Cargando…
Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
Neuropathic pain is clinically described as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Dutch version of the DN4, in a cross-sectional multicentre design, as a screening tool for detecting a neuropathic pain componen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187961 |
_version_ | 1783282646612180992 |
---|---|
author | Timmerman, Hans Steegers, Monique A. H. Huygen, Frank J. P. M. Goeman, Jelle J. van Dasselaar, Nick T. Schenkels, Marcel J. Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G. Wolff, André P. Vissers, Kris C. P. |
author_facet | Timmerman, Hans Steegers, Monique A. H. Huygen, Frank J. P. M. Goeman, Jelle J. van Dasselaar, Nick T. Schenkels, Marcel J. Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G. Wolff, André P. Vissers, Kris C. P. |
author_sort | Timmerman, Hans |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neuropathic pain is clinically described as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Dutch version of the DN4, in a cross-sectional multicentre design, as a screening tool for detecting a neuropathic pain component in a large consecutive, not pre-stratified on basis of the target outcome, population of patients with chronic pain. Patients’ pain was classified by two independent (pain-)physicians as the gold standard. The analysis was initially performed on the outcomes of those patients (n = 228 out of 291) in whom both physicians agreed in their pain classification. Compared to the gold standard the DN4 had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 76%. The DN4-symptoms (seven interview items) solely resulted in a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 67%. For the DN4-signs (three examination items) it was respectively 75% and 75%. In conclusion, because it seems that the DN4 helps to identify a neuropathic pain component in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain in a moderate way, a comprehensive (physical-) examination by the physician is still obligate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5708633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57086332017-12-15 Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain Timmerman, Hans Steegers, Monique A. H. Huygen, Frank J. P. M. Goeman, Jelle J. van Dasselaar, Nick T. Schenkels, Marcel J. Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G. Wolff, André P. Vissers, Kris C. P. PLoS One Research Article Neuropathic pain is clinically described as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Dutch version of the DN4, in a cross-sectional multicentre design, as a screening tool for detecting a neuropathic pain component in a large consecutive, not pre-stratified on basis of the target outcome, population of patients with chronic pain. Patients’ pain was classified by two independent (pain-)physicians as the gold standard. The analysis was initially performed on the outcomes of those patients (n = 228 out of 291) in whom both physicians agreed in their pain classification. Compared to the gold standard the DN4 had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 76%. The DN4-symptoms (seven interview items) solely resulted in a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 67%. For the DN4-signs (three examination items) it was respectively 75% and 75%. In conclusion, because it seems that the DN4 helps to identify a neuropathic pain component in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain in a moderate way, a comprehensive (physical-) examination by the physician is still obligate. Public Library of Science 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5708633/ /pubmed/29190718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187961 Text en © 2017 Timmerman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Timmerman, Hans Steegers, Monique A. H. Huygen, Frank J. P. M. Goeman, Jelle J. van Dasselaar, Nick T. Schenkels, Marcel J. Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G. Wolff, André P. Vissers, Kris C. P. Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain |
title | Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain |
title_full | Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain |
title_fullStr | Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain |
title_short | Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain |
title_sort | investigating the validity of the dn4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timmermanhans investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain AT steegersmoniqueah investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain AT huygenfrankjpm investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain AT goemanjellej investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain AT vandasselaarnickt investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain AT schenkelsmarcelj investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain AT wildersmitholiverhg investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain AT wolffandrep investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain AT visserskriscp investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain |