Cargando…

The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls

OBJECTIVE: Startling acoustic stimulation (SAS), via activation of reticulospinal (RS) pathways, has shown to increase muscle strength in healthy subjects. We hypothesized that, given RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors, SAS could increase muscle strength in stroke survivors. The objective was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Sheng, Bhadane, Minal, Gao, Fan, Zhou, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29230191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00627
_version_ 1783283154921979904
author Li, Sheng
Bhadane, Minal
Gao, Fan
Zhou, Ping
author_facet Li, Sheng
Bhadane, Minal
Gao, Fan
Zhou, Ping
author_sort Li, Sheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Startling acoustic stimulation (SAS), via activation of reticulospinal (RS) pathways, has shown to increase muscle strength in healthy subjects. We hypothesized that, given RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors, SAS could increase muscle strength in stroke survivors. The objective was to quantify the effect of SAS on maximal and sub-maximal voluntary elbow flexion on the contralesional (impaired) side in stroke survivors as compared to ipsilesional (non-impaired) side and healthy controls. DESIGN: Thirteen hemiparetic stroke survivors and 12 healthy subjects volunteered for this investigation. Acoustic stimulation was given at rest, during ballistic maximal and sustained sub-maximal isometric elbow contractions using low (80 dB) and high intensity sound (105 dB). The effect of acoustic stimuli was evaluated from EMG and force recordings. RESULTS: Prevalence of acoustic startle reflex with shorter latency in the impaired biceps was greater as compared to the response in the non-impaired side of stroke subjects and in healthy subjects. Delivery of SAS resulted in earlier initiation of elbow flexion and greater peak torque in healthy subjects and in stroke subjects with spastic hemiplegia during maximal voluntary elbow flexion tasks. During sub-maximal elbow flexion tasks, SAS-induced force responses were slightly greater on the impaired side than the non-impaired side. However, no statistically significant difference was found in SAS-induced responses between impaired and non-impaired sides at maximal and sub-maximal elbow flexion tasks. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors with spastic hemiplegia. The results of similar SAS-induced responses between healthy and stroke subjects indicate that RS projections via acoustic stimulation are not likely to contribute to muscle strength for stroke survivors to a significant extent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5712067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57120672017-12-11 The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls Li, Sheng Bhadane, Minal Gao, Fan Zhou, Ping Front Neurol Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: Startling acoustic stimulation (SAS), via activation of reticulospinal (RS) pathways, has shown to increase muscle strength in healthy subjects. We hypothesized that, given RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors, SAS could increase muscle strength in stroke survivors. The objective was to quantify the effect of SAS on maximal and sub-maximal voluntary elbow flexion on the contralesional (impaired) side in stroke survivors as compared to ipsilesional (non-impaired) side and healthy controls. DESIGN: Thirteen hemiparetic stroke survivors and 12 healthy subjects volunteered for this investigation. Acoustic stimulation was given at rest, during ballistic maximal and sustained sub-maximal isometric elbow contractions using low (80 dB) and high intensity sound (105 dB). The effect of acoustic stimuli was evaluated from EMG and force recordings. RESULTS: Prevalence of acoustic startle reflex with shorter latency in the impaired biceps was greater as compared to the response in the non-impaired side of stroke subjects and in healthy subjects. Delivery of SAS resulted in earlier initiation of elbow flexion and greater peak torque in healthy subjects and in stroke subjects with spastic hemiplegia during maximal voluntary elbow flexion tasks. During sub-maximal elbow flexion tasks, SAS-induced force responses were slightly greater on the impaired side than the non-impaired side. However, no statistically significant difference was found in SAS-induced responses between impaired and non-impaired sides at maximal and sub-maximal elbow flexion tasks. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors with spastic hemiplegia. The results of similar SAS-induced responses between healthy and stroke subjects indicate that RS projections via acoustic stimulation are not likely to contribute to muscle strength for stroke survivors to a significant extent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5712067/ /pubmed/29230191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00627 Text en Copyright © 2017 Li, Bhadane, Gao and Zhou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Li, Sheng
Bhadane, Minal
Gao, Fan
Zhou, Ping
The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls
title The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls
title_full The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls
title_fullStr The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls
title_full_unstemmed The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls
title_short The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls
title_sort reticulospinal pathway does not increase its contribution to the strength of contralesional muscles in stroke survivors as compared to ipsilesional side or healthy controls
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29230191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00627
work_keys_str_mv AT lisheng thereticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols
AT bhadaneminal thereticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols
AT gaofan thereticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols
AT zhouping thereticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols
AT lisheng reticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols
AT bhadaneminal reticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols
AT gaofan reticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols
AT zhouping reticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols