Cargando…

Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia

BACKGROUND: Governmental organizations are facing challenges in adjusting procedures providing equitable assistance to consumers with amputation choosing newly available osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) over socket-suspended prostheses. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frossard, Laurent, Merlo, Gregory, Quincey, Tanya, Burkett, Brendan, Berg, Debra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0032-5
_version_ 1783283079454916608
author Frossard, Laurent
Merlo, Gregory
Quincey, Tanya
Burkett, Brendan
Berg, Debra
author_facet Frossard, Laurent
Merlo, Gregory
Quincey, Tanya
Burkett, Brendan
Berg, Debra
author_sort Frossard, Laurent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Governmental organizations are facing challenges in adjusting procedures providing equitable assistance to consumers with amputation choosing newly available osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) over socket-suspended prostheses. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) present a procedure focusing on tasks, documents and costs of prosthetic care, and (2) share observed obstacles and facilitators to implementation. METHODS: This research aimed at developing a governmental procedure for the provision of BAPs was designed as an action research study. A total of 18 individuals with transfemoral amputation solely funded by a Queensland State organization were considered. RESULTS: The procedure, developed between January 2011 and June 2015, included seven processes involving fixed expenses during treatment and five processes regulating ongoing prosthetic care expenses. Prosthetic care required 22 h of labor, corresponding to AUD$3300 per patient, during rehabilitation. Prosthetists spend 64 and 36% of their time focusing on prosthetic care and other activities, respectively. The procedure required adjustments related to the scope of practice of prosthetists, funding of prosthetic limbs during rehabilitation, and allocation of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. Approximately 41% (7) and 59% (10) of obstacles were within (e.g. streamlining systematic processes, sustaining evaluation of this complex procedure) or outside (e.g. early and consistent consultations of stakeholders, lack of a definitive rehabilitation program) governmental control, respectively, and approximately 89% (17) of the facilitators were within governmental control (e.g. adapting existing processes). CONCLUSION: This study provides a working plan to stakeholders developing and implementing policies around the care of individuals choosing osseointegration for BAPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5711750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57117502017-12-18 Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia Frossard, Laurent Merlo, Gregory Quincey, Tanya Burkett, Brendan Berg, Debra Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Governmental organizations are facing challenges in adjusting procedures providing equitable assistance to consumers with amputation choosing newly available osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) over socket-suspended prostheses. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) present a procedure focusing on tasks, documents and costs of prosthetic care, and (2) share observed obstacles and facilitators to implementation. METHODS: This research aimed at developing a governmental procedure for the provision of BAPs was designed as an action research study. A total of 18 individuals with transfemoral amputation solely funded by a Queensland State organization were considered. RESULTS: The procedure, developed between January 2011 and June 2015, included seven processes involving fixed expenses during treatment and five processes regulating ongoing prosthetic care expenses. Prosthetic care required 22 h of labor, corresponding to AUD$3300 per patient, during rehabilitation. Prosthetists spend 64 and 36% of their time focusing on prosthetic care and other activities, respectively. The procedure required adjustments related to the scope of practice of prosthetists, funding of prosthetic limbs during rehabilitation, and allocation of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. Approximately 41% (7) and 59% (10) of obstacles were within (e.g. streamlining systematic processes, sustaining evaluation of this complex procedure) or outside (e.g. early and consistent consultations of stakeholders, lack of a definitive rehabilitation program) governmental control, respectively, and approximately 89% (17) of the facilitators were within governmental control (e.g. adapting existing processes). CONCLUSION: This study provides a working plan to stakeholders developing and implementing policies around the care of individuals choosing osseointegration for BAPs. Springer International Publishing 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5711750/ /pubmed/29441506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0032-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Frossard, Laurent
Merlo, Gregory
Quincey, Tanya
Burkett, Brendan
Berg, Debra
Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia
title Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia
title_full Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia
title_fullStr Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia
title_short Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia
title_sort development of a procedure for the government provision of bone-anchored prosthesis using osseointegration in australia
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0032-5
work_keys_str_mv AT frossardlaurent developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia
AT merlogregory developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia
AT quinceytanya developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia
AT burkettbrendan developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia
AT bergdebra developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia