Cargando…
Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system
BACKGROUND: The Swiss health system is customer-driven with fee-for-service paiement scheme and universal coverage. It is highly performing but expensive and health information systems are scarcely implemented. The Swiss Primary Care Active Monitoring (SPAM) program aims to develop an instrument abl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z |
_version_ | 1783282508232654848 |
---|---|
author | Ebert, Sonja T. Pittet, Valérie Cornuz, Jacques Senn, Nicolas |
author_facet | Ebert, Sonja T. Pittet, Valérie Cornuz, Jacques Senn, Nicolas |
author_sort | Ebert, Sonja T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Swiss health system is customer-driven with fee-for-service paiement scheme and universal coverage. It is highly performing but expensive and health information systems are scarcely implemented. The Swiss Primary Care Active Monitoring (SPAM) program aims to develop an instrument able to describe the performance and effectiveness of the Swiss PC system. METHODS: Based on a Literature review we developed a conceptual framework and selected indicators according to their ability to reflect the Swiss PC system. A two round modified RAND method with 24 inter−/national experts took place to select primary/secondary indicators (validity, clarity, agreement). A limited set of priority indicators was selected (importance, priority) in a third round. RESULTS: A conceptual framework covering three domains (structure, process, outcome) subdivided into twelve sections (funding, access, organisation/ workflow of resources, (Para-)Medical training, management of knowledge, clinical−/interpersonal care, health status, satisfaction of PC providers/ consumers, equity) was generated. 365 indicators were pre-selected and 335 were finally retained. 56 were kept as priority indicators.- Among the remaining, 199 were identified as primary and 80 as secondary indicators. All domains and sections are represented. CONCLUSION: The development of the SPAM program allowed the construction of a consensual instrument in a traditionally unregulated health system through a modified RAND method. The selected 56 priority indicators render the SPAM instrument a comprehensive tool supporting a better understanding of the Swiss PC system’s performance and effectiveness as well as in identifying potential ways to improve quality of care. Further challenges will be to update indicators regularly and to assess validity and sensitivity-to-change over time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5707782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57077822017-12-06 Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system Ebert, Sonja T. Pittet, Valérie Cornuz, Jacques Senn, Nicolas BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Swiss health system is customer-driven with fee-for-service paiement scheme and universal coverage. It is highly performing but expensive and health information systems are scarcely implemented. The Swiss Primary Care Active Monitoring (SPAM) program aims to develop an instrument able to describe the performance and effectiveness of the Swiss PC system. METHODS: Based on a Literature review we developed a conceptual framework and selected indicators according to their ability to reflect the Swiss PC system. A two round modified RAND method with 24 inter−/national experts took place to select primary/secondary indicators (validity, clarity, agreement). A limited set of priority indicators was selected (importance, priority) in a third round. RESULTS: A conceptual framework covering three domains (structure, process, outcome) subdivided into twelve sections (funding, access, organisation/ workflow of resources, (Para-)Medical training, management of knowledge, clinical−/interpersonal care, health status, satisfaction of PC providers/ consumers, equity) was generated. 365 indicators were pre-selected and 335 were finally retained. 56 were kept as priority indicators.- Among the remaining, 199 were identified as primary and 80 as secondary indicators. All domains and sections are represented. CONCLUSION: The development of the SPAM program allowed the construction of a consensual instrument in a traditionally unregulated health system through a modified RAND method. The selected 56 priority indicators render the SPAM instrument a comprehensive tool supporting a better understanding of the Swiss PC system’s performance and effectiveness as well as in identifying potential ways to improve quality of care. Further challenges will be to update indicators regularly and to assess validity and sensitivity-to-change over time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5707782/ /pubmed/29187196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ebert, Sonja T. Pittet, Valérie Cornuz, Jacques Senn, Nicolas Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system |
title | Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system |
title_full | Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system |
title_fullStr | Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system |
title_short | Development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the Swiss primary care system |
title_sort | development of a monitoring instrument to assess the performance of the swiss primary care system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebertsonjat developmentofamonitoringinstrumenttoassesstheperformanceoftheswissprimarycaresystem AT pittetvalerie developmentofamonitoringinstrumenttoassesstheperformanceoftheswissprimarycaresystem AT cornuzjacques developmentofamonitoringinstrumenttoassesstheperformanceoftheswissprimarycaresystem AT sennnicolas developmentofamonitoringinstrumenttoassesstheperformanceoftheswissprimarycaresystem |