Cargando…

Surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients

Breast treatments are becoming increasingly complex as the use of modulated and partial breast therapies becomes more prevalent. These methods are predicated on accurate and precise positioning for treatment. However, the ability to quantify intrafraction motion has been limited by the excessive dos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiant, David B., Wentworth, Stacy, Maurer, Jacqueline M., Vanderstraeten, Caroline L., Terrell, Jonathon A., Sintay, Benjamin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4957
_version_ 1783283013730172928
author Wiant, David B.
Wentworth, Stacy
Maurer, Jacqueline M.
Vanderstraeten, Caroline L.
Terrell, Jonathon A.
Sintay, Benjamin J.
author_facet Wiant, David B.
Wentworth, Stacy
Maurer, Jacqueline M.
Vanderstraeten, Caroline L.
Terrell, Jonathon A.
Sintay, Benjamin J.
author_sort Wiant, David B.
collection PubMed
description Breast treatments are becoming increasingly complex as the use of modulated and partial breast therapies becomes more prevalent. These methods are predicated on accurate and precise positioning for treatment. However, the ability to quantify intrafraction motion has been limited by the excessive dose that would result from continuous X‐ray imaging throughout treatment. Recently, surface imaging has offered the opportunity to obtain 3D measurements of patient position throughout breast treatments without radiation exposure. Thirty free‐breathing breast patients were monitored with surface imaging for 831 monitoring sessions. Mean translations and rotations were calculated over each minute, each session, and over all sessions combined. The percentage of each session that the root mean squares (RMS) of the linear translations were outside of defined tolerances was determined for each patient. Correlations between mean translations per minute and time, and between standard deviation per minute and time, were evaluated using Pearson's r value. The mean RMS translation averaged over all patients was [Formula: see text]. The patients spent an average of 34%, 17%, 9%, and 5% of the monitoring time outside of 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm RMS tolerances, respectively. The RMS values averaged over all patients were [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] over the 5th, 10th, and 15th minutes of monitoring, respectively. The RMS values ([Formula: see text]) and standard deviations ([Formula: see text]) over all patients showed strong significant correlations with time. We see that the majority of patients' treatment time is spent within 5 mm of the isocenter and that patient position drifts with increasing treatment time. Treatment length should be considered in the planning process. An 8 mm margin on a target volume would account for 2 SDs of motion for a treatment up to 15 minutes in length. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.53.Kn, 87.56.Da, 87.63.L‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57111232018-04-02 Surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients Wiant, David B. Wentworth, Stacy Maurer, Jacqueline M. Vanderstraeten, Caroline L. Terrell, Jonathon A. Sintay, Benjamin J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Breast treatments are becoming increasingly complex as the use of modulated and partial breast therapies becomes more prevalent. These methods are predicated on accurate and precise positioning for treatment. However, the ability to quantify intrafraction motion has been limited by the excessive dose that would result from continuous X‐ray imaging throughout treatment. Recently, surface imaging has offered the opportunity to obtain 3D measurements of patient position throughout breast treatments without radiation exposure. Thirty free‐breathing breast patients were monitored with surface imaging for 831 monitoring sessions. Mean translations and rotations were calculated over each minute, each session, and over all sessions combined. The percentage of each session that the root mean squares (RMS) of the linear translations were outside of defined tolerances was determined for each patient. Correlations between mean translations per minute and time, and between standard deviation per minute and time, were evaluated using Pearson's r value. The mean RMS translation averaged over all patients was [Formula: see text]. The patients spent an average of 34%, 17%, 9%, and 5% of the monitoring time outside of 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm RMS tolerances, respectively. The RMS values averaged over all patients were [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] over the 5th, 10th, and 15th minutes of monitoring, respectively. The RMS values ([Formula: see text]) and standard deviations ([Formula: see text]) over all patients showed strong significant correlations with time. We see that the majority of patients' treatment time is spent within 5 mm of the isocenter and that patient position drifts with increasing treatment time. Treatment length should be considered in the planning process. An 8 mm margin on a target volume would account for 2 SDs of motion for a treatment up to 15 minutes in length. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.53.Kn, 87.56.Da, 87.63.L‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711123/ /pubmed/25493520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4957 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Wiant, David B.
Wentworth, Stacy
Maurer, Jacqueline M.
Vanderstraeten, Caroline L.
Terrell, Jonathon A.
Sintay, Benjamin J.
Surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients
title Surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients
title_full Surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients
title_fullStr Surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients
title_full_unstemmed Surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients
title_short Surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients
title_sort surface imaging‐based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4957
work_keys_str_mv AT wiantdavidb surfaceimagingbasedanalysisofintrafractionmotionforbreastradiotherapypatients
AT wentworthstacy surfaceimagingbasedanalysisofintrafractionmotionforbreastradiotherapypatients
AT maurerjacquelinem surfaceimagingbasedanalysisofintrafractionmotionforbreastradiotherapypatients
AT vanderstraetencarolinel surfaceimagingbasedanalysisofintrafractionmotionforbreastradiotherapypatients
AT terrelljonathona surfaceimagingbasedanalysisofintrafractionmotionforbreastradiotherapypatients
AT sintaybenjaminj surfaceimagingbasedanalysisofintrafractionmotionforbreastradiotherapypatients