Cargando…
Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study
RATIONALE: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is mainly caused by previous exposure to asbestos fibers and has a poor prognosis. Due to a long latency period between exposure and diagnosis, MPM incidence is expected to peak between 2020-2025. Screening of asbestos-exposed individuals is believed t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207669 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21335 |
_version_ | 1783282976718585856 |
---|---|
author | Lamote, Kevin Brinkman, Paul Vandermeersch, Lore Vynck, Matthijs Sterk, Peter J. Van Langenhove, Herman Thas, Olivier Van Cleemput, Joris Nackaerts, Kristiaan van Meerbeeck, Jan P. |
author_facet | Lamote, Kevin Brinkman, Paul Vandermeersch, Lore Vynck, Matthijs Sterk, Peter J. Van Langenhove, Herman Thas, Olivier Van Cleemput, Joris Nackaerts, Kristiaan van Meerbeeck, Jan P. |
author_sort | Lamote, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is mainly caused by previous exposure to asbestos fibers and has a poor prognosis. Due to a long latency period between exposure and diagnosis, MPM incidence is expected to peak between 2020-2025. Screening of asbestos-exposed individuals is believed to improve early detection and hence, MPM management. Recent developments focus on breath analysis for screening since breath contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which reflect the cell’s metabolism. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this cross-sectional, case-control study is to identify VOCs in exhaled breath of MPM patients with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and to assess breath analysis to screen for MPM using an electronic nose (eNose). METHODS: Breath and background samples were taken from 64 subjects: 16 healthy controls (HC), 19 asymptomatic former asbestos-exposed (AEx) individuals, 15 patients with benign asbestos-related diseases (ARD) and 14 MPM patients. Samples were analyzed with both GC-MS and eNose. RESULTS: Using GC-MS, AEx individuals were discriminated from MPM patients with 97% accuracy, with diethyl ether, limonene, nonanal, methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane as important VOCs. This was validated by eNose analysis. MPM patients were discriminated from AEx+ARD participants by GC-MS and eNose with 94% and 74% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 91%, 82%, 100% for GC-MS and 82%, 55%, 82%, 55% for eNose, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows accurate discrimination of patients with MPM from asymptomatic asbestos-exposed persons at risk by GC-MS and eNose analysis of exhaled VOCs and provides proof-of-principle of breath analysis for MPM screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5710949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57109492017-12-04 Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study Lamote, Kevin Brinkman, Paul Vandermeersch, Lore Vynck, Matthijs Sterk, Peter J. Van Langenhove, Herman Thas, Olivier Van Cleemput, Joris Nackaerts, Kristiaan van Meerbeeck, Jan P. Oncotarget Research Paper RATIONALE: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is mainly caused by previous exposure to asbestos fibers and has a poor prognosis. Due to a long latency period between exposure and diagnosis, MPM incidence is expected to peak between 2020-2025. Screening of asbestos-exposed individuals is believed to improve early detection and hence, MPM management. Recent developments focus on breath analysis for screening since breath contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which reflect the cell’s metabolism. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this cross-sectional, case-control study is to identify VOCs in exhaled breath of MPM patients with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and to assess breath analysis to screen for MPM using an electronic nose (eNose). METHODS: Breath and background samples were taken from 64 subjects: 16 healthy controls (HC), 19 asymptomatic former asbestos-exposed (AEx) individuals, 15 patients with benign asbestos-related diseases (ARD) and 14 MPM patients. Samples were analyzed with both GC-MS and eNose. RESULTS: Using GC-MS, AEx individuals were discriminated from MPM patients with 97% accuracy, with diethyl ether, limonene, nonanal, methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane as important VOCs. This was validated by eNose analysis. MPM patients were discriminated from AEx+ARD participants by GC-MS and eNose with 94% and 74% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 91%, 82%, 100% for GC-MS and 82%, 55%, 82%, 55% for eNose, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows accurate discrimination of patients with MPM from asymptomatic asbestos-exposed persons at risk by GC-MS and eNose analysis of exhaled VOCs and provides proof-of-principle of breath analysis for MPM screening. Impact Journals LLC 2017-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5710949/ /pubmed/29207669 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21335 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Lamote et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Lamote, Kevin Brinkman, Paul Vandermeersch, Lore Vynck, Matthijs Sterk, Peter J. Van Langenhove, Herman Thas, Olivier Van Cleemput, Joris Nackaerts, Kristiaan van Meerbeeck, Jan P. Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study |
title | Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study |
title_full | Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study |
title_fullStr | Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study |
title_short | Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study |
title_sort | breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207669 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamotekevin breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT brinkmanpaul breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT vandermeerschlore breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT vynckmatthijs breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT sterkpeterj breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT vanlangenhoveherman breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT thasolivier breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT vancleemputjoris breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT nackaertskristiaan breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy AT vanmeerbeeckjanp breathanalysisbygaschromatographymassspectrometryandelectronicnosetoscreenforpleuralmesotheliomaacrosssectionalcasecontrolstudy |