Cargando…
Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China
From January 2010 to December 2016, 1616 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were evaluated for their predicted mortality according to the online Sino System for Coronary Operative Risk Evaluation (SinoSCORE), European System for Cardiac Operative Risk...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16925-x |
_version_ | 1783283102184898560 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Xiue Wang, Yunqian Shan, Lingtong Cang, Zhengqiang Gu, Chang Qu, Nianyi Li, Qifan Li, Jun Wang, Zhenhua Zhang, Yangyang |
author_facet | Ma, Xiue Wang, Yunqian Shan, Lingtong Cang, Zhengqiang Gu, Chang Qu, Nianyi Li, Qifan Li, Jun Wang, Zhenhua Zhang, Yangyang |
author_sort | Ma, Xiue |
collection | PubMed |
description | From January 2010 to December 2016, 1616 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were evaluated for their predicted mortality according to the online Sino System for Coronary Operative Risk Evaluation (SinoSCORE), European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk evaluation system. The calibration and discrimination in the total and in the subsets were assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistics and by the C statistics respectively, to evaluate the efficiency of the three risk evaluation systems. The realized mortality was 1.92% (31/1616). The predictive mortality of SinoSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system were 1.35%, 1.74% and 1.05%, respectively. SinoSCORE achieved best discrimination. When grouping by risk, SinoSCORE also achieved the best discrimination in high-risk group, followed by STS risk evaluation system and EuroSCORE II while SinoSCORE and EuroSCORE II had excellent performance in low-risk group. In terms of calibration, SinoSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system all achieved positive calibrations (H-L: P > 0.05) in the overall population and grouped subsets. SinoSCORE achieved good predictive efficiency in East China patients undergoing isolated CABG and showed no compromise when compared with EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5711857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57118572017-12-06 Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China Ma, Xiue Wang, Yunqian Shan, Lingtong Cang, Zhengqiang Gu, Chang Qu, Nianyi Li, Qifan Li, Jun Wang, Zhenhua Zhang, Yangyang Sci Rep Article From January 2010 to December 2016, 1616 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were evaluated for their predicted mortality according to the online Sino System for Coronary Operative Risk Evaluation (SinoSCORE), European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk evaluation system. The calibration and discrimination in the total and in the subsets were assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistics and by the C statistics respectively, to evaluate the efficiency of the three risk evaluation systems. The realized mortality was 1.92% (31/1616). The predictive mortality of SinoSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system were 1.35%, 1.74% and 1.05%, respectively. SinoSCORE achieved best discrimination. When grouping by risk, SinoSCORE also achieved the best discrimination in high-risk group, followed by STS risk evaluation system and EuroSCORE II while SinoSCORE and EuroSCORE II had excellent performance in low-risk group. In terms of calibration, SinoSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system all achieved positive calibrations (H-L: P > 0.05) in the overall population and grouped subsets. SinoSCORE achieved good predictive efficiency in East China patients undergoing isolated CABG and showed no compromise when compared with EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation system. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5711857/ /pubmed/29196738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16925-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Ma, Xiue Wang, Yunqian Shan, Lingtong Cang, Zhengqiang Gu, Chang Qu, Nianyi Li, Qifan Li, Jun Wang, Zhenhua Zhang, Yangyang Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China |
title | Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China |
title_full | Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China |
title_fullStr | Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China |
title_short | Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China |
title_sort | validation of sinoscore for isolated cabg operation in east china |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16925-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maxiue validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT wangyunqian validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT shanlingtong validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT cangzhengqiang validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT guchang validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT qunianyi validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT liqifan validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT lijun validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT wangzhenhua validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina AT zhangyangyang validationofsinoscoreforisolatedcabgoperationineastchina |