Cargando…
Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design
This discussion note does three things: (1) it explains the notion of ‘legal protection by design’ in relation to data-driven infrastructures that form the backbone of our new ‘onlife world’, (2) it explains how the notion of ‘by design’ relates to the relational nature of what an environment afford...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0299-0 |
_version_ | 1783283201611923456 |
---|---|
author | Hildebrandt, Mireille |
author_facet | Hildebrandt, Mireille |
author_sort | Hildebrandt, Mireille |
collection | PubMed |
description | This discussion note does three things: (1) it explains the notion of ‘legal protection by design’ in relation to data-driven infrastructures that form the backbone of our new ‘onlife world’, (2) it explains how the notion of ‘by design’ relates to the relational nature of what an environment affords its inhabitants, referring to the work of James Gibson, and (3) it explains how this affects our understanding of human capabilities in relation to the affordances of changing environments. Finally, this brief note argues that ‘safer by design’ in the case of nanotechnology will require legal protection by design to make sure that human capabilities are reinvented and sustained in nano-technical environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5712324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57123242017-12-11 Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design Hildebrandt, Mireille Nanoethics Critical Discussion Notes This discussion note does three things: (1) it explains the notion of ‘legal protection by design’ in relation to data-driven infrastructures that form the backbone of our new ‘onlife world’, (2) it explains how the notion of ‘by design’ relates to the relational nature of what an environment affords its inhabitants, referring to the work of James Gibson, and (3) it explains how this affects our understanding of human capabilities in relation to the affordances of changing environments. Finally, this brief note argues that ‘safer by design’ in the case of nanotechnology will require legal protection by design to make sure that human capabilities are reinvented and sustained in nano-technical environments. Springer Netherlands 2017-08-25 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5712324/ /pubmed/29238410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0299-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Critical Discussion Notes Hildebrandt, Mireille Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design |
title | Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design |
title_full | Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design |
title_fullStr | Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design |
title_full_unstemmed | Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design |
title_short | Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design |
title_sort | saved by design? the case of legal protection by design |
topic | Critical Discussion Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0299-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hildebrandtmireille savedbydesignthecaseoflegalprotectionbydesign |