Cargando…

Outcomes of Zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies

BACKGROUND: Zika infection during pregnancy (ZIKVP) is known to be associated with adverse outcomes. Studies on this matter involve both rare outcomes and rare exposures and methodological choices are not straightforward. Cohort studies will surely offer more robust evidences, but their efficiency m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duarte, Elisabeth Carmen, Garcia, Leila Posenato, de Araújo, Wildo Navegantes, Velez, Maria P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4915-2
_version_ 1783283168020791296
author Duarte, Elisabeth Carmen
Garcia, Leila Posenato
de Araújo, Wildo Navegantes
Velez, Maria P.
author_facet Duarte, Elisabeth Carmen
Garcia, Leila Posenato
de Araújo, Wildo Navegantes
Velez, Maria P.
author_sort Duarte, Elisabeth Carmen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Zika infection during pregnancy (ZIKVP) is known to be associated with adverse outcomes. Studies on this matter involve both rare outcomes and rare exposures and methodological choices are not straightforward. Cohort studies will surely offer more robust evidences, but their efficiency must be enhanced. We aim to contribute to the debate on sample selection strategies in cohort studies to assess outcomes associated with ZKVP. MAIN BODY OF THE ABSTRACT: A study can be statistically more efficient than another if its estimates are more accurate (precise and valid), even if the studies involve the same number of subjects. Sample size and specific design strategies can enhance or impair the statistical efficiency of a study, depending on how the subjects are distributed in subgroups pertinent to the analysis. In most ZIKVP cohort studies to date there is an a priori identification of the source population (pregnant women, regardless of their exposure status) which is then sampled or included in its entirety (census). Subsequently, the group of pregnant women is classified according to exposure (presence or absence of ZIKVP), respecting the exposed:unexposed ratio in the source population. We propose that the sample selection be done from the a priori identification of groups of pregnant women exposed and unexposed to ZIKVP. This method will allow for an oversampling (even 100%) of the pregnant women with ZKVP and a optimized sampling from the general population of pregnant women unexposed to ZIKVP, saving resources in the unexposed group and improving the expected number of incident cases (outcomes) overall. CONCLUSION: We hope that this proposal will broaden the methodological debate on the improvement of statistical power and protocol harmonization of cohort studies that aim to evaluate the association between Zika infection during pregnancy and outcomes for the offspring, as well as those with similar objectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5712121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57121212017-12-06 Outcomes of Zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies Duarte, Elisabeth Carmen Garcia, Leila Posenato de Araújo, Wildo Navegantes Velez, Maria P. BMC Public Health Debate BACKGROUND: Zika infection during pregnancy (ZIKVP) is known to be associated with adverse outcomes. Studies on this matter involve both rare outcomes and rare exposures and methodological choices are not straightforward. Cohort studies will surely offer more robust evidences, but their efficiency must be enhanced. We aim to contribute to the debate on sample selection strategies in cohort studies to assess outcomes associated with ZKVP. MAIN BODY OF THE ABSTRACT: A study can be statistically more efficient than another if its estimates are more accurate (precise and valid), even if the studies involve the same number of subjects. Sample size and specific design strategies can enhance or impair the statistical efficiency of a study, depending on how the subjects are distributed in subgroups pertinent to the analysis. In most ZIKVP cohort studies to date there is an a priori identification of the source population (pregnant women, regardless of their exposure status) which is then sampled or included in its entirety (census). Subsequently, the group of pregnant women is classified according to exposure (presence or absence of ZIKVP), respecting the exposed:unexposed ratio in the source population. We propose that the sample selection be done from the a priori identification of groups of pregnant women exposed and unexposed to ZIKVP. This method will allow for an oversampling (even 100%) of the pregnant women with ZKVP and a optimized sampling from the general population of pregnant women unexposed to ZIKVP, saving resources in the unexposed group and improving the expected number of incident cases (outcomes) overall. CONCLUSION: We hope that this proposal will broaden the methodological debate on the improvement of statistical power and protocol harmonization of cohort studies that aim to evaluate the association between Zika infection during pregnancy and outcomes for the offspring, as well as those with similar objectives. BioMed Central 2017-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5712121/ /pubmed/29197364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4915-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Duarte, Elisabeth Carmen
Garcia, Leila Posenato
de Araújo, Wildo Navegantes
Velez, Maria P.
Outcomes of Zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies
title Outcomes of Zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies
title_full Outcomes of Zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies
title_fullStr Outcomes of Zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies
title_short Outcomes of Zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies
title_sort outcomes of zika virus infection during pregnancy: contributions to the debate on the efficiency of cohort studies
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4915-2
work_keys_str_mv AT duarteelisabethcarmen outcomesofzikavirusinfectionduringpregnancycontributionstothedebateontheefficiencyofcohortstudies
AT garcialeilaposenato outcomesofzikavirusinfectionduringpregnancycontributionstothedebateontheefficiencyofcohortstudies
AT dearaujowildonavegantes outcomesofzikavirusinfectionduringpregnancycontributionstothedebateontheefficiencyofcohortstudies
AT velezmariap outcomesofzikavirusinfectionduringpregnancycontributionstothedebateontheefficiencyofcohortstudies