Cargando…

Comfort, Energy Efficiency and Adoption of Personal Cooling Systems in Warm Environments: A Field Experimental Study

It is well known that personal cooling improves thermal comfort and save energy. This study aims to: (1) compare different personal cooling systems and (2) understand what influences users’ willingness to adopt them. A series of experiments on several types of personal cooling systems, which include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Yingdong, Li, Nianping, Wang, Xiang, He, Meiling, He, De
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149078
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111408
_version_ 1783282575142289408
author He, Yingdong
Li, Nianping
Wang, Xiang
He, Meiling
He, De
author_facet He, Yingdong
Li, Nianping
Wang, Xiang
He, Meiling
He, De
author_sort He, Yingdong
collection PubMed
description It is well known that personal cooling improves thermal comfort and save energy. This study aims to: (1) compare different personal cooling systems and (2) understand what influences users’ willingness to adopt them. A series of experiments on several types of personal cooling systems, which included physical measurements, questionnaires and feedback, was conducted in a real office environment. The obtained results showed that personal cooling improved comfort of participants in warm environments. Then an improved index was proposed and used to compare different types of personal cooling systems in terms of comfort and energy efficiency simultaneously. According to the improved index, desk fans were highly energy-efficient, while the hybrid personal cooling (the combination of radiant cooling desk and desk fan) consumed more energy but showed advantages of extending the comfortable temperature range. Moreover, if personal cooling was free, most participants were willing to adopt it and the effectiveness was the main factor influencing their willingness, whereas if participants had to pay, they probably refused to adopt it due to the cost and the availability of conventional air conditioners. Thus, providing effective and free personal cooling systems should be regarded as a better way for its wider application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5708047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57080472017-12-05 Comfort, Energy Efficiency and Adoption of Personal Cooling Systems in Warm Environments: A Field Experimental Study He, Yingdong Li, Nianping Wang, Xiang He, Meiling He, De Int J Environ Res Public Health Article It is well known that personal cooling improves thermal comfort and save energy. This study aims to: (1) compare different personal cooling systems and (2) understand what influences users’ willingness to adopt them. A series of experiments on several types of personal cooling systems, which included physical measurements, questionnaires and feedback, was conducted in a real office environment. The obtained results showed that personal cooling improved comfort of participants in warm environments. Then an improved index was proposed and used to compare different types of personal cooling systems in terms of comfort and energy efficiency simultaneously. According to the improved index, desk fans were highly energy-efficient, while the hybrid personal cooling (the combination of radiant cooling desk and desk fan) consumed more energy but showed advantages of extending the comfortable temperature range. Moreover, if personal cooling was free, most participants were willing to adopt it and the effectiveness was the main factor influencing their willingness, whereas if participants had to pay, they probably refused to adopt it due to the cost and the availability of conventional air conditioners. Thus, providing effective and free personal cooling systems should be regarded as a better way for its wider application. MDPI 2017-11-17 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5708047/ /pubmed/29149078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111408 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
He, Yingdong
Li, Nianping
Wang, Xiang
He, Meiling
He, De
Comfort, Energy Efficiency and Adoption of Personal Cooling Systems in Warm Environments: A Field Experimental Study
title Comfort, Energy Efficiency and Adoption of Personal Cooling Systems in Warm Environments: A Field Experimental Study
title_full Comfort, Energy Efficiency and Adoption of Personal Cooling Systems in Warm Environments: A Field Experimental Study
title_fullStr Comfort, Energy Efficiency and Adoption of Personal Cooling Systems in Warm Environments: A Field Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed Comfort, Energy Efficiency and Adoption of Personal Cooling Systems in Warm Environments: A Field Experimental Study
title_short Comfort, Energy Efficiency and Adoption of Personal Cooling Systems in Warm Environments: A Field Experimental Study
title_sort comfort, energy efficiency and adoption of personal cooling systems in warm environments: a field experimental study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149078
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111408
work_keys_str_mv AT heyingdong comfortenergyefficiencyandadoptionofpersonalcoolingsystemsinwarmenvironmentsafieldexperimentalstudy
AT linianping comfortenergyefficiencyandadoptionofpersonalcoolingsystemsinwarmenvironmentsafieldexperimentalstudy
AT wangxiang comfortenergyefficiencyandadoptionofpersonalcoolingsystemsinwarmenvironmentsafieldexperimentalstudy
AT hemeiling comfortenergyefficiencyandadoptionofpersonalcoolingsystemsinwarmenvironmentsafieldexperimentalstudy
AT hede comfortenergyefficiencyandadoptionofpersonalcoolingsystemsinwarmenvironmentsafieldexperimentalstudy