Cargando…

Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?

Internet-based surveillance methods for vector-borne diseases (VBDs) using “big data” sources such as Google, Twitter, and internet newswire scraping have recently been developed, yet reviews on such “digital disease detection” methods have focused on respiratory pathogens, particularly in high-inco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollett, Simon, Althouse, Benjamin M., Forshey, Brett, Rutherford, George W., Jarman, Richard G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005871
_version_ 1783282642131615744
author Pollett, Simon
Althouse, Benjamin M.
Forshey, Brett
Rutherford, George W.
Jarman, Richard G.
author_facet Pollett, Simon
Althouse, Benjamin M.
Forshey, Brett
Rutherford, George W.
Jarman, Richard G.
author_sort Pollett, Simon
collection PubMed
description Internet-based surveillance methods for vector-borne diseases (VBDs) using “big data” sources such as Google, Twitter, and internet newswire scraping have recently been developed, yet reviews on such “digital disease detection” methods have focused on respiratory pathogens, particularly in high-income regions. Here, we present a narrative review of the literature that has examined the performance of internet-based biosurveillance for diseases caused by vector-borne viruses, parasites, and other pathogens, including Zika, dengue, other arthropod-borne viruses, malaria, leishmaniasis, and Lyme disease across a range of settings, including low- and middle-income countries. The fundamental features, advantages, and drawbacks of each internet big data source are presented for those with varying familiarity of “digital epidemiology.” We conclude with some of the challenges and future directions in using internet-based biosurveillance for the surveillance and control of VBD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5708615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57086152017-12-15 Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties? Pollett, Simon Althouse, Benjamin M. Forshey, Brett Rutherford, George W. Jarman, Richard G. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Review Internet-based surveillance methods for vector-borne diseases (VBDs) using “big data” sources such as Google, Twitter, and internet newswire scraping have recently been developed, yet reviews on such “digital disease detection” methods have focused on respiratory pathogens, particularly in high-income regions. Here, we present a narrative review of the literature that has examined the performance of internet-based biosurveillance for diseases caused by vector-borne viruses, parasites, and other pathogens, including Zika, dengue, other arthropod-borne viruses, malaria, leishmaniasis, and Lyme disease across a range of settings, including low- and middle-income countries. The fundamental features, advantages, and drawbacks of each internet big data source are presented for those with varying familiarity of “digital epidemiology.” We conclude with some of the challenges and future directions in using internet-based biosurveillance for the surveillance and control of VBD. Public Library of Science 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5708615/ /pubmed/29190281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005871 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Review
Pollett, Simon
Althouse, Benjamin M.
Forshey, Brett
Rutherford, George W.
Jarman, Richard G.
Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
title Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
title_full Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
title_fullStr Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
title_full_unstemmed Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
title_short Internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: Are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
title_sort internet-based biosurveillance methods for vector-borne diseases: are they novel public health tools or just novelties?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005871
work_keys_str_mv AT pollettsimon internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties
AT althousebenjaminm internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties
AT forsheybrett internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties
AT rutherfordgeorgew internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties
AT jarmanrichardg internetbasedbiosurveillancemethodsforvectorbornediseasesaretheynovelpublichealthtoolsorjustnovelties