Cargando…
FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges
PET/CT imaging could improve delineation of rectal carcinoma gross tumor volume (GTV) and reduce interobserver variability. The objective of this work was to compare various functional volume delineation algorithms. We enrolled 31 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. The FDG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4696 |
_version_ | 1783283007806767104 |
---|---|
author | Withofs, Nadia Bernard, Claire van der Rest, Catherine Martinive, Philippe Hatt, Mathieu Jodogne, Sebastien Visvikis, Dimitris Lee, John A. Coucke, Philippe A. Hustinx, Roland |
author_facet | Withofs, Nadia Bernard, Claire van der Rest, Catherine Martinive, Philippe Hatt, Mathieu Jodogne, Sebastien Visvikis, Dimitris Lee, John A. Coucke, Philippe A. Hustinx, Roland |
author_sort | Withofs, Nadia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PET/CT imaging could improve delineation of rectal carcinoma gross tumor volume (GTV) and reduce interobserver variability. The objective of this work was to compare various functional volume delineation algorithms. We enrolled 31 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. The FDG PET/CT and the high dose CT ([Formula: see text]) were performed in the radiation treatment position. For each patient, the anatomical [Formula: see text] was delineated based on the [Formula: see text] and compared to six different functional/metabolic [Formula: see text] derived from two automatic segmentation approaches (FLAB and a gradient‐based method); a relative threshold (45% of the [Formula: see text]) and an absolute threshold ([Formula: see text]), using two different commercially available software (Philips EBW4 and Segami OASIS). The spatial sizes and shapes of all volumes were compared using the conformity index (CI). All the delineated metabolic tumor volumes (MTVs) were significantly different. The MTVs were as follows [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; the gradient‐based method ([Formula: see text]); [Formula: see text]); [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]. CI between these various volumes ranged from 0.40 to 0.90. The mean CI between the different MTVs and the [Formula: see text] was [Formula: see text]. Finally, the DICOM transfer of MTVs led to additional volume variations. In conclusion, we observed large and statistically significant variations in tumor volume delineation according to the segmentation algorithms and the software products. The manipulation of PET/CT images and MTVs, such as the DICOM transfer to the Radiation Oncology Department, induced additional volume variations. PACS number: 87.55.D‐ |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5711099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57110992018-04-02 FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges Withofs, Nadia Bernard, Claire van der Rest, Catherine Martinive, Philippe Hatt, Mathieu Jodogne, Sebastien Visvikis, Dimitris Lee, John A. Coucke, Philippe A. Hustinx, Roland J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PET/CT imaging could improve delineation of rectal carcinoma gross tumor volume (GTV) and reduce interobserver variability. The objective of this work was to compare various functional volume delineation algorithms. We enrolled 31 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. The FDG PET/CT and the high dose CT ([Formula: see text]) were performed in the radiation treatment position. For each patient, the anatomical [Formula: see text] was delineated based on the [Formula: see text] and compared to six different functional/metabolic [Formula: see text] derived from two automatic segmentation approaches (FLAB and a gradient‐based method); a relative threshold (45% of the [Formula: see text]) and an absolute threshold ([Formula: see text]), using two different commercially available software (Philips EBW4 and Segami OASIS). The spatial sizes and shapes of all volumes were compared using the conformity index (CI). All the delineated metabolic tumor volumes (MTVs) were significantly different. The MTVs were as follows [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; the gradient‐based method ([Formula: see text]); [Formula: see text]); [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]. CI between these various volumes ranged from 0.40 to 0.90. The mean CI between the different MTVs and the [Formula: see text] was [Formula: see text]. Finally, the DICOM transfer of MTVs led to additional volume variations. In conclusion, we observed large and statistically significant variations in tumor volume delineation according to the segmentation algorithms and the software products. The manipulation of PET/CT images and MTVs, such as the DICOM transfer to the Radiation Oncology Department, induced additional volume variations. PACS number: 87.55.D‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711099/ /pubmed/25207560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4696 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Withofs, Nadia Bernard, Claire van der Rest, Catherine Martinive, Philippe Hatt, Mathieu Jodogne, Sebastien Visvikis, Dimitris Lee, John A. Coucke, Philippe A. Hustinx, Roland FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges |
title | FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges |
title_full | FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges |
title_fullStr | FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges |
title_short | FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges |
title_sort | fdg pet/ct for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT withofsnadia fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT bernardclaire fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT vanderrestcatherine fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT martinivephilippe fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT hattmathieu fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT jodognesebastien fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT visvikisdimitris fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT leejohna fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT couckephilippea fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges AT hustinxroland fdgpetctforrectalcarcinomaradiotherapytreatmentplanningcomparisonoffunctionalvolumedelineationalgorithmsandclinicalchallenges |