Cargando…

Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols

BACKGROUND: This study cephalometrically compared the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes consequent to one and three-premolar extraction protocols of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment. METHODS: A sample of 126 lateral cephalometric radiographs from 63 patients was selected and divided i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janson, Guilherme, Lenza, Eduardo Beaton, Francisco, Rodolfo, Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron, Garib, Daniela, Lenza, Marcos Augusto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29199373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0193-x
_version_ 1783283229722148864
author Janson, Guilherme
Lenza, Eduardo Beaton
Francisco, Rodolfo
Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
Garib, Daniela
Lenza, Marcos Augusto
author_facet Janson, Guilherme
Lenza, Eduardo Beaton
Francisco, Rodolfo
Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
Garib, Daniela
Lenza, Marcos Augusto
author_sort Janson, Guilherme
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study cephalometrically compared the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes consequent to one and three-premolar extraction protocols of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment. METHODS: A sample of 126 lateral cephalometric radiographs from 63 patients was selected and divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 31 type 1 class II subdivision malocclusion patients treated with asymmetric extractions of two maxillary premolars and one mandibular premolar on the class I side, with an initial mean age of 13.58 years. Group 2 consisted of 32 type 2 class II subdivision malocclusion patients treated with asymmetric extraction of one maxillary first premolar on the class II side, with an initial mean age of 13.98 years. t test was used for intergroup comparison at the pre- and posttreatment stages and to compare the treatment changes. RESULTS: Group 1 had greater maxillomandibular sagittal discrepancy reduction and greater maxillary first molar extrusion. Group 2 had mandibular incisor labial inclination and protrusion, and group 1 had mandibular incisor lingual inclination and retraction. Maxillary molar asymmetry increased in group 2, while mandibular molar asymmetry increased in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment changes produced by these two class II subdivision protocols are different to adequately satisfy the different needs for types 1 and 2 class II subdivision malocclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5712505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57125052017-12-11 Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols Janson, Guilherme Lenza, Eduardo Beaton Francisco, Rodolfo Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron Garib, Daniela Lenza, Marcos Augusto Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: This study cephalometrically compared the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes consequent to one and three-premolar extraction protocols of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment. METHODS: A sample of 126 lateral cephalometric radiographs from 63 patients was selected and divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 31 type 1 class II subdivision malocclusion patients treated with asymmetric extractions of two maxillary premolars and one mandibular premolar on the class I side, with an initial mean age of 13.58 years. Group 2 consisted of 32 type 2 class II subdivision malocclusion patients treated with asymmetric extraction of one maxillary first premolar on the class II side, with an initial mean age of 13.98 years. t test was used for intergroup comparison at the pre- and posttreatment stages and to compare the treatment changes. RESULTS: Group 1 had greater maxillomandibular sagittal discrepancy reduction and greater maxillary first molar extrusion. Group 2 had mandibular incisor labial inclination and protrusion, and group 1 had mandibular incisor lingual inclination and retraction. Maxillary molar asymmetry increased in group 2, while mandibular molar asymmetry increased in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment changes produced by these two class II subdivision protocols are different to adequately satisfy the different needs for types 1 and 2 class II subdivision malocclusions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5712505/ /pubmed/29199373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0193-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Janson, Guilherme
Lenza, Eduardo Beaton
Francisco, Rodolfo
Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
Garib, Daniela
Lenza, Marcos Augusto
Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols
title Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols
title_full Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols
title_fullStr Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols
title_full_unstemmed Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols
title_short Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols
title_sort dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class ii subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29199373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0193-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jansonguilherme dentoskeletalandsofttissuechangesinclassiisubdivisiontreatmentwithasymmetricextractionprotocols
AT lenzaeduardobeaton dentoskeletalandsofttissuechangesinclassiisubdivisiontreatmentwithasymmetricextractionprotocols
AT franciscorodolfo dentoskeletalandsofttissuechangesinclassiisubdivisiontreatmentwithasymmetricextractionprotocols
AT aliagadelcastilloaron dentoskeletalandsofttissuechangesinclassiisubdivisiontreatmentwithasymmetricextractionprotocols
AT garibdaniela dentoskeletalandsofttissuechangesinclassiisubdivisiontreatmentwithasymmetricextractionprotocols
AT lenzamarcosaugusto dentoskeletalandsofttissuechangesinclassiisubdivisiontreatmentwithasymmetricextractionprotocols