Cargando…

Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain

Neuropathic pain is clinically described as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Dutch version of the DN4, in a cross-sectional multicentre design, as a screening tool for detecting a neuropathic pain componen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timmerman, Hans, Steegers, Monique A. H., Huygen, Frank J. P. M., Goeman, Jelle J., van Dasselaar, Nick T., Schenkels, Marcel J., Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G., Wolff, André P., Vissers, Kris C. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187961
_version_ 1783282646612180992
author Timmerman, Hans
Steegers, Monique A. H.
Huygen, Frank J. P. M.
Goeman, Jelle J.
van Dasselaar, Nick T.
Schenkels, Marcel J.
Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G.
Wolff, André P.
Vissers, Kris C. P.
author_facet Timmerman, Hans
Steegers, Monique A. H.
Huygen, Frank J. P. M.
Goeman, Jelle J.
van Dasselaar, Nick T.
Schenkels, Marcel J.
Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G.
Wolff, André P.
Vissers, Kris C. P.
author_sort Timmerman, Hans
collection PubMed
description Neuropathic pain is clinically described as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Dutch version of the DN4, in a cross-sectional multicentre design, as a screening tool for detecting a neuropathic pain component in a large consecutive, not pre-stratified on basis of the target outcome, population of patients with chronic pain. Patients’ pain was classified by two independent (pain-)physicians as the gold standard. The analysis was initially performed on the outcomes of those patients (n = 228 out of 291) in whom both physicians agreed in their pain classification. Compared to the gold standard the DN4 had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 76%. The DN4-symptoms (seven interview items) solely resulted in a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 67%. For the DN4-signs (three examination items) it was respectively 75% and 75%. In conclusion, because it seems that the DN4 helps to identify a neuropathic pain component in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain in a moderate way, a comprehensive (physical-) examination by the physician is still obligate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5708633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57086332017-12-15 Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain Timmerman, Hans Steegers, Monique A. H. Huygen, Frank J. P. M. Goeman, Jelle J. van Dasselaar, Nick T. Schenkels, Marcel J. Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G. Wolff, André P. Vissers, Kris C. P. PLoS One Research Article Neuropathic pain is clinically described as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Dutch version of the DN4, in a cross-sectional multicentre design, as a screening tool for detecting a neuropathic pain component in a large consecutive, not pre-stratified on basis of the target outcome, population of patients with chronic pain. Patients’ pain was classified by two independent (pain-)physicians as the gold standard. The analysis was initially performed on the outcomes of those patients (n = 228 out of 291) in whom both physicians agreed in their pain classification. Compared to the gold standard the DN4 had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 76%. The DN4-symptoms (seven interview items) solely resulted in a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 67%. For the DN4-signs (three examination items) it was respectively 75% and 75%. In conclusion, because it seems that the DN4 helps to identify a neuropathic pain component in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain in a moderate way, a comprehensive (physical-) examination by the physician is still obligate. Public Library of Science 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5708633/ /pubmed/29190718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187961 Text en © 2017 Timmerman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Timmerman, Hans
Steegers, Monique A. H.
Huygen, Frank J. P. M.
Goeman, Jelle J.
van Dasselaar, Nick T.
Schenkels, Marcel J.
Wilder-Smith, Oliver H. G.
Wolff, André P.
Vissers, Kris C. P.
Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
title Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
title_full Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
title_fullStr Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
title_short Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
title_sort investigating the validity of the dn4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187961
work_keys_str_mv AT timmermanhans investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT steegersmoniqueah investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT huygenfrankjpm investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT goemanjellej investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT vandasselaarnickt investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT schenkelsmarcelj investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT wildersmitholiverhg investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT wolffandrep investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT visserskriscp investigatingthevalidityofthedn4inaconsecutivepopulationofpatientswithchronicpain