Cargando…
FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges
PET/CT imaging could improve delineation of rectal carcinoma gross tumor volume (GTV) and reduce interobserver variability. The objective of this work was to compare various functional volume delineation algorithms. We enrolled 31 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. The FDG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4696 |
Sumario: | PET/CT imaging could improve delineation of rectal carcinoma gross tumor volume (GTV) and reduce interobserver variability. The objective of this work was to compare various functional volume delineation algorithms. We enrolled 31 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. The FDG PET/CT and the high dose CT ([Formula: see text]) were performed in the radiation treatment position. For each patient, the anatomical [Formula: see text] was delineated based on the [Formula: see text] and compared to six different functional/metabolic [Formula: see text] derived from two automatic segmentation approaches (FLAB and a gradient‐based method); a relative threshold (45% of the [Formula: see text]) and an absolute threshold ([Formula: see text]), using two different commercially available software (Philips EBW4 and Segami OASIS). The spatial sizes and shapes of all volumes were compared using the conformity index (CI). All the delineated metabolic tumor volumes (MTVs) were significantly different. The MTVs were as follows [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; the gradient‐based method ([Formula: see text]); [Formula: see text]); [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]. CI between these various volumes ranged from 0.40 to 0.90. The mean CI between the different MTVs and the [Formula: see text] was [Formula: see text]. Finally, the DICOM transfer of MTVs led to additional volume variations. In conclusion, we observed large and statistically significant variations in tumor volume delineation according to the segmentation algorithms and the software products. The manipulation of PET/CT images and MTVs, such as the DICOM transfer to the Radiation Oncology Department, induced additional volume variations. PACS number: 87.55.D‐ |
---|