Cargando…

Optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers

Pulsed low‐dose‐rate radiotherapy (PLDR) has been proven to be a valid method of reirradiation. Previous studies of recurrent cancer radiotherapy were mainly based on conventional 3D CRT and VMAT delivery techniques. There are difficulties in IMRT planning using existing commercial treatment plannin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Shengwei, Lang, Jinyi, Wang, Pei, Li, Jie, Lin, Muhan, Chen, Xiaoming, Guo, Ming, Chen, Fu, Chen, Lili, Ma, Chang Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4661
_version_ 1783282997614608384
author Kang, Shengwei
Lang, Jinyi
Wang, Pei
Li, Jie
Lin, Muhan
Chen, Xiaoming
Guo, Ming
Chen, Fu
Chen, Lili
Ma, Chang Ming
author_facet Kang, Shengwei
Lang, Jinyi
Wang, Pei
Li, Jie
Lin, Muhan
Chen, Xiaoming
Guo, Ming
Chen, Fu
Chen, Lili
Ma, Chang Ming
author_sort Kang, Shengwei
collection PubMed
description Pulsed low‐dose‐rate radiotherapy (PLDR) has been proven to be a valid method of reirradiation. Previous studies of recurrent cancer radiotherapy were mainly based on conventional 3D CRT and VMAT delivery techniques. There are difficulties in IMRT planning using existing commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) to meet the PLDR protocol. This work focuses on PLDR using ten‐field IMRT and a commercial TPS for two specific sites: recurrent lung cancers and head and neck cancers. Our PLDR protocol requires that the maximum dose to the PTV be less than 0.4 Gy and the mean dose to be 0.2 Gy per field. We investigated various planning strategies to meet the PLDR requirements for 20 lung and head and neck patients. The PTV volume for lung cases ranged from 101.7 to 919.4 cm(3) and the maximum dose to the PTV ranged from 0.22 to 0.39 Gy. The PTV volume for head and neck cases ranged from 66.2 to 282.1 cm(3) and the maximum dose to the PTV ranged from 0.21 to 0.39 Gy. With special beam arrangements and dosimetry parameters, it is feasible to use a commercial TPS to generate quality PLDR IMRT plans for lung and head and neck reirradiation. PACS number: 87.55.D‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57110512018-04-02 Optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers Kang, Shengwei Lang, Jinyi Wang, Pei Li, Jie Lin, Muhan Chen, Xiaoming Guo, Ming Chen, Fu Chen, Lili Ma, Chang Ming J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Pulsed low‐dose‐rate radiotherapy (PLDR) has been proven to be a valid method of reirradiation. Previous studies of recurrent cancer radiotherapy were mainly based on conventional 3D CRT and VMAT delivery techniques. There are difficulties in IMRT planning using existing commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) to meet the PLDR protocol. This work focuses on PLDR using ten‐field IMRT and a commercial TPS for two specific sites: recurrent lung cancers and head and neck cancers. Our PLDR protocol requires that the maximum dose to the PTV be less than 0.4 Gy and the mean dose to be 0.2 Gy per field. We investigated various planning strategies to meet the PLDR requirements for 20 lung and head and neck patients. The PTV volume for lung cases ranged from 101.7 to 919.4 cm(3) and the maximum dose to the PTV ranged from 0.22 to 0.39 Gy. The PTV volume for head and neck cases ranged from 66.2 to 282.1 cm(3) and the maximum dose to the PTV ranged from 0.21 to 0.39 Gy. With special beam arrangements and dosimetry parameters, it is feasible to use a commercial TPS to generate quality PLDR IMRT plans for lung and head and neck reirradiation. PACS number: 87.55.D‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711051/ /pubmed/24892337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4661 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Kang, Shengwei
Lang, Jinyi
Wang, Pei
Li, Jie
Lin, Muhan
Chen, Xiaoming
Guo, Ming
Chen, Fu
Chen, Lili
Ma, Chang Ming
Optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers
title Optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers
title_full Optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers
title_fullStr Optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers
title_full_unstemmed Optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers
title_short Optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate IMRT of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers
title_sort optimization strategies for pulsed low‐dose‐rate imrt of recurrent lung and head and neck cancers
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4661
work_keys_str_mv AT kangshengwei optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT langjinyi optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT wangpei optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT lijie optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT linmuhan optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT chenxiaoming optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT guoming optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT chenfu optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT chenlili optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers
AT machangming optimizationstrategiesforpulsedlowdoserateimrtofrecurrentlungandheadandneckcancers