Cargando…

Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study

RATIONALE: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is mainly caused by previous exposure to asbestos fibers and has a poor prognosis. Due to a long latency period between exposure and diagnosis, MPM incidence is expected to peak between 2020-2025. Screening of asbestos-exposed individuals is believed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamote, Kevin, Brinkman, Paul, Vandermeersch, Lore, Vynck, Matthijs, Sterk, Peter J., Van Langenhove, Herman, Thas, Olivier, Van Cleemput, Joris, Nackaerts, Kristiaan, van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207669
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21335
_version_ 1783282976718585856
author Lamote, Kevin
Brinkman, Paul
Vandermeersch, Lore
Vynck, Matthijs
Sterk, Peter J.
Van Langenhove, Herman
Thas, Olivier
Van Cleemput, Joris
Nackaerts, Kristiaan
van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
author_facet Lamote, Kevin
Brinkman, Paul
Vandermeersch, Lore
Vynck, Matthijs
Sterk, Peter J.
Van Langenhove, Herman
Thas, Olivier
Van Cleemput, Joris
Nackaerts, Kristiaan
van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
author_sort Lamote, Kevin
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is mainly caused by previous exposure to asbestos fibers and has a poor prognosis. Due to a long latency period between exposure and diagnosis, MPM incidence is expected to peak between 2020-2025. Screening of asbestos-exposed individuals is believed to improve early detection and hence, MPM management. Recent developments focus on breath analysis for screening since breath contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which reflect the cell’s metabolism. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this cross-sectional, case-control study is to identify VOCs in exhaled breath of MPM patients with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and to assess breath analysis to screen for MPM using an electronic nose (eNose). METHODS: Breath and background samples were taken from 64 subjects: 16 healthy controls (HC), 19 asymptomatic former asbestos-exposed (AEx) individuals, 15 patients with benign asbestos-related diseases (ARD) and 14 MPM patients. Samples were analyzed with both GC-MS and eNose. RESULTS: Using GC-MS, AEx individuals were discriminated from MPM patients with 97% accuracy, with diethyl ether, limonene, nonanal, methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane as important VOCs. This was validated by eNose analysis. MPM patients were discriminated from AEx+ARD participants by GC-MS and eNose with 94% and 74% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 91%, 82%, 100% for GC-MS and 82%, 55%, 82%, 55% for eNose, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows accurate discrimination of patients with MPM from asymptomatic asbestos-exposed persons at risk by GC-MS and eNose analysis of exhaled VOCs and provides proof-of-principle of breath analysis for MPM screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5710949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57109492017-12-04 Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study Lamote, Kevin Brinkman, Paul Vandermeersch, Lore Vynck, Matthijs Sterk, Peter J. Van Langenhove, Herman Thas, Olivier Van Cleemput, Joris Nackaerts, Kristiaan van Meerbeeck, Jan P. Oncotarget Research Paper RATIONALE: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is mainly caused by previous exposure to asbestos fibers and has a poor prognosis. Due to a long latency period between exposure and diagnosis, MPM incidence is expected to peak between 2020-2025. Screening of asbestos-exposed individuals is believed to improve early detection and hence, MPM management. Recent developments focus on breath analysis for screening since breath contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which reflect the cell’s metabolism. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this cross-sectional, case-control study is to identify VOCs in exhaled breath of MPM patients with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and to assess breath analysis to screen for MPM using an electronic nose (eNose). METHODS: Breath and background samples were taken from 64 subjects: 16 healthy controls (HC), 19 asymptomatic former asbestos-exposed (AEx) individuals, 15 patients with benign asbestos-related diseases (ARD) and 14 MPM patients. Samples were analyzed with both GC-MS and eNose. RESULTS: Using GC-MS, AEx individuals were discriminated from MPM patients with 97% accuracy, with diethyl ether, limonene, nonanal, methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane as important VOCs. This was validated by eNose analysis. MPM patients were discriminated from AEx+ARD participants by GC-MS and eNose with 94% and 74% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 91%, 82%, 100% for GC-MS and 82%, 55%, 82%, 55% for eNose, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows accurate discrimination of patients with MPM from asymptomatic asbestos-exposed persons at risk by GC-MS and eNose analysis of exhaled VOCs and provides proof-of-principle of breath analysis for MPM screening. Impact Journals LLC 2017-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5710949/ /pubmed/29207669 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21335 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Lamote et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Lamote, Kevin
Brinkman, Paul
Vandermeersch, Lore
Vynck, Matthijs
Sterk, Peter J.
Van Langenhove, Herman
Thas, Olivier
Van Cleemput, Joris
Nackaerts, Kristiaan
van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study
title Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study
title_full Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study
title_fullStr Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study
title_short Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study
title_sort breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207669
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21335
work_keys_str_mv AT lamotekevin breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT brinkmanpaul breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT vandermeerschlore breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT vynckmatthijs breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT sterkpeterj breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT vanlangenhoveherman breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT thasolivier breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT vancleemputjoris breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT nackaertskristiaan breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy
AT vanmeerbeeckjanp breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy