Cargando…

Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy

Quality assurance (QA) of the image quality for image‐guided localization systems is crucial to ensure accurate visualization and localization of target volumes. In this study, a methodology was developed to assess and evaluate the constancy of the high‐contrast spatial resolution, dose, energy, con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanley, Dennis N., Papanikolaou, Nikos, Gutierrez, Alonso N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4877
_version_ 1783283008563838976
author Stanley, Dennis N.
Papanikolaou, Nikos
Gutierrez, Alonso N.
author_facet Stanley, Dennis N.
Papanikolaou, Nikos
Gutierrez, Alonso N.
author_sort Stanley, Dennis N.
collection PubMed
description Quality assurance (QA) of the image quality for image‐guided localization systems is crucial to ensure accurate visualization and localization of target volumes. In this study, a methodology was developed to assess and evaluate the constancy of the high‐contrast spatial resolution, dose, energy, contrast, and geometrical accuracy of the BrainLAB ExacTrac system. An in‐house fixation device was constructed to hold the QCkV‐1 phantom firmly and reproducibly against the face of the flat panel detectors. Two image sets per detector were acquired using ExacTrac preset console settings over a period of three months. The image sets were analyzed in PIPSpro and the following metrics were recorded: high‐contrast spatial resolution ([Formula: see text] (lp/mm)), noise, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio. Geometrical image accuracy was evaluated by assessing the length between to predetermined points of the QCkV‐1 phantom. Dose and kVp were recorded using the Unfors RaySafe Xi R/F Detector. The kVp and dose were evaluated for the following: Cranial Standard (CS) (80 kV,80 mA,80 ms), Thorax Standard (TS) (120 kV,160 mA,160 ms), Abdomen Standard (AS) (120 kV,160 mA,130 ms), and Pelvis Standard (PS) (120 kV,160 mA,160 ms). With regard to high‐contrast spatial resolution, the mean values of the [Formula: see text] (lp/mm), [Formula: see text] (lp/mm) and [Formula: see text] (lp/mm) for the left detector were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively, while for the right detector they were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Mean CNRs for the left and right detectors were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively. For geometrical accuracy, both detectors had a measured image length of the QCkV‐1 of [Formula: see text]. The left detector showed dose measurements of [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , while the right detector showed [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. For X‐ray energy, the left detector (right X‐ray tube) had mean kVp readings of [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , and the right detector (left X‐ray tube) had [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text]. Run charts were created so that each parameter could be tracked over time and the constancy of the system could be monitored. A methodology was developed to assess the basic image quality parameters recommended by TG‐142 for the ExacTrac system. The ExacTrac system shows a consistent dose, kVp, high‐contrast spatial resolution, CNR, and geometrical accuracy for each detector over the evaluated timeframe. PACS number: 87.10.‐e
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57111022018-04-02 Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy Stanley, Dennis N. Papanikolaou, Nikos Gutierrez, Alonso N. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Quality assurance (QA) of the image quality for image‐guided localization systems is crucial to ensure accurate visualization and localization of target volumes. In this study, a methodology was developed to assess and evaluate the constancy of the high‐contrast spatial resolution, dose, energy, contrast, and geometrical accuracy of the BrainLAB ExacTrac system. An in‐house fixation device was constructed to hold the QCkV‐1 phantom firmly and reproducibly against the face of the flat panel detectors. Two image sets per detector were acquired using ExacTrac preset console settings over a period of three months. The image sets were analyzed in PIPSpro and the following metrics were recorded: high‐contrast spatial resolution ([Formula: see text] (lp/mm)), noise, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio. Geometrical image accuracy was evaluated by assessing the length between to predetermined points of the QCkV‐1 phantom. Dose and kVp were recorded using the Unfors RaySafe Xi R/F Detector. The kVp and dose were evaluated for the following: Cranial Standard (CS) (80 kV,80 mA,80 ms), Thorax Standard (TS) (120 kV,160 mA,160 ms), Abdomen Standard (AS) (120 kV,160 mA,130 ms), and Pelvis Standard (PS) (120 kV,160 mA,160 ms). With regard to high‐contrast spatial resolution, the mean values of the [Formula: see text] (lp/mm), [Formula: see text] (lp/mm) and [Formula: see text] (lp/mm) for the left detector were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively, while for the right detector they were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Mean CNRs for the left and right detectors were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively. For geometrical accuracy, both detectors had a measured image length of the QCkV‐1 of [Formula: see text]. The left detector showed dose measurements of [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , while the right detector showed [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. For X‐ray energy, the left detector (right X‐ray tube) had mean kVp readings of [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , and the right detector (left X‐ray tube) had [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text]. Run charts were created so that each parameter could be tracked over time and the constancy of the system could be monitored. A methodology was developed to assess the basic image quality parameters recommended by TG‐142 for the ExacTrac system. The ExacTrac system shows a consistent dose, kVp, high‐contrast spatial resolution, CNR, and geometrical accuracy for each detector over the evaluated timeframe. PACS number: 87.10.‐e John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711102/ /pubmed/25493511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4877 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Stanley, Dennis N.
Papanikolaou, Nikos
Gutierrez, Alonso N.
Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy
title Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy
title_full Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy
title_fullStr Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy
title_short Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy
title_sort development of image quality assurance measures of the exactrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4877
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleydennisn developmentofimagequalityassurancemeasuresoftheexactraclocalizationsystemusingcommerciallyavailableimageevaluationsoftwareandhardwareforimageguidedradiotherapy
AT papanikolaounikos developmentofimagequalityassurancemeasuresoftheexactraclocalizationsystemusingcommerciallyavailableimageevaluationsoftwareandhardwareforimageguidedradiotherapy
AT gutierrezalonson developmentofimagequalityassurancemeasuresoftheexactraclocalizationsystemusingcommerciallyavailableimageevaluationsoftwareandhardwareforimageguidedradiotherapy