Cargando…

Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning

Metal objects in the body such as hip prostheses cause artifacts in CT images. When CT images degraded by artifacts are used for treatment planning of radiotherapy, the artifacts can yield inaccurate dose calculations and, for particle beams, erroneous penetration depths. A metal artifact reduction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersson, Karin M., Ahnesjö, Anders, Dahlgren, Christina Vallhagen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4857
_version_ 1783283002488389632
author Andersson, Karin M.
Ahnesjö, Anders
Dahlgren, Christina Vallhagen
author_facet Andersson, Karin M.
Ahnesjö, Anders
Dahlgren, Christina Vallhagen
author_sort Andersson, Karin M.
collection PubMed
description Metal objects in the body such as hip prostheses cause artifacts in CT images. When CT images degraded by artifacts are used for treatment planning of radiotherapy, the artifacts can yield inaccurate dose calculations and, for particle beams, erroneous penetration depths. A metal artifact reduction software (O‐MAR) installed on a Philips Brilliance Big Bore CT has been tested for applications in treatment planning of proton radiotherapy. Hip prostheses mounted in a water phantom were used as test objects. Images without metal objects were acquired and used as reference data for the analysis of artifact‐affected regions outside of the metal objects in both the O‐MAR corrected and the uncorrected images. Water equivalent thicknesses (WET) based on proton stopping power data were calculated to quantify differences in the calculated proton beam penetration for the different image sets. The WET to a selected point of interest between the hip prostheses was calculated for several beam directions of clinical relevance. The results show that the calculated differences in WET relative to the reference case were decreased when the O‐MAR algorithm was applied. WET differences up to 2.0 cm were seen in the uncorrected case while, for the O‐MAR corrected case, the maximum difference was decreased to 0.4 cm. The O‐MAR algorithm can significantly improve the accuracy in proton range calculations. However, there are some residual effects, and the use of proton beam directions along artifact streaks should only be used with caution and appropriate margins. PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐, 87.57.cp
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57110742018-04-02 Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning Andersson, Karin M. Ahnesjö, Anders Dahlgren, Christina Vallhagen J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Metal objects in the body such as hip prostheses cause artifacts in CT images. When CT images degraded by artifacts are used for treatment planning of radiotherapy, the artifacts can yield inaccurate dose calculations and, for particle beams, erroneous penetration depths. A metal artifact reduction software (O‐MAR) installed on a Philips Brilliance Big Bore CT has been tested for applications in treatment planning of proton radiotherapy. Hip prostheses mounted in a water phantom were used as test objects. Images without metal objects were acquired and used as reference data for the analysis of artifact‐affected regions outside of the metal objects in both the O‐MAR corrected and the uncorrected images. Water equivalent thicknesses (WET) based on proton stopping power data were calculated to quantify differences in the calculated proton beam penetration for the different image sets. The WET to a selected point of interest between the hip prostheses was calculated for several beam directions of clinical relevance. The results show that the calculated differences in WET relative to the reference case were decreased when the O‐MAR algorithm was applied. WET differences up to 2.0 cm were seen in the uncorrected case while, for the O‐MAR corrected case, the maximum difference was decreased to 0.4 cm. The O‐MAR algorithm can significantly improve the accuracy in proton range calculations. However, there are some residual effects, and the use of proton beam directions along artifact streaks should only be used with caution and appropriate margins. PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐, 87.57.cp John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711074/ /pubmed/25207572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4857 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Andersson, Karin M.
Ahnesjö, Anders
Dahlgren, Christina Vallhagen
Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning
title Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning
title_fullStr Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning
title_short Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning
title_sort evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in ct studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4857
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonkarinm evaluationofametalartifactreductionalgorithminctstudiesusedforprotonradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT ahnesjoanders evaluationofametalartifactreductionalgorithminctstudiesusedforprotonradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT dahlgrenchristinavallhagen evaluationofametalartifactreductionalgorithminctstudiesusedforprotonradiotherapytreatmentplanning