Cargando…

The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants

Philips Healthcare released a novel metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants (O‐MAR). Little information was available about its CT number accuracy. Since CT numbers are used for tissue heterogeneity corrections in external beam radiotherapy treatment planning, we performed a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilgers, Guido, Nuver, Tonnis, Minken, André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4597
_version_ 1783283040998391808
author Hilgers, Guido
Nuver, Tonnis
Minken, André
author_facet Hilgers, Guido
Nuver, Tonnis
Minken, André
author_sort Hilgers, Guido
collection PubMed
description Philips Healthcare released a novel metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants (O‐MAR). Little information was available about its CT number accuracy. Since CT numbers are used for tissue heterogeneity corrections in external beam radiotherapy treatment planning, we performed a phantom study to assess the CT number accuracy of O‐MAR. Two situations were simulated: a patient with a unilateral metallic hip prosthesis and a patient with bilateral metallic hip prostheses. We compared the CT numbers in the O‐MAR reconstructions of the simulations to those in the nonO‐MAR reconstruction and to those in a metal‐free baseline reconstruction. In both simulations, the CT number accuracy of the O‐MAR reconstruction was better than the CT number accuracy of the nonO‐MAR reconstruction. In the O‐MAR reconstruction of the unilateral simulation, all CT numbers were accurate within [Formula: see text] (AAPM criterion). In the O‐MAR reconstruction of the bilateral simulation, CT numbers were found that differed more than [Formula: see text] from the metal‐free baseline values. However, none of these differences were clinically relevant. PACS numbers: 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.cp
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57112422018-04-02 The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants Hilgers, Guido Nuver, Tonnis Minken, André J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Philips Healthcare released a novel metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants (O‐MAR). Little information was available about its CT number accuracy. Since CT numbers are used for tissue heterogeneity corrections in external beam radiotherapy treatment planning, we performed a phantom study to assess the CT number accuracy of O‐MAR. Two situations were simulated: a patient with a unilateral metallic hip prosthesis and a patient with bilateral metallic hip prostheses. We compared the CT numbers in the O‐MAR reconstructions of the simulations to those in the nonO‐MAR reconstruction and to those in a metal‐free baseline reconstruction. In both simulations, the CT number accuracy of the O‐MAR reconstruction was better than the CT number accuracy of the nonO‐MAR reconstruction. In the O‐MAR reconstruction of the unilateral simulation, all CT numbers were accurate within [Formula: see text] (AAPM criterion). In the O‐MAR reconstruction of the bilateral simulation, CT numbers were found that differed more than [Formula: see text] from the metal‐free baseline values. However, none of these differences were clinically relevant. PACS numbers: 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.cp John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5711242/ /pubmed/24423859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4597 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hilgers, Guido
Nuver, Tonnis
Minken, André
The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants
title The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants
title_full The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants
title_fullStr The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants
title_full_unstemmed The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants
title_short The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants
title_sort ct number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4597
work_keys_str_mv AT hilgersguido thectnumberaccuracyofanovelcommercialmetalartifactreductionalgorithmforlargeorthopedicimplants
AT nuvertonnis thectnumberaccuracyofanovelcommercialmetalartifactreductionalgorithmforlargeorthopedicimplants
AT minkenandre thectnumberaccuracyofanovelcommercialmetalartifactreductionalgorithmforlargeorthopedicimplants
AT hilgersguido ctnumberaccuracyofanovelcommercialmetalartifactreductionalgorithmforlargeorthopedicimplants
AT nuvertonnis ctnumberaccuracyofanovelcommercialmetalartifactreductionalgorithmforlargeorthopedicimplants
AT minkenandre ctnumberaccuracyofanovelcommercialmetalartifactreductionalgorithmforlargeorthopedicimplants