Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens (placebo, pregabalin, GM-1 ganglioside, venlafaxine extended-release [venlafaxine XR], fampridine, conventional over-ground training [OT], body-weight-supported treadmill training [BWSTT], roboti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Da-Nian, Zhang, Xia-Qi, Ying, Jie, Chen, Zhong-Jun, Li, Li-Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008679
_version_ 1783282708146814976
author Ma, Da-Nian
Zhang, Xia-Qi
Ying, Jie
Chen, Zhong-Jun
Li, Li-Xin
author_facet Ma, Da-Nian
Zhang, Xia-Qi
Ying, Jie
Chen, Zhong-Jun
Li, Li-Xin
author_sort Ma, Da-Nian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens (placebo, pregabalin, GM-1 ganglioside, venlafaxine extended-release [venlafaxine XR], fampridine, conventional over-ground training [OT], body-weight-supported treadmill training [BWSTT], robotic-assisted gait training [RAGT] + OT and body-weight-supported over-ground training [BWSOT]) in treating spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Clinical controlled trials of 9 nonoperative regimens for SCI were retrieved in the electronic database. Traditional pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare the efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of SCI. Weighted mean difference (WMD), odds ratios (OR), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo engine Open BUGS (V.3.4.0) and R (V.3.2.1) package gemtc (V.0.6). RESULTS: A total of 9 clinical controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria were selected in this meta-analysis. On the aspect of efficacy, the results of pairwise meta-analysis indicated that the RAGT + OT and BWSOT might have the best efficacy in SCI patients in terms of a lower extremity motor score (LEMS) compared with conventional OT; the efficacy of RAGT + OT on SCI patients was relatively better than that of conventional OT in terms of walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI). With the aspect of safety, the constipation rate of placebo on SCI patients was relatively higher than that of venlafaxine XR; however, with respect to headache and urinary tract infection, there was no significant difference in the safety of placebo, pregabalin, GM-1 ganglioside, venlafaxine XR, and fampridine on SCI patients. The results of SUCRA values suggested that BWSOT had the highest SUCRA value (75.25%) of LEMS; RAGT + OT had the highest SUCRA value (88.50%) of WISCI; venlafaxine XR had the highest SUCRA value (94.00%) of constipation; venlafaxine XR had the highest SUCRA value (80.00%) of headache; GM-1 ganglioside had the highest SUCRA value (87.75%) of urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that the RAGT + OT and BWSOT might have the best efficacy in the treatment of SCI, and the venlafaxine XR and GM-1 ganglioside showed adequate safety for SCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5708945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57089452017-12-07 Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis Ma, Da-Nian Zhang, Xia-Qi Ying, Jie Chen, Zhong-Jun Li, Li-Xin Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 OBJECTIVE: This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens (placebo, pregabalin, GM-1 ganglioside, venlafaxine extended-release [venlafaxine XR], fampridine, conventional over-ground training [OT], body-weight-supported treadmill training [BWSTT], robotic-assisted gait training [RAGT] + OT and body-weight-supported over-ground training [BWSOT]) in treating spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Clinical controlled trials of 9 nonoperative regimens for SCI were retrieved in the electronic database. Traditional pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare the efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of SCI. Weighted mean difference (WMD), odds ratios (OR), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo engine Open BUGS (V.3.4.0) and R (V.3.2.1) package gemtc (V.0.6). RESULTS: A total of 9 clinical controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria were selected in this meta-analysis. On the aspect of efficacy, the results of pairwise meta-analysis indicated that the RAGT + OT and BWSOT might have the best efficacy in SCI patients in terms of a lower extremity motor score (LEMS) compared with conventional OT; the efficacy of RAGT + OT on SCI patients was relatively better than that of conventional OT in terms of walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI). With the aspect of safety, the constipation rate of placebo on SCI patients was relatively higher than that of venlafaxine XR; however, with respect to headache and urinary tract infection, there was no significant difference in the safety of placebo, pregabalin, GM-1 ganglioside, venlafaxine XR, and fampridine on SCI patients. The results of SUCRA values suggested that BWSOT had the highest SUCRA value (75.25%) of LEMS; RAGT + OT had the highest SUCRA value (88.50%) of WISCI; venlafaxine XR had the highest SUCRA value (94.00%) of constipation; venlafaxine XR had the highest SUCRA value (80.00%) of headache; GM-1 ganglioside had the highest SUCRA value (87.75%) of urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that the RAGT + OT and BWSOT might have the best efficacy in the treatment of SCI, and the venlafaxine XR and GM-1 ganglioside showed adequate safety for SCI. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5708945/ /pubmed/29381946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008679 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Ma, Da-Nian
Zhang, Xia-Qi
Ying, Jie
Chen, Zhong-Jun
Li, Li-Xin
Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: a network meta-analysis
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008679
work_keys_str_mv AT madanian efficacyandsafetyof9nonoperativeregimensforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangxiaqi efficacyandsafetyof9nonoperativeregimensforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yingjie efficacyandsafetyof9nonoperativeregimensforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryanetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenzhongjun efficacyandsafetyof9nonoperativeregimensforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryanetworkmetaanalysis
AT lilixin efficacyandsafetyof9nonoperativeregimensforthetreatmentofspinalcordinjuryanetworkmetaanalysis