Cargando…
Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
Internet-based surveillance methods for vector-borne diseases (VBDs) using “big data” sources such as Google, Twitter, and internet newswire scraping have recently been developed, yet reviews on such “digital disease detection” methods have focused on respiratory pathogens, particularly in high-inco...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005871 |
_version_ | 1783282642131615744 |
---|---|
author | Pollett, Simon Althouse, Benjamin M. Forshey, Brett Rutherford, George W. Jarman, Richard G. |
author_facet | Pollett, Simon Althouse, Benjamin M. Forshey, Brett Rutherford, George W. Jarman, Richard G. |
author_sort | Pollett, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Internet-based surveillance methods for vector-borne diseases (VBDs) using “big data” sources such as Google, Twitter, and internet newswire scraping have recently been developed, yet reviews on such “digital disease detection” methods have focused on respiratory pathogens, particularly in high-income regions. Here, we present a narrative review of the literature that has examined the performance of internet-based biosurveillance for diseases caused by vector-borne viruses, parasites, and other pathogens, including Zika, dengue, other arthropod-borne viruses, malaria, leishmaniasis, and Lyme disease across a range of settings, including low- and middle-income countries. The fundamental features, advantages, and drawbacks of each internet big data source are presented for those with varying familiarity of “digital epidemiology.” We conclude with some of the challenges and future directions in using internet-based biosurveillance for the surveillance and control of VBD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5708615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57086152017-12-15 Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties? Pollett, Simon Althouse, Benjamin M. Forshey, Brett Rutherford, George W. Jarman, Richard G. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Review Internet-based surveillance methods for vector-borne diseases (VBDs) using “big data” sources such as Google, Twitter, and internet newswire scraping have recently been developed, yet reviews on such “digital disease detection” methods have focused on respiratory pathogens, particularly in high-income regions. Here, we present a narrative review of the literature that has examined the performance of internet-based biosurveillance for diseases caused by vector-borne viruses, parasites, and other pathogens, including Zika, dengue, other arthropod-borne viruses, malaria, leishmaniasis, and Lyme disease across a range of settings, including low- and middle-income countries. The fundamental features, advantages, and drawbacks of each internet big data source are presented for those with varying familiarity of “digital epidemiology.” We conclude with some of the challenges and future directions in using internet-based biosurveillance for the surveillance and control of VBD. Public Library of Science 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5708615/ /pubmed/29190281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005871 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Review Pollett, Simon Althouse, Benjamin M. Forshey, Brett Rutherford, George W. Jarman, Richard G. Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties? |
title | Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties? |
title_full | Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties? |
title_fullStr | Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties? |
title_full_unstemmed | Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties? |
title_short | Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties? |
title_sort | internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: are they novel public health tools or just novelties? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pollettsimon internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties AT althousebenjaminm internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties AT forsheybrett internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties AT rutherfordgeorgew internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties AT jarmanrichardg internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties |