food item Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to measure the consumption of foods and nutrients related to the development of colorectal cancer in a population aged ≥50 years in Flanders, Belgium. A semi-quantitative FFQ was administered two times in a period of two weeks to evaluate reproducibility (FFQ1 and FFQ2). The validity of the FFQ was assessed by comparing FFQ1 against the 3-day diary method (3 DD). A total of 162 respondents (mean age 57.5 years) provided data for the FFQ, of whom 156 also participated in the validity assessment. Mean differences in the intake of foods and nutrients between FFQ1 and FFQ2 were, overall, small and statistically insignificant. However, a higher estimation was observed by FFQ1 as compared to the 3-DD method for the majority of food groups and nutrient intake in the validity assessment. A systematic mean difference (g/day) was observed for eight food groups in the Bland–Altman agreement test; the largest was for fruit intake. Regarding the nutrients, a systematic mean difference was observed in calcium, fat, and vitamin D intake. Overall, the reproducibility of the FFQ was good, and its validity could be satisfactory for estimating absolute food and nutrient intakes and ranking individuals according to high and low intake categories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5707729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57077292017-12-05 Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer Tollosa, Daniel Nigusse Van Camp, John Huybrechts, Inge Huybregts, Lieven Van Loco, Joris De Smet, Stefaan Sterck, Ellen Rabâi, Céline Van Hecke, Thomas Vanhaecke, Lynn Vossen, Els Peeters, Marc Lachat, Carl Nutrients Article Dietary factors play a major role in the development of colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the reproducibility and validity of a 109-food item Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to measure the consumption of foods and nutrients related to the development of colorectal cancer in a population aged ≥50 years in Flanders, Belgium. A semi-quantitative FFQ was administered two times in a period of two weeks to evaluate reproducibility (FFQ1 and FFQ2). The validity of the FFQ was assessed by comparing FFQ1 against the 3-day diary method (3 DD). A total of 162 respondents (mean age 57.5 years) provided data for the FFQ, of whom 156 also participated in the validity assessment. Mean differences in the intake of foods and nutrients between FFQ1 and FFQ2 were, overall, small and statistically insignificant. However, a higher estimation was observed by FFQ1 as compared to the 3-DD method for the majority of food groups and nutrient intake in the validity assessment. A systematic mean difference (g/day) was observed for eight food groups in the Bland–Altman agreement test; the largest was for fruit intake. Regarding the nutrients, a systematic mean difference was observed in calcium, fat, and vitamin D intake. Overall, the reproducibility of the FFQ was good, and its validity could be satisfactory for estimating absolute food and nutrient intakes and ranking individuals according to high and low intake categories. MDPI 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5707729/ /pubmed/29149033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111257 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tollosa, Daniel Nigusse Van Camp, John Huybrechts, Inge Huybregts, Lieven Van Loco, Joris De Smet, Stefaan Sterck, Ellen Rabâi, Céline Van Hecke, Thomas Vanhaecke, Lynn Vossen, Els Peeters, Marc Lachat, Carl Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer |
title | Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer |
title_full | Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer |
title_short | Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer |
title_sort | validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire for dietary factors related to colorectal cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9111257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tollosadanielnigusse validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT vancampjohn validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT huybrechtsinge validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT huybregtslieven validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT vanlocojoris validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT desmetstefaan validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT sterckellen validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT rabaiceline validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT vanheckethomas validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT vanhaeckelynn validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT vossenels validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT peetersmarc validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer AT lachatcarl validityandreproducibilityofafoodfrequencyquestionnairefordietaryfactorsrelatedtocolorectalcancer |