Cargando…
The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls
OBJECTIVE: Startling acoustic stimulation (SAS), via activation of reticulospinal (RS) pathways, has shown to increase muscle strength in healthy subjects. We hypothesized that, given RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors, SAS could increase muscle strength in stroke survivors. The objective was...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29230191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00627 |
_version_ | 1783283154921979904 |
---|---|
author | Li, Sheng Bhadane, Minal Gao, Fan Zhou, Ping |
author_facet | Li, Sheng Bhadane, Minal Gao, Fan Zhou, Ping |
author_sort | Li, Sheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Startling acoustic stimulation (SAS), via activation of reticulospinal (RS) pathways, has shown to increase muscle strength in healthy subjects. We hypothesized that, given RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors, SAS could increase muscle strength in stroke survivors. The objective was to quantify the effect of SAS on maximal and sub-maximal voluntary elbow flexion on the contralesional (impaired) side in stroke survivors as compared to ipsilesional (non-impaired) side and healthy controls. DESIGN: Thirteen hemiparetic stroke survivors and 12 healthy subjects volunteered for this investigation. Acoustic stimulation was given at rest, during ballistic maximal and sustained sub-maximal isometric elbow contractions using low (80 dB) and high intensity sound (105 dB). The effect of acoustic stimuli was evaluated from EMG and force recordings. RESULTS: Prevalence of acoustic startle reflex with shorter latency in the impaired biceps was greater as compared to the response in the non-impaired side of stroke subjects and in healthy subjects. Delivery of SAS resulted in earlier initiation of elbow flexion and greater peak torque in healthy subjects and in stroke subjects with spastic hemiplegia during maximal voluntary elbow flexion tasks. During sub-maximal elbow flexion tasks, SAS-induced force responses were slightly greater on the impaired side than the non-impaired side. However, no statistically significant difference was found in SAS-induced responses between impaired and non-impaired sides at maximal and sub-maximal elbow flexion tasks. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors with spastic hemiplegia. The results of similar SAS-induced responses between healthy and stroke subjects indicate that RS projections via acoustic stimulation are not likely to contribute to muscle strength for stroke survivors to a significant extent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5712067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57120672017-12-11 The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls Li, Sheng Bhadane, Minal Gao, Fan Zhou, Ping Front Neurol Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: Startling acoustic stimulation (SAS), via activation of reticulospinal (RS) pathways, has shown to increase muscle strength in healthy subjects. We hypothesized that, given RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors, SAS could increase muscle strength in stroke survivors. The objective was to quantify the effect of SAS on maximal and sub-maximal voluntary elbow flexion on the contralesional (impaired) side in stroke survivors as compared to ipsilesional (non-impaired) side and healthy controls. DESIGN: Thirteen hemiparetic stroke survivors and 12 healthy subjects volunteered for this investigation. Acoustic stimulation was given at rest, during ballistic maximal and sustained sub-maximal isometric elbow contractions using low (80 dB) and high intensity sound (105 dB). The effect of acoustic stimuli was evaluated from EMG and force recordings. RESULTS: Prevalence of acoustic startle reflex with shorter latency in the impaired biceps was greater as compared to the response in the non-impaired side of stroke subjects and in healthy subjects. Delivery of SAS resulted in earlier initiation of elbow flexion and greater peak torque in healthy subjects and in stroke subjects with spastic hemiplegia during maximal voluntary elbow flexion tasks. During sub-maximal elbow flexion tasks, SAS-induced force responses were slightly greater on the impaired side than the non-impaired side. However, no statistically significant difference was found in SAS-induced responses between impaired and non-impaired sides at maximal and sub-maximal elbow flexion tasks. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest RS hyperexcitability in stroke survivors with spastic hemiplegia. The results of similar SAS-induced responses between healthy and stroke subjects indicate that RS projections via acoustic stimulation are not likely to contribute to muscle strength for stroke survivors to a significant extent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5712067/ /pubmed/29230191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00627 Text en Copyright © 2017 Li, Bhadane, Gao and Zhou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Li, Sheng Bhadane, Minal Gao, Fan Zhou, Ping The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls |
title | The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls |
title_full | The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls |
title_fullStr | The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls |
title_short | The Reticulospinal Pathway Does Not Increase Its Contribution to the Strength of Contralesional Muscles in Stroke Survivors as Compared to Ipsilesional Side or Healthy Controls |
title_sort | reticulospinal pathway does not increase its contribution to the strength of contralesional muscles in stroke survivors as compared to ipsilesional side or healthy controls |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29230191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lisheng thereticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols AT bhadaneminal thereticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols AT gaofan thereticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols AT zhouping thereticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols AT lisheng reticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols AT bhadaneminal reticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols AT gaofan reticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols AT zhouping reticulospinalpathwaydoesnotincreaseitscontributiontothestrengthofcontralesionalmusclesinstrokesurvivorsascomparedtoipsilesionalsideorhealthycontrols |