Cargando…

Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and efficacy of an automated treatment plan verification, or “secondary check”, tool (Mobius3D), which uses a reference dataset to perform an independent three‐dimensional dose verification of the treatment planning system (TPS) dose calculation a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fontenot, Jonas D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4990
_version_ 1783283003185692672
author Fontenot, Jonas D.
author_facet Fontenot, Jonas D.
author_sort Fontenot, Jonas D.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and efficacy of an automated treatment plan verification, or “secondary check”, tool (Mobius3D), which uses a reference dataset to perform an independent three‐dimensional dose verification of the treatment planning system (TPS) dose calculation and assesses plan quality by comparing dose‐volume histograms to reference benchmarks. The accuracy of the Mobius3D (M3D) system was evaluated by comparing dose calculations from IMRT and VMAT plans with measurements in phantom geometries and with TPS calculated dose distributions in prostate, lung, and head and neck patients (ten each). For the patient cases, instances of DVH limits exceeding reference values were also recorded. M3D showed agreement with measured point and planar doses that was comparable to the TPS in phantom geometries. No statistically significant differences ([Formula: see text]) were noted. M3D dose distributions from VMAT plans in patient cases were in good agreement with the TPS, with an average of 99.5% of dose points showing [Formula: see text]. The M3D system also identified several plans that had exceeded dose‐volume limits specified by RTOG protocols for those sites. The M3D system showed dosimetric accuracy comparable with the TPS, and identified several plans that exceeded dosimetric benchmarks. The M3D system possesses the potential to enhance the current treatment plan verification paradigm and improve safety in the clinical treatment planning and review process. PACS number: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr,
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57110792018-04-02 Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning Fontenot, Jonas D. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and efficacy of an automated treatment plan verification, or “secondary check”, tool (Mobius3D), which uses a reference dataset to perform an independent three‐dimensional dose verification of the treatment planning system (TPS) dose calculation and assesses plan quality by comparing dose‐volume histograms to reference benchmarks. The accuracy of the Mobius3D (M3D) system was evaluated by comparing dose calculations from IMRT and VMAT plans with measurements in phantom geometries and with TPS calculated dose distributions in prostate, lung, and head and neck patients (ten each). For the patient cases, instances of DVH limits exceeding reference values were also recorded. M3D showed agreement with measured point and planar doses that was comparable to the TPS in phantom geometries. No statistically significant differences ([Formula: see text]) were noted. M3D dose distributions from VMAT plans in patient cases were in good agreement with the TPS, with an average of 99.5% of dose points showing [Formula: see text]. The M3D system also identified several plans that had exceeded dose‐volume limits specified by RTOG protocols for those sites. The M3D system showed dosimetric accuracy comparable with the TPS, and identified several plans that exceeded dosimetric benchmarks. The M3D system possesses the potential to enhance the current treatment plan verification paradigm and improve safety in the clinical treatment planning and review process. PACS number: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr, John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711079/ /pubmed/25207582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4990 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Fontenot, Jonas D.
Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
title Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
title_fullStr Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
title_short Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
title_sort evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy treatment planning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4990
work_keys_str_mv AT fontenotjonasd evaluationofanovelsecondarychecktoolforintensitymodulatedradiotherapytreatmentplanning