Cargando…

Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the IsoCal geometric calibration system for kilovoltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) imagers on Varian C‐series linear accelerators (linacs). IsoCal calibration starts by imaging a phantom and collimator plate using MV images...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Song, Du, Weiliang, Balter, Peter, Munro, Peter, Jeung, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4688
_version_ 1783282995061325824
author Gao, Song
Du, Weiliang
Balter, Peter
Munro, Peter
Jeung, Andrew
author_facet Gao, Song
Du, Weiliang
Balter, Peter
Munro, Peter
Jeung, Andrew
author_sort Gao, Song
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the IsoCal geometric calibration system for kilovoltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) imagers on Varian C‐series linear accelerators (linacs). IsoCal calibration starts by imaging a phantom and collimator plate using MV images with different collimator angles, as well as MV and kV images at different gantry angles. The software then identifies objects on the collimator plate and in the phantom to determine the location of the treatment isocenter and its relation to the MV and kV imager centers. It calculates offsets between the positions of the imaging panels and the treatment isocenter as a function of gantry angle and writes a correction file that can be applied to MV and kV systems to correct for those offsets in the position of the panels. We performed IsoCal calibration three times on each of five Varian C‐series linacs, each time with an independent setup. We then compared the IsoCal calibrations with a simplified Winston‐Lutz (WL)‐based system and with a Varian cubic phantom (VC)‐based system. The maximum IsoCal corrections ranged from 0.7 mm to 1.5 mm for MV and 0.9 mm to 1.8 mm for kV imagers across the five linacs. The variations in the three calibrations for each linac were less than 0.2 mm. Without IsoCal correction, the WL results showed discrepancies between the treatment isocenter and the imager center of 0.9 mm to 1.6 mm (for the MV imager) and 0.5 mm to 1.1 mm (for the kV imager); with IsoCal corrections applied, the differences were reduced to 0.2 mm to 0.6 mm (MV) and 0.3 mm to 0.6 mm (kV) across the five linacs. The VC system was not as precise as the WL system, but showed similar results, with discrepancies of less than 1.0 mm when the IsoCal corrections were applied. We conclude that IsoCal is an accurate and consistent method for calibration and periodic quality assurance of MV and kV imaging systems. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57110402018-04-02 Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems Gao, Song Du, Weiliang Balter, Peter Munro, Peter Jeung, Andrew J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the IsoCal geometric calibration system for kilovoltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) imagers on Varian C‐series linear accelerators (linacs). IsoCal calibration starts by imaging a phantom and collimator plate using MV images with different collimator angles, as well as MV and kV images at different gantry angles. The software then identifies objects on the collimator plate and in the phantom to determine the location of the treatment isocenter and its relation to the MV and kV imager centers. It calculates offsets between the positions of the imaging panels and the treatment isocenter as a function of gantry angle and writes a correction file that can be applied to MV and kV systems to correct for those offsets in the position of the panels. We performed IsoCal calibration three times on each of five Varian C‐series linacs, each time with an independent setup. We then compared the IsoCal calibrations with a simplified Winston‐Lutz (WL)‐based system and with a Varian cubic phantom (VC)‐based system. The maximum IsoCal corrections ranged from 0.7 mm to 1.5 mm for MV and 0.9 mm to 1.8 mm for kV imagers across the five linacs. The variations in the three calibrations for each linac were less than 0.2 mm. Without IsoCal correction, the WL results showed discrepancies between the treatment isocenter and the imager center of 0.9 mm to 1.6 mm (for the MV imager) and 0.5 mm to 1.1 mm (for the kV imager); with IsoCal corrections applied, the differences were reduced to 0.2 mm to 0.6 mm (MV) and 0.3 mm to 0.6 mm (kV) across the five linacs. The VC system was not as precise as the WL system, but showed similar results, with discrepancies of less than 1.0 mm when the IsoCal corrections were applied. We conclude that IsoCal is an accurate and consistent method for calibration and periodic quality assurance of MV and kV imaging systems. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711040/ /pubmed/24892342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4688 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Gao, Song
Du, Weiliang
Balter, Peter
Munro, Peter
Jeung, Andrew
Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems
title Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems
title_full Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems
title_short Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems
title_sort evaluation of isocal geometric calibration system for varian linacs equipped with on‐board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4688
work_keys_str_mv AT gaosong evaluationofisocalgeometriccalibrationsystemforvarianlinacsequippedwithonboardimagerandelectronicportalimagingdeviceimagingsystems
AT duweiliang evaluationofisocalgeometriccalibrationsystemforvarianlinacsequippedwithonboardimagerandelectronicportalimagingdeviceimagingsystems
AT balterpeter evaluationofisocalgeometriccalibrationsystemforvarianlinacsequippedwithonboardimagerandelectronicportalimagingdeviceimagingsystems
AT munropeter evaluationofisocalgeometriccalibrationsystemforvarianlinacsequippedwithonboardimagerandelectronicportalimagingdeviceimagingsystems
AT jeungandrew evaluationofisocalgeometriccalibrationsystemforvarianlinacsequippedwithonboardimagerandelectronicportalimagingdeviceimagingsystems