Cargando…
Dose-response studies of Ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND: The sympathetic block of upper limb leading to increased blood flow has important clinical implication in microvascular surgery. However, little is known regarding the relationship between concentration of local anesthetic and blood flow of upper limb. The aim of this dose–response study...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0447-7 |
_version_ | 1783283184505454592 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ting Ye, Qiguang Wu, Daozhu Li, Jun Yu, Jingui |
author_facet | Li, Ting Ye, Qiguang Wu, Daozhu Li, Jun Yu, Jingui |
author_sort | Li, Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The sympathetic block of upper limb leading to increased blood flow has important clinical implication in microvascular surgery. However, little is known regarding the relationship between concentration of local anesthetic and blood flow of upper limb. The aim of this dose–response study was to determine the ED(50) and ED(95) of ropivacaine in blood flow after supraclavicular block (SB). METHODS: Patients undergoing upper limb surgery and supraclavicular block were randomly assigned to receive 30ml ropivacaine in concentrations of 0.125%(A Group), 0.2%(B Group), 0.25%(C Group), 0.375%(D Group), 0.5%(E Group), or 0.75%(F Group) (n=13 per group). All patients received supraclavicular block (SB). Time average maximum velocity (TAMAX), cross-sectional area (CSA) of brachial artery and skin temperatures (T(s)) were measured repeatedly at the same marked points, they were taken at baseline (before block, t(0)) and at 30min after SB (t(1)). Blood flow(BF) = TAMAX× CSA×60 sec.. Relative blood flow (ΔBF) = BF(t1)/ BF(t0). Success of SB was assessed simultaneously. Supplementary anesthesia and other adverse events (AE) were recorded. RESULTS: Significant increase in TAMAX, CSA, BF and T(s) were seen in all concentration groups at t(1) comparing with t(0) (P<0.001). There was an upward trend of TAMAX, CSA, BF with the increasing concentration of ropivacaine except T(s). There was no significant different of T(s) at t(1) among different concentration group. The dose-response formula of ropivacaine on ΔBF was Y=1+3.188/(1+10^((−2.451-X) × 1.730)) and ED(50)/ED(95) (95%CI) were 0.35/1.94%(0.25–0.45/0.83–4.52), and R(2) (coefficient of determination) =0.85. ED(50)/ED(95) (95%CI) values of sensory block were 0.18/0.33% (0.15–0.21/0.27–0.51), R(2)=0.904. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response curve between SB ropivacaine and the changes of BF was determined. The ED(50)/ED(95) of ropivacaine of ΔBF are 0.35/1.94% (0.25–0.45/0.83–4.52). TAMAX, CSA and BF consistently increased with ropivacaine concentration. The maximal sympathetic block needs higher concentration than that complete sensation block needs which may benefit for microvascular surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02139982. Retrospectively registered (Date of registration: May, 2014). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5712185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57121852017-12-06 Dose-response studies of Ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study Li, Ting Ye, Qiguang Wu, Daozhu Li, Jun Yu, Jingui BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The sympathetic block of upper limb leading to increased blood flow has important clinical implication in microvascular surgery. However, little is known regarding the relationship between concentration of local anesthetic and blood flow of upper limb. The aim of this dose–response study was to determine the ED(50) and ED(95) of ropivacaine in blood flow after supraclavicular block (SB). METHODS: Patients undergoing upper limb surgery and supraclavicular block were randomly assigned to receive 30ml ropivacaine in concentrations of 0.125%(A Group), 0.2%(B Group), 0.25%(C Group), 0.375%(D Group), 0.5%(E Group), or 0.75%(F Group) (n=13 per group). All patients received supraclavicular block (SB). Time average maximum velocity (TAMAX), cross-sectional area (CSA) of brachial artery and skin temperatures (T(s)) were measured repeatedly at the same marked points, they were taken at baseline (before block, t(0)) and at 30min after SB (t(1)). Blood flow(BF) = TAMAX× CSA×60 sec.. Relative blood flow (ΔBF) = BF(t1)/ BF(t0). Success of SB was assessed simultaneously. Supplementary anesthesia and other adverse events (AE) were recorded. RESULTS: Significant increase in TAMAX, CSA, BF and T(s) were seen in all concentration groups at t(1) comparing with t(0) (P<0.001). There was an upward trend of TAMAX, CSA, BF with the increasing concentration of ropivacaine except T(s). There was no significant different of T(s) at t(1) among different concentration group. The dose-response formula of ropivacaine on ΔBF was Y=1+3.188/(1+10^((−2.451-X) × 1.730)) and ED(50)/ED(95) (95%CI) were 0.35/1.94%(0.25–0.45/0.83–4.52), and R(2) (coefficient of determination) =0.85. ED(50)/ED(95) (95%CI) values of sensory block were 0.18/0.33% (0.15–0.21/0.27–0.51), R(2)=0.904. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response curve between SB ropivacaine and the changes of BF was determined. The ED(50)/ED(95) of ropivacaine of ΔBF are 0.35/1.94% (0.25–0.45/0.83–4.52). TAMAX, CSA and BF consistently increased with ropivacaine concentration. The maximal sympathetic block needs higher concentration than that complete sensation block needs which may benefit for microvascular surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02139982. Retrospectively registered (Date of registration: May, 2014). BioMed Central 2017-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5712185/ /pubmed/29197338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0447-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Ting Ye, Qiguang Wu, Daozhu Li, Jun Yu, Jingui Dose-response studies of Ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study |
title | Dose-response studies of Ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_full | Dose-response studies of Ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Dose-response studies of Ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose-response studies of Ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_short | Dose-response studies of Ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study |
title_sort | dose-response studies of ropivacaine in blood flow of upper extremity after supraclavicular block: a double-blind randomized controlled study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0447-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liting doseresponsestudiesofropivacaineinbloodflowofupperextremityaftersupraclavicularblockadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT yeqiguang doseresponsestudiesofropivacaineinbloodflowofupperextremityaftersupraclavicularblockadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT wudaozhu doseresponsestudiesofropivacaineinbloodflowofupperextremityaftersupraclavicularblockadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT lijun doseresponsestudiesofropivacaineinbloodflowofupperextremityaftersupraclavicularblockadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT yujingui doseresponsestudiesofropivacaineinbloodflowofupperextremityaftersupraclavicularblockadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy |