Cargando…

Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND: The utility of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) derived adiposity measures as compared to anthropometric measures for the assessment of adiposity-related health risk is not clear. We aimed to clarify the relationships of BIA and anthropometric derived adipose measures with blood pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taing, Kevin Y., Farkouh, Michael E., Moineddin, Rahim, Tu, Jack V., Jha, Prabhat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5709937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29214029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-017-0173-1
_version_ 1783282877598793728
author Taing, Kevin Y.
Farkouh, Michael E.
Moineddin, Rahim
Tu, Jack V.
Jha, Prabhat
author_facet Taing, Kevin Y.
Farkouh, Michael E.
Moineddin, Rahim
Tu, Jack V.
Jha, Prabhat
author_sort Taing, Kevin Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The utility of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) derived adiposity measures as compared to anthropometric measures for the assessment of adiposity-related health risk is not clear. We aimed to clarify the relationships of BIA and anthropometric derived adipose measures with blood pressure and hypertension, and to compare the discriminative ability of the respective measures for hypertension. METHODS: We used baseline data collected between 2015 and 2016 from the Indian Study on Health of Adults (ISHA), an ongoing population based cohort study in India (N = 5990; age 30–69 years). We examined and compared the associations and discriminative ability between anthropometric (body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-height ratio) and BIA (whole body and trunk fat percentage) derived adiposity measures with blood pressure components (systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, mid-blood pressure) and hypertension. RESULTS: Regardless of whether the adiposity measure was derived from BIA or anthropometry, all were strongly and positively associated with blood pressure and hypertension. For both men and women, the magnitude of association of BIA measures with blood pressure and hypertension were comparable to those of anthropometric measures. Further, the ability of BIA derived adiposity measures to distinguish between those with and without hypertension was similar to the discriminative ability of anthropometric measures. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to simple anthropometric measures, BIA derived estimates of adiposity provide no apparent advantage in the assessment of blood pressure and hypertension. The observed similarities between adiposity measures suggest that simple anthropometrics may be sufficient to assess adiposity and adiposity-related risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5709937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57099372017-12-06 Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis Taing, Kevin Y. Farkouh, Michael E. Moineddin, Rahim Tu, Jack V. Jha, Prabhat BMC Obes Research Article BACKGROUND: The utility of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) derived adiposity measures as compared to anthropometric measures for the assessment of adiposity-related health risk is not clear. We aimed to clarify the relationships of BIA and anthropometric derived adipose measures with blood pressure and hypertension, and to compare the discriminative ability of the respective measures for hypertension. METHODS: We used baseline data collected between 2015 and 2016 from the Indian Study on Health of Adults (ISHA), an ongoing population based cohort study in India (N = 5990; age 30–69 years). We examined and compared the associations and discriminative ability between anthropometric (body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-height ratio) and BIA (whole body and trunk fat percentage) derived adiposity measures with blood pressure components (systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, mid-blood pressure) and hypertension. RESULTS: Regardless of whether the adiposity measure was derived from BIA or anthropometry, all were strongly and positively associated with blood pressure and hypertension. For both men and women, the magnitude of association of BIA measures with blood pressure and hypertension were comparable to those of anthropometric measures. Further, the ability of BIA derived adiposity measures to distinguish between those with and without hypertension was similar to the discriminative ability of anthropometric measures. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to simple anthropometric measures, BIA derived estimates of adiposity provide no apparent advantage in the assessment of blood pressure and hypertension. The observed similarities between adiposity measures suggest that simple anthropometrics may be sufficient to assess adiposity and adiposity-related risks. BioMed Central 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5709937/ /pubmed/29214029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-017-0173-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Taing, Kevin Y.
Farkouh, Michael E.
Moineddin, Rahim
Tu, Jack V.
Jha, Prabhat
Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis
title Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis
title_full Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis
title_fullStr Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis
title_short Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis
title_sort comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in india: a cross-sectional analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5709937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29214029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40608-017-0173-1
work_keys_str_mv AT taingkeviny comparativeassociationsbetweenanthropometricandbioelectricimpedanceanalysisderivedadipositymeasureswithbloodpressureandhypertensioninindiaacrosssectionalanalysis
AT farkouhmichaele comparativeassociationsbetweenanthropometricandbioelectricimpedanceanalysisderivedadipositymeasureswithbloodpressureandhypertensioninindiaacrosssectionalanalysis
AT moineddinrahim comparativeassociationsbetweenanthropometricandbioelectricimpedanceanalysisderivedadipositymeasureswithbloodpressureandhypertensioninindiaacrosssectionalanalysis
AT tujackv comparativeassociationsbetweenanthropometricandbioelectricimpedanceanalysisderivedadipositymeasureswithbloodpressureandhypertensioninindiaacrosssectionalanalysis
AT jhaprabhat comparativeassociationsbetweenanthropometricandbioelectricimpedanceanalysisderivedadipositymeasureswithbloodpressureandhypertensioninindiaacrosssectionalanalysis