Cargando…

Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions

The rapid rise of particle therapy across the world necessitates evidence to justify its ever-increasing utilization. This narrative review summarizes the current status of these technologies on treatment of both meningiomas and gliomas, the most common benign and malignant primary brain tumors, res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adeberg, Sebastian, Harrabi, Semi B., Verma, Vivek, Bernhardt, Denise, Grau, Nicole, Debus, Jürgen, Rieken, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29195506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0924-7
_version_ 1783282907693973504
author Adeberg, Sebastian
Harrabi, Semi B.
Verma, Vivek
Bernhardt, Denise
Grau, Nicole
Debus, Jürgen
Rieken, Stefan
author_facet Adeberg, Sebastian
Harrabi, Semi B.
Verma, Vivek
Bernhardt, Denise
Grau, Nicole
Debus, Jürgen
Rieken, Stefan
author_sort Adeberg, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description The rapid rise of particle therapy across the world necessitates evidence to justify its ever-increasing utilization. This narrative review summarizes the current status of these technologies on treatment of both meningiomas and gliomas, the most common benign and malignant primary brain tumors, respectively. Proton beam therapy (PBT) for meningiomas displays high rates of long-term local control, low rates of symptomatic deterioration, along with the potential for safe dose-escalation in select (but not necessarily routine) cases. PBT is also associated with low adverse events and maintenance of functional outcomes, which have implications for quality of life and cost-effectiveness measures going forward. Data on carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) are limited; existing series describe virtually no high-grade toxicities and high local control. Regarding the few available data on low-grade gliomas, PBT provides opportunities to dose-escalate while affording no increase of severe toxicities, along with maintaining appropriate quality of life. Although dose-escalation for low-grade disease has been less frequently performed than for glioblastoma, PBT and CIRT continue to be utilized for the latter, and also have potential for safer re-irradiation of high-grade gliomas. For both neoplasms, the impact of superior dosimetric profiles with endpoints such as neurocognitive decline and neurologic funcionality, are also discussed to the extent of requiring more data to support the utility of particle therapy. Caveats to these data are also described, such as the largely retrospective nature of the available studies, patient selection, and heterogeneity in patient population as well as treatment (including mixed photon/particle treatment). Nevertheless, multiple prospective trials (which may partially attenuate those concerns) are also discussed. In light of the low quantity and quality of available data, major questions remain regarding economic concerns as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5710063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57100632017-12-06 Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions Adeberg, Sebastian Harrabi, Semi B. Verma, Vivek Bernhardt, Denise Grau, Nicole Debus, Jürgen Rieken, Stefan Radiat Oncol Review The rapid rise of particle therapy across the world necessitates evidence to justify its ever-increasing utilization. This narrative review summarizes the current status of these technologies on treatment of both meningiomas and gliomas, the most common benign and malignant primary brain tumors, respectively. Proton beam therapy (PBT) for meningiomas displays high rates of long-term local control, low rates of symptomatic deterioration, along with the potential for safe dose-escalation in select (but not necessarily routine) cases. PBT is also associated with low adverse events and maintenance of functional outcomes, which have implications for quality of life and cost-effectiveness measures going forward. Data on carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) are limited; existing series describe virtually no high-grade toxicities and high local control. Regarding the few available data on low-grade gliomas, PBT provides opportunities to dose-escalate while affording no increase of severe toxicities, along with maintaining appropriate quality of life. Although dose-escalation for low-grade disease has been less frequently performed than for glioblastoma, PBT and CIRT continue to be utilized for the latter, and also have potential for safer re-irradiation of high-grade gliomas. For both neoplasms, the impact of superior dosimetric profiles with endpoints such as neurocognitive decline and neurologic funcionality, are also discussed to the extent of requiring more data to support the utility of particle therapy. Caveats to these data are also described, such as the largely retrospective nature of the available studies, patient selection, and heterogeneity in patient population as well as treatment (including mixed photon/particle treatment). Nevertheless, multiple prospective trials (which may partially attenuate those concerns) are also discussed. In light of the low quantity and quality of available data, major questions remain regarding economic concerns as well. BioMed Central 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5710063/ /pubmed/29195506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0924-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Adeberg, Sebastian
Harrabi, Semi B.
Verma, Vivek
Bernhardt, Denise
Grau, Nicole
Debus, Jürgen
Rieken, Stefan
Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions
title Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions
title_full Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions
title_fullStr Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions
title_short Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions
title_sort treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29195506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0924-7
work_keys_str_mv AT adebergsebastian treatmentofmeningiomaandgliomawithprotonsandcarbonions
AT harrabisemib treatmentofmeningiomaandgliomawithprotonsandcarbonions
AT vermavivek treatmentofmeningiomaandgliomawithprotonsandcarbonions
AT bernhardtdenise treatmentofmeningiomaandgliomawithprotonsandcarbonions
AT graunicole treatmentofmeningiomaandgliomawithprotonsandcarbonions
AT debusjurgen treatmentofmeningiomaandgliomawithprotonsandcarbonions
AT riekenstefan treatmentofmeningiomaandgliomawithprotonsandcarbonions