Cargando…

Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria

BACKGROUND: Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydia abortus and Leptospira spp. are difficult to grow bacteria that play a role in bovine abortion, but their diagnosis is hampered by their obligate intracellular lifestyle (C. burnetii, C. abortus) or their lability (Leptospira spp.). Their importance is based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vidal, Sara, Kegler, Kristel, Greub, Gilbert, Aeby, Sebastien, Borel, Nicole, Dagleish, Mark P., Posthaus, Horst, Perreten, Vincent, Rodriguez-Campos, Sabrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1294-y
_version_ 1783283159235821568
author Vidal, Sara
Kegler, Kristel
Greub, Gilbert
Aeby, Sebastien
Borel, Nicole
Dagleish, Mark P.
Posthaus, Horst
Perreten, Vincent
Rodriguez-Campos, Sabrina
author_facet Vidal, Sara
Kegler, Kristel
Greub, Gilbert
Aeby, Sebastien
Borel, Nicole
Dagleish, Mark P.
Posthaus, Horst
Perreten, Vincent
Rodriguez-Campos, Sabrina
author_sort Vidal, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydia abortus and Leptospira spp. are difficult to grow bacteria that play a role in bovine abortion, but their diagnosis is hampered by their obligate intracellular lifestyle (C. burnetii, C. abortus) or their lability (Leptospira spp.). Their importance is based on the contagious spread in food-producing animals, but also as zoonotic agents. In Switzerland, first-line routine bacteriological diagnostics in cattle abortions is regulated by national law and includes only basic screening by staining for C. burnetii due to the high costs associated with extended spectrum analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the true occurrence of these zoonotic pathogens in 249 cases of bovine abortion in Switzerland by serology (ELISA for anti-C. burnetii and C. abortus antibodies and microscopic agglutination test for anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies), molecular methods (real-time PCR and sequencing of PCR products of Chlamydiales-positive cases), Stamp’s modification of the Ziehl-Neelsen (mod-ZN) stain and, upon availability of material, by histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: After seroanalysis the prevalence was 15.9% for C. burnetii, 38.5% for C. abortus and 21.4% for Leptospira spp. By real-time PCR 12.1% and 16.9% of the cases were positive for C. burnetii and Chlamydiales, respectively, but only 2.4% were positive for C. burnetii or Chlamydiales by mod-ZN stain. Sequencing of PCR products of Chlamydiales-positive cases revealed C. abortus in 10% of cases and the presence of a mix of Chlamydiales-related bacteria in 5.2% of cases. Pathogenic Leptospira spp. were detected in 5.6% of cases. Inflammatory lesions were present histologically in all available samples which were real-time PCR-positive for Chlamydiales and Leptospira spp. One of 12 real-time PCR-positive cases for C. burnetii was devoid of histological lesions. None of the pathogens could be detected by IHC. CONCLUSION: Molecular detection by real-time PCR complemented by histopathological analysis is recommended to improve definitive diagnosis of bovine abortion cases and determine a more accurate prevalence of these zoonotic pathogens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-017-1294-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5712085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57120852017-12-06 Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria Vidal, Sara Kegler, Kristel Greub, Gilbert Aeby, Sebastien Borel, Nicole Dagleish, Mark P. Posthaus, Horst Perreten, Vincent Rodriguez-Campos, Sabrina BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydia abortus and Leptospira spp. are difficult to grow bacteria that play a role in bovine abortion, but their diagnosis is hampered by their obligate intracellular lifestyle (C. burnetii, C. abortus) or their lability (Leptospira spp.). Their importance is based on the contagious spread in food-producing animals, but also as zoonotic agents. In Switzerland, first-line routine bacteriological diagnostics in cattle abortions is regulated by national law and includes only basic screening by staining for C. burnetii due to the high costs associated with extended spectrum analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the true occurrence of these zoonotic pathogens in 249 cases of bovine abortion in Switzerland by serology (ELISA for anti-C. burnetii and C. abortus antibodies and microscopic agglutination test for anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies), molecular methods (real-time PCR and sequencing of PCR products of Chlamydiales-positive cases), Stamp’s modification of the Ziehl-Neelsen (mod-ZN) stain and, upon availability of material, by histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: After seroanalysis the prevalence was 15.9% for C. burnetii, 38.5% for C. abortus and 21.4% for Leptospira spp. By real-time PCR 12.1% and 16.9% of the cases were positive for C. burnetii and Chlamydiales, respectively, but only 2.4% were positive for C. burnetii or Chlamydiales by mod-ZN stain. Sequencing of PCR products of Chlamydiales-positive cases revealed C. abortus in 10% of cases and the presence of a mix of Chlamydiales-related bacteria in 5.2% of cases. Pathogenic Leptospira spp. were detected in 5.6% of cases. Inflammatory lesions were present histologically in all available samples which were real-time PCR-positive for Chlamydiales and Leptospira spp. One of 12 real-time PCR-positive cases for C. burnetii was devoid of histological lesions. None of the pathogens could be detected by IHC. CONCLUSION: Molecular detection by real-time PCR complemented by histopathological analysis is recommended to improve definitive diagnosis of bovine abortion cases and determine a more accurate prevalence of these zoonotic pathogens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-017-1294-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5712085/ /pubmed/29197401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1294-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vidal, Sara
Kegler, Kristel
Greub, Gilbert
Aeby, Sebastien
Borel, Nicole
Dagleish, Mark P.
Posthaus, Horst
Perreten, Vincent
Rodriguez-Campos, Sabrina
Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria
title Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria
title_full Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria
title_fullStr Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria
title_short Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria
title_sort neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1294-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vidalsara neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria
AT keglerkristel neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria
AT greubgilbert neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria
AT aebysebastien neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria
AT borelnicole neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria
AT dagleishmarkp neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria
AT posthaushorst neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria
AT perretenvincent neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria
AT rodriguezcampossabrina neglectedzoonoticagentsincattleabortiontacklingthedifficulttogrowbacteria