Cargando…

Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells

Radiation-induced bone loss is a potential health concern for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Enhanced bone resorption by osteoclasts and decreased bone formation by osteoblasts were thought to be the main reasons. In this study, we showed that both pre-differentiating and differentiating o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jian, Wang, Ziyang, Wu, Anqing, Nie, Jing, Pei, Hailong, Hu, Wentao, Wang, Bing, Shang, Peng, Li, Bingyan, Zhou, Guangming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28541506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx026
_version_ 1783282944354287616
author Zhang, Jian
Wang, Ziyang
Wu, Anqing
Nie, Jing
Pei, Hailong
Hu, Wentao
Wang, Bing
Shang, Peng
Li, Bingyan
Zhou, Guangming
author_facet Zhang, Jian
Wang, Ziyang
Wu, Anqing
Nie, Jing
Pei, Hailong
Hu, Wentao
Wang, Bing
Shang, Peng
Li, Bingyan
Zhou, Guangming
author_sort Zhang, Jian
collection PubMed
description Radiation-induced bone loss is a potential health concern for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Enhanced bone resorption by osteoclasts and decreased bone formation by osteoblasts were thought to be the main reasons. In this study, we showed that both pre-differentiating and differentiating osteoclasts were relatively sensitive to X-rays compared with osteoblasts. X-rays decreased cell viability to a greater degree in RAW264.7 cells and in differentiating cells than than in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. X-rays at up to 8 Gy had little effects on osteoblast mineralization. In contrast, X-rays at 1 Gy induced enhanced osteoclastogenesis by enhanced cell fusion, but had no effects on bone resorption. A higher dose of X-rays at 8 Gy, however, had an inhibitory effect on bone resorption. In addition, actin ring formation was disrupted by 8 Gy of X-rays and reorganized into clusters. An increased activity of Caspase 3 was found after X-ray exposure. Actin disorganization and increased apoptosis may be the potential effects of X-rays at high doses, by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation. Taken together, our data indicate high radiosensitivity of osteoclasts. X-ray irradiation at relatively low doses can activate osteoclastogenesis, but not osteogenic differentiation. The radiosensitive osteoclasts are the potentially responsive cells for X-ray-induced bone loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5710662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57106622017-12-07 Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells Zhang, Jian Wang, Ziyang Wu, Anqing Nie, Jing Pei, Hailong Hu, Wentao Wang, Bing Shang, Peng Li, Bingyan Zhou, Guangming J Radiat Res Biology Radiation-induced bone loss is a potential health concern for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Enhanced bone resorption by osteoclasts and decreased bone formation by osteoblasts were thought to be the main reasons. In this study, we showed that both pre-differentiating and differentiating osteoclasts were relatively sensitive to X-rays compared with osteoblasts. X-rays decreased cell viability to a greater degree in RAW264.7 cells and in differentiating cells than than in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. X-rays at up to 8 Gy had little effects on osteoblast mineralization. In contrast, X-rays at 1 Gy induced enhanced osteoclastogenesis by enhanced cell fusion, but had no effects on bone resorption. A higher dose of X-rays at 8 Gy, however, had an inhibitory effect on bone resorption. In addition, actin ring formation was disrupted by 8 Gy of X-rays and reorganized into clusters. An increased activity of Caspase 3 was found after X-ray exposure. Actin disorganization and increased apoptosis may be the potential effects of X-rays at high doses, by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation. Taken together, our data indicate high radiosensitivity of osteoclasts. X-ray irradiation at relatively low doses can activate osteoclastogenesis, but not osteogenic differentiation. The radiosensitive osteoclasts are the potentially responsive cells for X-ray-induced bone loss. Oxford University Press 2017-11 2017-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5710662/ /pubmed/28541506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx026 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Biology
Zhang, Jian
Wang, Ziyang
Wu, Anqing
Nie, Jing
Pei, Hailong
Hu, Wentao
Wang, Bing
Shang, Peng
Li, Bingyan
Zhou, Guangming
Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells
title Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells
title_full Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells
title_fullStr Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells
title_full_unstemmed Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells
title_short Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells
title_sort differences in responses to x-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells
topic Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28541506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx026
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjian differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT wangziyang differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT wuanqing differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT niejing differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT peihailong differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT huwentao differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT wangbing differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT shangpeng differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT libingyan differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells
AT zhouguangming differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells