Cargando…

Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations

Following linear accelerator commissioning, the qualified medical physicist is responsible for monitoring the machine's ongoing performance, detecting and investigating any changes in beam properties, and assessing the impact of unscheduled repairs. In support of these responsibilities, the aut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritter, Timothy A., Gallagher, Ian, Roberson, Peter L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4749
_version_ 1783283014679134208
author Ritter, Timothy A.
Gallagher, Ian
Roberson, Peter L.
author_facet Ritter, Timothy A.
Gallagher, Ian
Roberson, Peter L.
author_sort Ritter, Timothy A.
collection PubMed
description Following linear accelerator commissioning, the qualified medical physicist is responsible for monitoring the machine's ongoing performance, detecting and investigating any changes in beam properties, and assessing the impact of unscheduled repairs. In support of these responsibilities, the authors developed a method of using a 2D ionization chamber array to efficiently test and validate important linear accelerator photon beam properties. A team of three physicists identified critical properties of the accelerator and developed constancy tests that were sensitive to each of the properties. The result was a 14‐field test plan. The test plan includes large and small fields at varying depths, a reduced SSD field at shallow depth for sensitivity to extra focal photon and electron components, and analysis of flatness, symmetry, dose, dose profiles, and dose ratios. Constancy tests were repeated five times over a period of six weeks and used to set upper and lower investigation levels at [Formula: see text] SDs. Deliberate variations in output, penumbra, and energy were tested to determine the suitability of the proposed method. Measurements were also performed on a similar, but distinct, machine to assess test sensitivity. The results demonstrated upper and lower investigation levels significantly smaller than the comparable TG‐142 annual recommendations, with the exception of the surrogate used for output calibration, which still fell within the TG‐142 monthly recommendation. Subtle changes in output, beam energy, and penumbra were swiftly identified for further investigation. The test set identified the distinct nature of the second accelerator. The beam properties of two photon energies can be validated in approximately 1.5 hrs using this method. The test suite can be used to evaluate the impact of minor repairs, detect changes in machine performance over time, and supplement other machine quality assurance testing. PACS numbers: 87.56bd, 87.56Fc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57111272018-04-02 Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations Ritter, Timothy A. Gallagher, Ian Roberson, Peter L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Following linear accelerator commissioning, the qualified medical physicist is responsible for monitoring the machine's ongoing performance, detecting and investigating any changes in beam properties, and assessing the impact of unscheduled repairs. In support of these responsibilities, the authors developed a method of using a 2D ionization chamber array to efficiently test and validate important linear accelerator photon beam properties. A team of three physicists identified critical properties of the accelerator and developed constancy tests that were sensitive to each of the properties. The result was a 14‐field test plan. The test plan includes large and small fields at varying depths, a reduced SSD field at shallow depth for sensitivity to extra focal photon and electron components, and analysis of flatness, symmetry, dose, dose profiles, and dose ratios. Constancy tests were repeated five times over a period of six weeks and used to set upper and lower investigation levels at [Formula: see text] SDs. Deliberate variations in output, penumbra, and energy were tested to determine the suitability of the proposed method. Measurements were also performed on a similar, but distinct, machine to assess test sensitivity. The results demonstrated upper and lower investigation levels significantly smaller than the comparable TG‐142 annual recommendations, with the exception of the surrogate used for output calibration, which still fell within the TG‐142 monthly recommendation. Subtle changes in output, beam energy, and penumbra were swiftly identified for further investigation. The test set identified the distinct nature of the second accelerator. The beam properties of two photon energies can be validated in approximately 1.5 hrs using this method. The test suite can be used to evaluate the impact of minor repairs, detect changes in machine performance over time, and supplement other machine quality assurance testing. PACS numbers: 87.56bd, 87.56Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5711127/ /pubmed/25493506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4749 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ritter, Timothy A.
Gallagher, Ian
Roberson, Peter L.
Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations
title Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations
title_full Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations
title_fullStr Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations
title_full_unstemmed Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations
title_short Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations
title_sort using a 2d detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4749
work_keys_str_mv AT rittertimothya usinga2ddetectorarrayformeaningfulandefficientlinearacceleratorbeampropertyvalidations
AT gallagherian usinga2ddetectorarrayformeaningfulandefficientlinearacceleratorbeampropertyvalidations
AT robersonpeterl usinga2ddetectorarrayformeaningfulandefficientlinearacceleratorbeampropertyvalidations