Cargando…

Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions

This study aimed to compare combined audio‐visual coaching with audio coaching alone and assess their respective impact on the reproducibility of external breathing motion and, one step further, on the internal lung tumor motion itself, through successive sessions. Thirteen patients with NSCLC were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goossens, Samuel, Senny, Frédéric, Lee, John Aldo, Janssens, Guillaume, Geets, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4332
_version_ 1783283036372074496
author Goossens, Samuel
Senny, Frédéric
Lee, John Aldo
Janssens, Guillaume
Geets, Xavier
author_facet Goossens, Samuel
Senny, Frédéric
Lee, John Aldo
Janssens, Guillaume
Geets, Xavier
author_sort Goossens, Samuel
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare combined audio‐visual coaching with audio coaching alone and assess their respective impact on the reproducibility of external breathing motion and, one step further, on the internal lung tumor motion itself, through successive sessions. Thirteen patients with NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The tumor motion was assessed by three to four successive 4D CT sessions, while the breathing signal was measured from magnetic sensors positioned on the epigastric region. For all sessions, the breathing was regularized with either audio coaching alone (AC, [Formula: see text]) or combined with a real‐time visual feedback (A/VC, [Formula: see text]) when tolerated by the patients. Peak‐to‐peak amplitude, period and signal shape of both breathing and tumor motions were first measured. Then, the correlation between the respiratory signal and internal tumor motion over time was evaluated, as well as the residual tumor motion for a gated strategy. Although breathing and tumor motions were comparable between AC and AV/C groups, A/VC approach achieved better reproducibility through sessions than AC alone (mean tumor motion of [Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text] , and mean breathing motion of [Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text] , respectively). High internal/external correlation reproducibility was achieved in the superior‐inferior tumor motion direction for all patients. For the anterior‐posterior tumor motion direction, better correlation reproducibility has been observed when visual feedback has been used. For a displacement‐based gating approach, A/VC might also be recommended, since it led to smaller residual tumor motion within clinically relevant duty cycles. This study suggests that combining real‐time visual feedback with audio coaching might improve the reproducibility of key characteristics of the breathing pattern, and might thus be considered in the implementation of lung tumor radiotherapy. PACS number: 87
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57112232018-04-02 Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions Goossens, Samuel Senny, Frédéric Lee, John Aldo Janssens, Guillaume Geets, Xavier J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study aimed to compare combined audio‐visual coaching with audio coaching alone and assess their respective impact on the reproducibility of external breathing motion and, one step further, on the internal lung tumor motion itself, through successive sessions. Thirteen patients with NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The tumor motion was assessed by three to four successive 4D CT sessions, while the breathing signal was measured from magnetic sensors positioned on the epigastric region. For all sessions, the breathing was regularized with either audio coaching alone (AC, [Formula: see text]) or combined with a real‐time visual feedback (A/VC, [Formula: see text]) when tolerated by the patients. Peak‐to‐peak amplitude, period and signal shape of both breathing and tumor motions were first measured. Then, the correlation between the respiratory signal and internal tumor motion over time was evaluated, as well as the residual tumor motion for a gated strategy. Although breathing and tumor motions were comparable between AC and AV/C groups, A/VC approach achieved better reproducibility through sessions than AC alone (mean tumor motion of [Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text] , and mean breathing motion of [Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text] , respectively). High internal/external correlation reproducibility was achieved in the superior‐inferior tumor motion direction for all patients. For the anterior‐posterior tumor motion direction, better correlation reproducibility has been observed when visual feedback has been used. For a displacement‐based gating approach, A/VC might also be recommended, since it led to smaller residual tumor motion within clinically relevant duty cycles. This study suggests that combining real‐time visual feedback with audio coaching might improve the reproducibility of key characteristics of the breathing pattern, and might thus be considered in the implementation of lung tumor radiotherapy. PACS number: 87 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5711223/ /pubmed/24423834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4332 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Goossens, Samuel
Senny, Frédéric
Lee, John Aldo
Janssens, Guillaume
Geets, Xavier
Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions
title Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions
title_full Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions
title_fullStr Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions
title_short Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions
title_sort assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4d ct sessions
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4332
work_keys_str_mv AT goossenssamuel assessmentoftumormotionreproducibilitywithaudiovisualcoachingthroughsuccessive4dctsessions
AT sennyfrederic assessmentoftumormotionreproducibilitywithaudiovisualcoachingthroughsuccessive4dctsessions
AT leejohnaldo assessmentoftumormotionreproducibilitywithaudiovisualcoachingthroughsuccessive4dctsessions
AT janssensguillaume assessmentoftumormotionreproducibilitywithaudiovisualcoachingthroughsuccessive4dctsessions
AT geetsxavier assessmentoftumormotionreproducibilitywithaudiovisualcoachingthroughsuccessive4dctsessions