Cargando…

Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design

This discussion note does three things: (1) it explains the notion of ‘legal protection by design’ in relation to data-driven infrastructures that form the backbone of our new ‘onlife world’, (2) it explains how the notion of ‘by design’ relates to the relational nature of what an environment afford...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hildebrandt, Mireille
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0299-0
_version_ 1783283201611923456
author Hildebrandt, Mireille
author_facet Hildebrandt, Mireille
author_sort Hildebrandt, Mireille
collection PubMed
description This discussion note does three things: (1) it explains the notion of ‘legal protection by design’ in relation to data-driven infrastructures that form the backbone of our new ‘onlife world’, (2) it explains how the notion of ‘by design’ relates to the relational nature of what an environment affords its inhabitants, referring to the work of James Gibson, and (3) it explains how this affects our understanding of human capabilities in relation to the affordances of changing environments. Finally, this brief note argues that ‘safer by design’ in the case of nanotechnology will require legal protection by design to make sure that human capabilities are reinvented and sustained in nano-technical environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5712324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57123242017-12-11 Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design Hildebrandt, Mireille Nanoethics Critical Discussion Notes This discussion note does three things: (1) it explains the notion of ‘legal protection by design’ in relation to data-driven infrastructures that form the backbone of our new ‘onlife world’, (2) it explains how the notion of ‘by design’ relates to the relational nature of what an environment affords its inhabitants, referring to the work of James Gibson, and (3) it explains how this affects our understanding of human capabilities in relation to the affordances of changing environments. Finally, this brief note argues that ‘safer by design’ in the case of nanotechnology will require legal protection by design to make sure that human capabilities are reinvented and sustained in nano-technical environments. Springer Netherlands 2017-08-25 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5712324/ /pubmed/29238410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0299-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Critical Discussion Notes
Hildebrandt, Mireille
Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design
title Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design
title_full Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design
title_fullStr Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design
title_full_unstemmed Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design
title_short Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design
title_sort saved by design? the case of legal protection by design
topic Critical Discussion Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0299-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hildebrandtmireille savedbydesignthecaseoflegalprotectionbydesign