Cargando…
Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells
Radiation-induced bone loss is a potential health concern for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Enhanced bone resorption by osteoclasts and decreased bone formation by osteoblasts were thought to be the main reasons. In this study, we showed that both pre-differentiating and differentiating o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28541506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx026 |
_version_ | 1783282944354287616 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jian Wang, Ziyang Wu, Anqing Nie, Jing Pei, Hailong Hu, Wentao Wang, Bing Shang, Peng Li, Bingyan Zhou, Guangming |
author_facet | Zhang, Jian Wang, Ziyang Wu, Anqing Nie, Jing Pei, Hailong Hu, Wentao Wang, Bing Shang, Peng Li, Bingyan Zhou, Guangming |
author_sort | Zhang, Jian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiation-induced bone loss is a potential health concern for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Enhanced bone resorption by osteoclasts and decreased bone formation by osteoblasts were thought to be the main reasons. In this study, we showed that both pre-differentiating and differentiating osteoclasts were relatively sensitive to X-rays compared with osteoblasts. X-rays decreased cell viability to a greater degree in RAW264.7 cells and in differentiating cells than than in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. X-rays at up to 8 Gy had little effects on osteoblast mineralization. In contrast, X-rays at 1 Gy induced enhanced osteoclastogenesis by enhanced cell fusion, but had no effects on bone resorption. A higher dose of X-rays at 8 Gy, however, had an inhibitory effect on bone resorption. In addition, actin ring formation was disrupted by 8 Gy of X-rays and reorganized into clusters. An increased activity of Caspase 3 was found after X-ray exposure. Actin disorganization and increased apoptosis may be the potential effects of X-rays at high doses, by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation. Taken together, our data indicate high radiosensitivity of osteoclasts. X-ray irradiation at relatively low doses can activate osteoclastogenesis, but not osteogenic differentiation. The radiosensitive osteoclasts are the potentially responsive cells for X-ray-induced bone loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5710662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57106622017-12-07 Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells Zhang, Jian Wang, Ziyang Wu, Anqing Nie, Jing Pei, Hailong Hu, Wentao Wang, Bing Shang, Peng Li, Bingyan Zhou, Guangming J Radiat Res Biology Radiation-induced bone loss is a potential health concern for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Enhanced bone resorption by osteoclasts and decreased bone formation by osteoblasts were thought to be the main reasons. In this study, we showed that both pre-differentiating and differentiating osteoclasts were relatively sensitive to X-rays compared with osteoblasts. X-rays decreased cell viability to a greater degree in RAW264.7 cells and in differentiating cells than than in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. X-rays at up to 8 Gy had little effects on osteoblast mineralization. In contrast, X-rays at 1 Gy induced enhanced osteoclastogenesis by enhanced cell fusion, but had no effects on bone resorption. A higher dose of X-rays at 8 Gy, however, had an inhibitory effect on bone resorption. In addition, actin ring formation was disrupted by 8 Gy of X-rays and reorganized into clusters. An increased activity of Caspase 3 was found after X-ray exposure. Actin disorganization and increased apoptosis may be the potential effects of X-rays at high doses, by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation. Taken together, our data indicate high radiosensitivity of osteoclasts. X-ray irradiation at relatively low doses can activate osteoclastogenesis, but not osteogenic differentiation. The radiosensitive osteoclasts are the potentially responsive cells for X-ray-induced bone loss. Oxford University Press 2017-11 2017-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5710662/ /pubmed/28541506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx026 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Biology Zhang, Jian Wang, Ziyang Wu, Anqing Nie, Jing Pei, Hailong Hu, Wentao Wang, Bing Shang, Peng Li, Bingyan Zhou, Guangming Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells |
title | Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells |
title_full | Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells |
title_fullStr | Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells |
title_short | Differences in responses to X-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells |
title_sort | differences in responses to x-ray exposure between osteoclast and osteoblast cells |
topic | Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28541506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjian differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT wangziyang differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT wuanqing differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT niejing differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT peihailong differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT huwentao differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT wangbing differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT shangpeng differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT libingyan differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells AT zhouguangming differencesinresponsestoxrayexposurebetweenosteoclastandosteoblastcells |