Cargando…
Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy
Quality assurance (QA) of the image quality for image‐guided localization systems is crucial to ensure accurate visualization and localization of target volumes. In this study, a methodology was developed to assess and evaluate the constancy of the high‐contrast spatial resolution, dose, energy, con...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4877 |
_version_ | 1783283008563838976 |
---|---|
author | Stanley, Dennis N. Papanikolaou, Nikos Gutierrez, Alonso N. |
author_facet | Stanley, Dennis N. Papanikolaou, Nikos Gutierrez, Alonso N. |
author_sort | Stanley, Dennis N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quality assurance (QA) of the image quality for image‐guided localization systems is crucial to ensure accurate visualization and localization of target volumes. In this study, a methodology was developed to assess and evaluate the constancy of the high‐contrast spatial resolution, dose, energy, contrast, and geometrical accuracy of the BrainLAB ExacTrac system. An in‐house fixation device was constructed to hold the QCkV‐1 phantom firmly and reproducibly against the face of the flat panel detectors. Two image sets per detector were acquired using ExacTrac preset console settings over a period of three months. The image sets were analyzed in PIPSpro and the following metrics were recorded: high‐contrast spatial resolution ([Formula: see text] (lp/mm)), noise, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio. Geometrical image accuracy was evaluated by assessing the length between to predetermined points of the QCkV‐1 phantom. Dose and kVp were recorded using the Unfors RaySafe Xi R/F Detector. The kVp and dose were evaluated for the following: Cranial Standard (CS) (80 kV,80 mA,80 ms), Thorax Standard (TS) (120 kV,160 mA,160 ms), Abdomen Standard (AS) (120 kV,160 mA,130 ms), and Pelvis Standard (PS) (120 kV,160 mA,160 ms). With regard to high‐contrast spatial resolution, the mean values of the [Formula: see text] (lp/mm), [Formula: see text] (lp/mm) and [Formula: see text] (lp/mm) for the left detector were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively, while for the right detector they were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Mean CNRs for the left and right detectors were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively. For geometrical accuracy, both detectors had a measured image length of the QCkV‐1 of [Formula: see text]. The left detector showed dose measurements of [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , while the right detector showed [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. For X‐ray energy, the left detector (right X‐ray tube) had mean kVp readings of [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , and the right detector (left X‐ray tube) had [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text]. Run charts were created so that each parameter could be tracked over time and the constancy of the system could be monitored. A methodology was developed to assess the basic image quality parameters recommended by TG‐142 for the ExacTrac system. The ExacTrac system shows a consistent dose, kVp, high‐contrast spatial resolution, CNR, and geometrical accuracy for each detector over the evaluated timeframe. PACS number: 87.10.‐e |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5711102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57111022018-04-02 Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy Stanley, Dennis N. Papanikolaou, Nikos Gutierrez, Alonso N. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Quality assurance (QA) of the image quality for image‐guided localization systems is crucial to ensure accurate visualization and localization of target volumes. In this study, a methodology was developed to assess and evaluate the constancy of the high‐contrast spatial resolution, dose, energy, contrast, and geometrical accuracy of the BrainLAB ExacTrac system. An in‐house fixation device was constructed to hold the QCkV‐1 phantom firmly and reproducibly against the face of the flat panel detectors. Two image sets per detector were acquired using ExacTrac preset console settings over a period of three months. The image sets were analyzed in PIPSpro and the following metrics were recorded: high‐contrast spatial resolution ([Formula: see text] (lp/mm)), noise, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio. Geometrical image accuracy was evaluated by assessing the length between to predetermined points of the QCkV‐1 phantom. Dose and kVp were recorded using the Unfors RaySafe Xi R/F Detector. The kVp and dose were evaluated for the following: Cranial Standard (CS) (80 kV,80 mA,80 ms), Thorax Standard (TS) (120 kV,160 mA,160 ms), Abdomen Standard (AS) (120 kV,160 mA,130 ms), and Pelvis Standard (PS) (120 kV,160 mA,160 ms). With regard to high‐contrast spatial resolution, the mean values of the [Formula: see text] (lp/mm), [Formula: see text] (lp/mm) and [Formula: see text] (lp/mm) for the left detector were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively, while for the right detector they were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Mean CNRs for the left and right detectors were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively. For geometrical accuracy, both detectors had a measured image length of the QCkV‐1 of [Formula: see text]. The left detector showed dose measurements of [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , while the right detector showed [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. For X‐ray energy, the left detector (right X‐ray tube) had mean kVp readings of [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , and the right detector (left X‐ray tube) had [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text]. Run charts were created so that each parameter could be tracked over time and the constancy of the system could be monitored. A methodology was developed to assess the basic image quality parameters recommended by TG‐142 for the ExacTrac system. The ExacTrac system shows a consistent dose, kVp, high‐contrast spatial resolution, CNR, and geometrical accuracy for each detector over the evaluated timeframe. PACS number: 87.10.‐e John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711102/ /pubmed/25493511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4877 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Stanley, Dennis N. Papanikolaou, Nikos Gutierrez, Alonso N. Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy |
title | Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_full | Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_short | Development of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_sort | development of image quality assurance measures of the exactrac localization system using commercially available image evaluation software and hardware for image‐guided radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4877 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stanleydennisn developmentofimagequalityassurancemeasuresoftheexactraclocalizationsystemusingcommerciallyavailableimageevaluationsoftwareandhardwareforimageguidedradiotherapy AT papanikolaounikos developmentofimagequalityassurancemeasuresoftheexactraclocalizationsystemusingcommerciallyavailableimageevaluationsoftwareandhardwareforimageguidedradiotherapy AT gutierrezalonson developmentofimagequalityassurancemeasuresoftheexactraclocalizationsystemusingcommerciallyavailableimageevaluationsoftwareandhardwareforimageguidedradiotherapy |