Cargando…

Intensive ground vegetation growth mitigates the carbon loss after forest disturbance

AIMS: Slow or failed tree regeneration after forest disturbance is increasingly observed in the central European Alps, potentially amplifying the carbon (C) loss from disturbance. We aimed at quantifying C dynamics of a poorly regenerating disturbance site with a special focus on the role of non-woo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zehetgruber, Bernhard, Kobler, Johannes, Dirnböck, Thomas, Jandl, Robert, Seidl, Rupert, Schindlbacher, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3384-9
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: Slow or failed tree regeneration after forest disturbance is increasingly observed in the central European Alps, potentially amplifying the carbon (C) loss from disturbance. We aimed at quantifying C dynamics of a poorly regenerating disturbance site with a special focus on the role of non-woody ground vegetation. METHODS: Soil CO(2) efflux, fine root biomass, ground vegetation biomass, tree increment and litter input were assessed in (i) an undisturbed section of a ~ 110 years old Norway spruce stand, (ii) in a disturbed section which was clear-cut six years ago (no tree regeneration), and (iii) in a disturbed section which was clear-cut three years ago (no tree regeneration). RESULTS: Total soil CO(2) efflux was similar across all stand sections (8.5 ± 0.2 to 8.9 ± 0.3 t C ha(−1) yr.(−1)). The undisturbed forest served as atmospheric C sink (2.1 t C ha(−1) yr.(−1)), whereas both clearings were C sources to the atmosphere. The source strength three years after disturbance (−5.5 t C ha(−1) yr.(−1)) was almost twice as high as six years after disturbance (−2.9 t C ha(−1) yr.(−1)), with declining heterotrophic soil respiration and the high productivity of dense graminoid ground vegetation mitigating C loss. CONCLUSIONS: C loss after disturbance decreases with time and ground vegetation growth. Dense non-woody ground vegetation cover can hamper tree regeneration but simultaneously decrease the ecosystem C loss. The role of ground vegetation should be more explicitly taken into account in forest C budgets assessing disturbance effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3384-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.