Cargando…

Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging

Invasive monitoring of pulsatile intracranial pressure can accurately predict shunt response in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, but may potentially cause complications such as bleeding and infection. We tested how a proposed surrogate parameter for pulsatile intracranial pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ringstad, Geir, Lindstrøm, Erika Kristina, Vatnehol, Svein Are Sirirud, Mardal, Kent-André, Emblem, Kyrre Eeg, Eide, Per Kristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188896
_version_ 1783282669565509632
author Ringstad, Geir
Lindstrøm, Erika Kristina
Vatnehol, Svein Are Sirirud
Mardal, Kent-André
Emblem, Kyrre Eeg
Eide, Per Kristian
author_facet Ringstad, Geir
Lindstrøm, Erika Kristina
Vatnehol, Svein Are Sirirud
Mardal, Kent-André
Emblem, Kyrre Eeg
Eide, Per Kristian
author_sort Ringstad, Geir
collection PubMed
description Invasive monitoring of pulsatile intracranial pressure can accurately predict shunt response in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, but may potentially cause complications such as bleeding and infection. We tested how a proposed surrogate parameter for pulsatile intracranial pressure, the phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging derived pulse pressure gradient, compared with its invasive counterpart. In 22 patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, preceding invasive intracranial pressure monitoring, and any surgical shunt procedure, we calculated the pulse pressure gradient from phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging derived cerebrospinal fluid flow velocities obtained at the upper cervical spinal canal using a simplified Navier-Stokes equation. Repeated measurements of the pulse pressure gradient were also undertaken in four healthy controls. Of 17 shunted patients, 16 responded, indicating high proportion of “true” normal pressure hydrocephalus in the patient cohort. However, there was no correlation between the magnetic resonance imaging derived pulse pressure gradient and pulsatile intracranial pressure (R = -.18, P = .43). Pulse pressure gradients were also similar in patients and healthy controls (P = .26), and did not differ between individuals with pulsatile intracranial pressure above or below established thresholds for shunt treatment (P = .97). Assessment of pulse pressure gradient at level C2 was therefore not found feasible to replace invasive monitoring of pulsatile intracranial pressure in selection of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus for surgical shunting. Unlike invasive, overnight monitoring, the pulse pressure gradient from magnetic resonance imaging comprises short-term pressure fluctuations only. Moreover, complexity of cervical cerebrospinal fluid flow and -pulsatility at the upper cervical spinal canal may render the pulse pressure gradient a poor surrogate marker for intracranial pressure pulsations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5708728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57087282017-12-15 Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging Ringstad, Geir Lindstrøm, Erika Kristina Vatnehol, Svein Are Sirirud Mardal, Kent-André Emblem, Kyrre Eeg Eide, Per Kristian PLoS One Research Article Invasive monitoring of pulsatile intracranial pressure can accurately predict shunt response in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, but may potentially cause complications such as bleeding and infection. We tested how a proposed surrogate parameter for pulsatile intracranial pressure, the phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging derived pulse pressure gradient, compared with its invasive counterpart. In 22 patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, preceding invasive intracranial pressure monitoring, and any surgical shunt procedure, we calculated the pulse pressure gradient from phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging derived cerebrospinal fluid flow velocities obtained at the upper cervical spinal canal using a simplified Navier-Stokes equation. Repeated measurements of the pulse pressure gradient were also undertaken in four healthy controls. Of 17 shunted patients, 16 responded, indicating high proportion of “true” normal pressure hydrocephalus in the patient cohort. However, there was no correlation between the magnetic resonance imaging derived pulse pressure gradient and pulsatile intracranial pressure (R = -.18, P = .43). Pulse pressure gradients were also similar in patients and healthy controls (P = .26), and did not differ between individuals with pulsatile intracranial pressure above or below established thresholds for shunt treatment (P = .97). Assessment of pulse pressure gradient at level C2 was therefore not found feasible to replace invasive monitoring of pulsatile intracranial pressure in selection of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus for surgical shunting. Unlike invasive, overnight monitoring, the pulse pressure gradient from magnetic resonance imaging comprises short-term pressure fluctuations only. Moreover, complexity of cervical cerebrospinal fluid flow and -pulsatility at the upper cervical spinal canal may render the pulse pressure gradient a poor surrogate marker for intracranial pressure pulsations. Public Library of Science 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5708728/ /pubmed/29190788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188896 Text en © 2017 Ringstad et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ringstad, Geir
Lindstrøm, Erika Kristina
Vatnehol, Svein Are Sirirud
Mardal, Kent-André
Emblem, Kyrre Eeg
Eide, Per Kristian
Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
title Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort non-invasive assessment of pulsatile intracranial pressure with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188896
work_keys_str_mv AT ringstadgeir noninvasiveassessmentofpulsatileintracranialpressurewithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lindstrømerikakristina noninvasiveassessmentofpulsatileintracranialpressurewithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT vatneholsveinaresirirud noninvasiveassessmentofpulsatileintracranialpressurewithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mardalkentandre noninvasiveassessmentofpulsatileintracranialpressurewithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT emblemkyrreeeg noninvasiveassessmentofpulsatileintracranialpressurewithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT eideperkristian noninvasiveassessmentofpulsatileintracranialpressurewithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging