Cargando…

Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients: Did the Treatments Improve Their Outcomes?

STUDY DESIGN. A retrospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE. Investigation of the changes in the treatment outcomes of patients with lung cancer derived metastatic spine tumors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Metastatic spine tumors derived from lung cancer had been progressive, and their prognosis i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uei, Hiroshi, Tokuhashi, Yasuaki, Maseda, Masafumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28816829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002382
_version_ 1783282667112890368
author Uei, Hiroshi
Tokuhashi, Yasuaki
Maseda, Masafumi
author_facet Uei, Hiroshi
Tokuhashi, Yasuaki
Maseda, Masafumi
author_sort Uei, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN. A retrospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE. Investigation of the changes in the treatment outcomes of patients with lung cancer derived metastatic spine tumors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Metastatic spine tumors derived from lung cancer had been progressive, and their prognosis is poor. It has recently been reported that the use of molecularly targeted drugs and bone-modifying agents (BMAs) improved the treatment outcomes of patients with lung cancer, but no detailed information about the treatment of metastatic spine tumors has been reported. METHODS. Two hundred seven patients with lung cancer derived metastatic spine tumors who were examined after 2000 were analyzed. They were divided into 54 patients who were treated in or before 2005 (surgical treatment: 25 patients, conservative treatment: 29 patients) (group B) and 153 patients who were treated from 2006 onwards, when a molecularly targeted drug and BMA were introduced (surgical treatment: 24, conservative treatment: 129) (group A), and the treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS. Significant differences in age and the affected vertebral level, paralysis grade, and Tokuhashi score (general condition, the number of vertebral metastases, and the total score) were detected between the groups. Regarding treatment outcomes, the mean duration of the post-treatment survival period was 5.1 and 9.3 months in groups B and A, respectively, that is, it was significantly longer in group A (P < 0.05). No significant intergroup difference in pain improvement was noted, and no significant post-treatment improvement in paralysis was achieved in either group. The post-treatment discharge-to-home eligibility rate did not differ significantly between the groups, but the Barthel Index improved significantly after treatment in group A (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION. After molecularly targeted drugs and BMA were introduced as treatments for lung cancer derived metastatic spine tumors, the survival periods of patients with such tumors increased, and their activity of daily living after treatment improved. Level of Evidence: 4
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5708716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57087162017-12-11 Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients: Did the Treatments Improve Their Outcomes? Uei, Hiroshi Tokuhashi, Yasuaki Maseda, Masafumi Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Outcomes STUDY DESIGN. A retrospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE. Investigation of the changes in the treatment outcomes of patients with lung cancer derived metastatic spine tumors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Metastatic spine tumors derived from lung cancer had been progressive, and their prognosis is poor. It has recently been reported that the use of molecularly targeted drugs and bone-modifying agents (BMAs) improved the treatment outcomes of patients with lung cancer, but no detailed information about the treatment of metastatic spine tumors has been reported. METHODS. Two hundred seven patients with lung cancer derived metastatic spine tumors who were examined after 2000 were analyzed. They were divided into 54 patients who were treated in or before 2005 (surgical treatment: 25 patients, conservative treatment: 29 patients) (group B) and 153 patients who were treated from 2006 onwards, when a molecularly targeted drug and BMA were introduced (surgical treatment: 24, conservative treatment: 129) (group A), and the treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS. Significant differences in age and the affected vertebral level, paralysis grade, and Tokuhashi score (general condition, the number of vertebral metastases, and the total score) were detected between the groups. Regarding treatment outcomes, the mean duration of the post-treatment survival period was 5.1 and 9.3 months in groups B and A, respectively, that is, it was significantly longer in group A (P < 0.05). No significant intergroup difference in pain improvement was noted, and no significant post-treatment improvement in paralysis was achieved in either group. The post-treatment discharge-to-home eligibility rate did not differ significantly between the groups, but the Barthel Index improved significantly after treatment in group A (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION. After molecularly targeted drugs and BMA were introduced as treatments for lung cancer derived metastatic spine tumors, the survival periods of patients with such tumors increased, and their activity of daily living after treatment improved. Level of Evidence: 4 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-12-15 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5708716/ /pubmed/28816829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002382 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Outcomes
Uei, Hiroshi
Tokuhashi, Yasuaki
Maseda, Masafumi
Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients: Did the Treatments Improve Their Outcomes?
title Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients: Did the Treatments Improve Their Outcomes?
title_full Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients: Did the Treatments Improve Their Outcomes?
title_fullStr Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients: Did the Treatments Improve Their Outcomes?
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients: Did the Treatments Improve Their Outcomes?
title_short Treatment Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumor in Lung Cancer Patients: Did the Treatments Improve Their Outcomes?
title_sort treatment outcome of metastatic spine tumor in lung cancer patients: did the treatments improve their outcomes?
topic Outcomes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28816829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002382
work_keys_str_mv AT ueihiroshi treatmentoutcomeofmetastaticspinetumorinlungcancerpatientsdidthetreatmentsimprovetheiroutcomes
AT tokuhashiyasuaki treatmentoutcomeofmetastaticspinetumorinlungcancerpatientsdidthetreatmentsimprovetheiroutcomes
AT masedamasafumi treatmentoutcomeofmetastaticspinetumorinlungcancerpatientsdidthetreatmentsimprovetheiroutcomes