Cargando…

Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system

BACKGROUND: The Swiss health system is customer-driven with fee-for-service paiement scheme and universal coverage. It is highly performing but expensive and health information systems are scarcely implemented. The Swiss Primary Care Active Monitoring (SPAM) program aims to develop an instrument abl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebert, Sonja T., Pittet, Valérie, Cornuz, Jacques, Senn, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z
_version_ 1783282508232654848
author Ebert, Sonja T.
Pittet, Valérie
Cornuz, Jacques
Senn, Nicolas
author_facet Ebert, Sonja T.
Pittet, Valérie
Cornuz, Jacques
Senn, Nicolas
author_sort Ebert, Sonja T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Swiss health system is customer-driven with fee-for-service paiement scheme and universal coverage. It is highly performing but expensive and health information systems are scarcely implemented. The Swiss Primary Care Active Monitoring (SPAM) program aims to develop an instrument able to describe the performance and effectiveness of the Swiss PC system. METHODS: Based on a Literature review we developed a conceptual framework and selected indicators according to their ability to reflect the Swiss PC system. A two round modified RAND method with 24 inter−/national experts took place to select primary/secondary indicators (validity, clarity, agreement). A limited set of priority indicators was selected (importance, priority) in a third round. RESULTS: A conceptual framework covering three domains (structure, process, outcome) subdivided into twelve sections (funding, access, organisation/ workflow of resources, (Para-)Medical training, management of knowledge, clinical−/interpersonal care, health status, satisfaction of PC providers/ consumers, equity) was generated. 365 indicators were pre-selected and 335 were finally retained. 56 were kept as priority indicators.- Among the remaining, 199 were identified as primary and 80 as secondary indicators. All domains and sections are represented. CONCLUSION: The development of the SPAM program allowed the construction of a consensual instrument in a traditionally unregulated health system through a modified RAND method. The selected 56 priority indicators render the SPAM instrument a comprehensive tool supporting a better understanding of the Swiss PC system’s performance and effectiveness as well as in identifying potential ways to improve quality of care. Further challenges will be to update indicators regularly and to assess validity and sensitivity-to-change over time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5707782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57077822017-12-06 Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system Ebert, Sonja T. Pittet, Valérie Cornuz, Jacques Senn, Nicolas BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Swiss health system is customer-driven with fee-for-service paiement scheme and universal coverage. It is highly performing but expensive and health information systems are scarcely implemented. The Swiss Primary Care Active Monitoring (SPAM) program aims to develop an instrument able to describe the performance and effectiveness of the Swiss PC system. METHODS: Based on a Literature review we developed a conceptual framework and selected indicators according to their ability to reflect the Swiss PC system. A two round modified RAND method with 24 inter−/national experts took place to select primary/secondary indicators (validity, clarity, agreement). A limited set of priority indicators was selected (importance, priority) in a third round. RESULTS: A conceptual framework covering three domains (structure, process, outcome) subdivided into twelve sections (funding, access, organisation/ workflow of resources, (Para-)Medical training, management of knowledge, clinical−/interpersonal care, health status, satisfaction of PC providers/ consumers, equity) was generated. 365 indicators were pre-selected and 335 were finally retained. 56 were kept as priority indicators.- Among the remaining, 199 were identified as primary and 80 as secondary indicators. All domains and sections are represented. CONCLUSION: The development of the SPAM program allowed the construction of a consensual instrument in a traditionally unregulated health system through a modified RAND method. The selected 56 priority indicators render the SPAM instrument a comprehensive tool supporting a better understanding of the Swiss PC system’s performance and effectiveness as well as in identifying potential ways to improve quality of care. Further challenges will be to update indicators regularly and to assess validity and sensitivity-to-change over time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5707782/ /pubmed/29187196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ebert, Sonja T.
Pittet, Valérie
Cornuz, Jacques
Senn, Nicolas
Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system
title Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system
title_full Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system
title_fullStr Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system
title_full_unstemmed Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system
title_short Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system
title_sort development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the swiss primary care system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ebertsonjat developmentofamonitoringinstrumenttoassesstheperformanceoftheswissprimarycaresystem
AT pittetvalerie developmentofamonitoringinstrumenttoassesstheperformanceoftheswissprimarycaresystem
AT cornuzjacques developmentofamonitoringinstrumenttoassesstheperformanceoftheswissprimarycaresystem
AT sennnicolas developmentofamonitoringinstrumenttoassesstheperformanceoftheswissprimarycaresystem