Cargando…
Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia
BACKGROUND: Governmental organizations are facing challenges in adjusting procedures providing equitable assistance to consumers with amputation choosing newly available osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) over socket-suspended prostheses. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0032-5 |
_version_ | 1783283079454916608 |
---|---|
author | Frossard, Laurent Merlo, Gregory Quincey, Tanya Burkett, Brendan Berg, Debra |
author_facet | Frossard, Laurent Merlo, Gregory Quincey, Tanya Burkett, Brendan Berg, Debra |
author_sort | Frossard, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Governmental organizations are facing challenges in adjusting procedures providing equitable assistance to consumers with amputation choosing newly available osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) over socket-suspended prostheses. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) present a procedure focusing on tasks, documents and costs of prosthetic care, and (2) share observed obstacles and facilitators to implementation. METHODS: This research aimed at developing a governmental procedure for the provision of BAPs was designed as an action research study. A total of 18 individuals with transfemoral amputation solely funded by a Queensland State organization were considered. RESULTS: The procedure, developed between January 2011 and June 2015, included seven processes involving fixed expenses during treatment and five processes regulating ongoing prosthetic care expenses. Prosthetic care required 22 h of labor, corresponding to AUD$3300 per patient, during rehabilitation. Prosthetists spend 64 and 36% of their time focusing on prosthetic care and other activities, respectively. The procedure required adjustments related to the scope of practice of prosthetists, funding of prosthetic limbs during rehabilitation, and allocation of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. Approximately 41% (7) and 59% (10) of obstacles were within (e.g. streamlining systematic processes, sustaining evaluation of this complex procedure) or outside (e.g. early and consistent consultations of stakeholders, lack of a definitive rehabilitation program) governmental control, respectively, and approximately 89% (17) of the facilitators were within governmental control (e.g. adapting existing processes). CONCLUSION: This study provides a working plan to stakeholders developing and implementing policies around the care of individuals choosing osseointegration for BAPs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5711750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57117502017-12-18 Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia Frossard, Laurent Merlo, Gregory Quincey, Tanya Burkett, Brendan Berg, Debra Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Governmental organizations are facing challenges in adjusting procedures providing equitable assistance to consumers with amputation choosing newly available osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) over socket-suspended prostheses. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) present a procedure focusing on tasks, documents and costs of prosthetic care, and (2) share observed obstacles and facilitators to implementation. METHODS: This research aimed at developing a governmental procedure for the provision of BAPs was designed as an action research study. A total of 18 individuals with transfemoral amputation solely funded by a Queensland State organization were considered. RESULTS: The procedure, developed between January 2011 and June 2015, included seven processes involving fixed expenses during treatment and five processes regulating ongoing prosthetic care expenses. Prosthetic care required 22 h of labor, corresponding to AUD$3300 per patient, during rehabilitation. Prosthetists spend 64 and 36% of their time focusing on prosthetic care and other activities, respectively. The procedure required adjustments related to the scope of practice of prosthetists, funding of prosthetic limbs during rehabilitation, and allocation of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. Approximately 41% (7) and 59% (10) of obstacles were within (e.g. streamlining systematic processes, sustaining evaluation of this complex procedure) or outside (e.g. early and consistent consultations of stakeholders, lack of a definitive rehabilitation program) governmental control, respectively, and approximately 89% (17) of the facilitators were within governmental control (e.g. adapting existing processes). CONCLUSION: This study provides a working plan to stakeholders developing and implementing policies around the care of individuals choosing osseointegration for BAPs. Springer International Publishing 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5711750/ /pubmed/29441506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0032-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Frossard, Laurent Merlo, Gregory Quincey, Tanya Burkett, Brendan Berg, Debra Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia |
title | Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia |
title_full | Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia |
title_fullStr | Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia |
title_short | Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia |
title_sort | development of a procedure for the government provision of bone-anchored prosthesis using osseointegration in australia |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0032-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frossardlaurent developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia AT merlogregory developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia AT quinceytanya developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia AT burkettbrendan developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia AT bergdebra developmentofaprocedureforthegovernmentprovisionofboneanchoredprosthesisusingosseointegrationinaustralia |