Cargando…
Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study
BACKGROUND: Fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity (GT) are a frequent injury progressively treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Yet, no biomechanical study has been performed comparing fixation strength of arthroscopic single- (SR) vs. double row (DR) fixation. METHODS: Standardized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29191201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1868-7 |
_version_ | 1783282907949826048 |
---|---|
author | Seppel, Gernot Saier, Tim Martetschläger, Frank Plath, Johannes E. Guevara-Alvarez, Alberto Henschel, Julia Winkler, Martin Augat, Peter Imhoff, Andreas B. Buchmann, Stefan |
author_facet | Seppel, Gernot Saier, Tim Martetschläger, Frank Plath, Johannes E. Guevara-Alvarez, Alberto Henschel, Julia Winkler, Martin Augat, Peter Imhoff, Andreas B. Buchmann, Stefan |
author_sort | Seppel, Gernot |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity (GT) are a frequent injury progressively treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Yet, no biomechanical study has been performed comparing fixation strength of arthroscopic single- (SR) vs. double row (DR) fixation. METHODS: Standardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created in 12 fresh frozen proximal humeri. After random assignation to the SR or DR group the fixed humeri were tested applying cyclic loading to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Load to failure and fragment displacement were assessed by means of an electrodynamic material testing machine using an optical tracking system. RESULTS: Load to failure values were higher in the DR group (649 N; ±176) than in the SR group (490 N; ±145) however without statistical significance (p = .12). In greater tuberosity displacement of 3–5 mm surgical treatment is recommended. The fixing constructs in this study did not reach displacement landmarks of 3 or 5 mm before construct failure as shown in previous studies. Thus the applied traction force (N) at 1 mm displacement was analyzed. In the SR group the load at 1 mm displacement was 277 N; ±46 compared to 260 N; ±62 in the DR group (p = .65). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that both techniques are viable options for refixation of greater tuberosity fractures. Level of Evidence: Laboratory study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5710064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57100642017-12-06 Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study Seppel, Gernot Saier, Tim Martetschläger, Frank Plath, Johannes E. Guevara-Alvarez, Alberto Henschel, Julia Winkler, Martin Augat, Peter Imhoff, Andreas B. Buchmann, Stefan BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity (GT) are a frequent injury progressively treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Yet, no biomechanical study has been performed comparing fixation strength of arthroscopic single- (SR) vs. double row (DR) fixation. METHODS: Standardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created in 12 fresh frozen proximal humeri. After random assignation to the SR or DR group the fixed humeri were tested applying cyclic loading to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Load to failure and fragment displacement were assessed by means of an electrodynamic material testing machine using an optical tracking system. RESULTS: Load to failure values were higher in the DR group (649 N; ±176) than in the SR group (490 N; ±145) however without statistical significance (p = .12). In greater tuberosity displacement of 3–5 mm surgical treatment is recommended. The fixing constructs in this study did not reach displacement landmarks of 3 or 5 mm before construct failure as shown in previous studies. Thus the applied traction force (N) at 1 mm displacement was analyzed. In the SR group the load at 1 mm displacement was 277 N; ±46 compared to 260 N; ±62 in the DR group (p = .65). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that both techniques are viable options for refixation of greater tuberosity fractures. Level of Evidence: Laboratory study. BioMed Central 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5710064/ /pubmed/29191201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1868-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Seppel, Gernot Saier, Tim Martetschläger, Frank Plath, Johannes E. Guevara-Alvarez, Alberto Henschel, Julia Winkler, Martin Augat, Peter Imhoff, Andreas B. Buchmann, Stefan Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study |
title | Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study |
title_full | Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study |
title_fullStr | Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study |
title_short | Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study |
title_sort | single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29191201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1868-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seppelgernot singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT saiertim singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT martetschlagerfrank singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT plathjohannese singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT guevaraalvarezalberto singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT henscheljulia singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT winklermartin singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT augatpeter singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT imhoffandreasb singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT buchmannstefan singleversusdoublerowsutureanchorfixationforgreatertuberosityfracturesabiomechanicalstudy |