Cargando…

Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol

BACKGROUND: Awareness of lung cancer screening remains low in the screening-eligible population, and when patients visit their clinician never having heard of lung cancer screening, engaging in shared decision making to arrive at an informed decision can be a challenge. Therefore, methods to effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter-Harris, Lisa, Comer, Robert Skipworth, Goyal, Anurag, Vode, Emilee Christine, Hanna, Nasser, Ceppa, DuyKhanh, Rawl, Susan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5709657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29146565
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8694
_version_ 1783282822384975872
author Carter-Harris, Lisa
Comer, Robert Skipworth
Goyal, Anurag
Vode, Emilee Christine
Hanna, Nasser
Ceppa, DuyKhanh
Rawl, Susan M
author_facet Carter-Harris, Lisa
Comer, Robert Skipworth
Goyal, Anurag
Vode, Emilee Christine
Hanna, Nasser
Ceppa, DuyKhanh
Rawl, Susan M
author_sort Carter-Harris, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Awareness of lung cancer screening remains low in the screening-eligible population, and when patients visit their clinician never having heard of lung cancer screening, engaging in shared decision making to arrive at an informed decision can be a challenge. Therefore, methods to effectively support both patients and clinicians to engage in these important discussions are essential. To facilitate shared decision making about lung cancer screening, effective methods to prepare patients to have these important discussions with their clinician are needed. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to develop a computer-tailored decision support tool that meets the certification criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument version 4.0 that will support shared decision making in lung cancer screening decisions. METHODS: Using a 3-phase process, we will develop and test a prototype of a computer-tailored decision support tool in a sample of lung cancer screening-eligible individuals. In phase I, we assembled a community advisory board comprising 10 screening-eligible individuals to develop the prototype. In phase II, we recruited a sample of 13 screening-eligible individuals to test the prototype for usability, acceptability, and satisfaction. In phase III, we are conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 60 screening-eligible participants who have never been screened for lung cancer. Outcomes tested include lung cancer and screening knowledge, lung cancer screening health beliefs (perceived risk, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy), perception of being prepared to engage in a patient-clinician discussion about lung cancer screening, occurrence of a patient-clinician discussion about lung cancer screening, and stage of adoption for lung cancer screening. RESULTS: Phases I and II are complete. Phase III is underway. As of July 15, 2017, 60 participants have been enrolled into the study, and have completed the baseline survey, intervention, and first follow-up survey. We expect to have results by December 31, 2017 and to have data analysis completed by March 1, 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Results from usability testing indicate that the computer-tailored decision support tool is easy to use, is helpful, and provides a satisfactory experience for the user. At the conclusion of phase III (pilot RCT), we will have preliminary effect sizes to inform a future fully powered RCT on changes in (1) knowledge about lung cancer and screening, (2) perceived risk of lung cancer, (3) perceived benefits of lung cancer screening, (4) perceived barriers to lung cancer screening, (5) self-efficacy for lung cancer screening, and (6) perceptions of being adequately prepared to engage in a discussion with their clinician about lung cancer screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5709657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57096572017-12-07 Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol Carter-Harris, Lisa Comer, Robert Skipworth Goyal, Anurag Vode, Emilee Christine Hanna, Nasser Ceppa, DuyKhanh Rawl, Susan M JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Awareness of lung cancer screening remains low in the screening-eligible population, and when patients visit their clinician never having heard of lung cancer screening, engaging in shared decision making to arrive at an informed decision can be a challenge. Therefore, methods to effectively support both patients and clinicians to engage in these important discussions are essential. To facilitate shared decision making about lung cancer screening, effective methods to prepare patients to have these important discussions with their clinician are needed. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to develop a computer-tailored decision support tool that meets the certification criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument version 4.0 that will support shared decision making in lung cancer screening decisions. METHODS: Using a 3-phase process, we will develop and test a prototype of a computer-tailored decision support tool in a sample of lung cancer screening-eligible individuals. In phase I, we assembled a community advisory board comprising 10 screening-eligible individuals to develop the prototype. In phase II, we recruited a sample of 13 screening-eligible individuals to test the prototype for usability, acceptability, and satisfaction. In phase III, we are conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 60 screening-eligible participants who have never been screened for lung cancer. Outcomes tested include lung cancer and screening knowledge, lung cancer screening health beliefs (perceived risk, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy), perception of being prepared to engage in a patient-clinician discussion about lung cancer screening, occurrence of a patient-clinician discussion about lung cancer screening, and stage of adoption for lung cancer screening. RESULTS: Phases I and II are complete. Phase III is underway. As of July 15, 2017, 60 participants have been enrolled into the study, and have completed the baseline survey, intervention, and first follow-up survey. We expect to have results by December 31, 2017 and to have data analysis completed by March 1, 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Results from usability testing indicate that the computer-tailored decision support tool is easy to use, is helpful, and provides a satisfactory experience for the user. At the conclusion of phase III (pilot RCT), we will have preliminary effect sizes to inform a future fully powered RCT on changes in (1) knowledge about lung cancer and screening, (2) perceived risk of lung cancer, (3) perceived benefits of lung cancer screening, (4) perceived barriers to lung cancer screening, (5) self-efficacy for lung cancer screening, and (6) perceptions of being adequately prepared to engage in a discussion with their clinician about lung cancer screening. JMIR Publications 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5709657/ /pubmed/29146565 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8694 Text en ©Lisa Carter-Harris, Robert Skipworth Comer, Anurag Goyal, Emilee Christine Vode, Nasser Hanna, DuyKhanh Ceppa, Susan M Rawl. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 16.11.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Carter-Harris, Lisa
Comer, Robert Skipworth
Goyal, Anurag
Vode, Emilee Christine
Hanna, Nasser
Ceppa, DuyKhanh
Rawl, Susan M
Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol
title Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol
title_full Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol
title_fullStr Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol
title_short Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol
title_sort development and usability testing of a computer-tailored decision support tool for lung cancer screening: study protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5709657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29146565
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8694
work_keys_str_mv AT carterharrislisa developmentandusabilitytestingofacomputertailoreddecisionsupporttoolforlungcancerscreeningstudyprotocol
AT comerrobertskipworth developmentandusabilitytestingofacomputertailoreddecisionsupporttoolforlungcancerscreeningstudyprotocol
AT goyalanurag developmentandusabilitytestingofacomputertailoreddecisionsupporttoolforlungcancerscreeningstudyprotocol
AT vodeemileechristine developmentandusabilitytestingofacomputertailoreddecisionsupporttoolforlungcancerscreeningstudyprotocol
AT hannanasser developmentandusabilitytestingofacomputertailoreddecisionsupporttoolforlungcancerscreeningstudyprotocol
AT ceppaduykhanh developmentandusabilitytestingofacomputertailoreddecisionsupporttoolforlungcancerscreeningstudyprotocol
AT rawlsusanm developmentandusabilitytestingofacomputertailoreddecisionsupporttoolforlungcancerscreeningstudyprotocol