Cargando…
A bias‐free, automated planning tool for technique comparison in radiotherapy ‐ application to nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatments
In this study a novel, user‐independent automated planning technique was developed to objectively compare volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma planning, and to determine which technique offers a greater benefit for parotid‐s...
Autores principales: | Boylan, Christopher, Rowbottom, Carl |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4530 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry
por: Boylan, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Clinical assessment of a novel machine‐learning automated contouring tool for radiotherapy planning
por: Hu, Yunfei, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Evaluation of failure modes and effect analysis for routine risk assessment of lung radiotherapy at a UK center
por: Gilmore, Martyn D. F., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Automated field‐in‐field whole brain radiotherapy planning
por: Huang, Kai, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Development of an optimum photon beam model for head‐and‐neck intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
por: Webster, Gareth J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)