Cargando…
Low Computational-Cost Footprint Deformities Diagnosis Sensor through Angles, Dimensions Analysis and Image Processing Techniques
Manual measurements of foot anthropometry can lead to errors since this task involves the experience of the specialist who performs them, resulting in different subjective measures from the same footprint. Moreover, some of the diagnoses that are given to classify a footprint deformity are based on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29165397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17112700 |
_version_ | 1783283325196042240 |
---|---|
author | Maestre-Rendon, J. Rodolfo Rivera-Roman, Tomas A. Sierra-Hernandez, Juan M. Cruz-Aceves, Ivan Contreras-Medina, Luis M. Duarte-Galvan, Carlos Fernandez-Jaramillo, Arturo A. |
author_facet | Maestre-Rendon, J. Rodolfo Rivera-Roman, Tomas A. Sierra-Hernandez, Juan M. Cruz-Aceves, Ivan Contreras-Medina, Luis M. Duarte-Galvan, Carlos Fernandez-Jaramillo, Arturo A. |
author_sort | Maestre-Rendon, J. Rodolfo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Manual measurements of foot anthropometry can lead to errors since this task involves the experience of the specialist who performs them, resulting in different subjective measures from the same footprint. Moreover, some of the diagnoses that are given to classify a footprint deformity are based on a qualitative interpretation by the physician; there is no quantitative interpretation of the footprint. The importance of providing a correct and accurate diagnosis lies in the need to ensure that an appropriate treatment is provided for the improvement of the patient without risking his or her health. Therefore, this article presents a smart sensor that integrates the capture of the footprint, a low computational-cost analysis of the image and the interpretation of the results through a quantitative evaluation. The smart sensor implemented required the use of a camera (Logitech C920) connected to a Raspberry Pi 3, where a graphical interface was made for the capture and processing of the image, and it was adapted to a podoscope conventionally used by specialists such as orthopedist, physiotherapists and podiatrists. The footprint diagnosis smart sensor (FPDSS) has proven to be robust to different types of deformity, precise, sensitive and correlated in 0.99 with the measurements from the digitalized image of the ink mat. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5713009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57130092017-12-07 Low Computational-Cost Footprint Deformities Diagnosis Sensor through Angles, Dimensions Analysis and Image Processing Techniques Maestre-Rendon, J. Rodolfo Rivera-Roman, Tomas A. Sierra-Hernandez, Juan M. Cruz-Aceves, Ivan Contreras-Medina, Luis M. Duarte-Galvan, Carlos Fernandez-Jaramillo, Arturo A. Sensors (Basel) Article Manual measurements of foot anthropometry can lead to errors since this task involves the experience of the specialist who performs them, resulting in different subjective measures from the same footprint. Moreover, some of the diagnoses that are given to classify a footprint deformity are based on a qualitative interpretation by the physician; there is no quantitative interpretation of the footprint. The importance of providing a correct and accurate diagnosis lies in the need to ensure that an appropriate treatment is provided for the improvement of the patient without risking his or her health. Therefore, this article presents a smart sensor that integrates the capture of the footprint, a low computational-cost analysis of the image and the interpretation of the results through a quantitative evaluation. The smart sensor implemented required the use of a camera (Logitech C920) connected to a Raspberry Pi 3, where a graphical interface was made for the capture and processing of the image, and it was adapted to a podoscope conventionally used by specialists such as orthopedist, physiotherapists and podiatrists. The footprint diagnosis smart sensor (FPDSS) has proven to be robust to different types of deformity, precise, sensitive and correlated in 0.99 with the measurements from the digitalized image of the ink mat. MDPI 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5713009/ /pubmed/29165397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17112700 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Maestre-Rendon, J. Rodolfo Rivera-Roman, Tomas A. Sierra-Hernandez, Juan M. Cruz-Aceves, Ivan Contreras-Medina, Luis M. Duarte-Galvan, Carlos Fernandez-Jaramillo, Arturo A. Low Computational-Cost Footprint Deformities Diagnosis Sensor through Angles, Dimensions Analysis and Image Processing Techniques |
title | Low Computational-Cost Footprint Deformities Diagnosis Sensor through Angles, Dimensions Analysis and Image Processing Techniques |
title_full | Low Computational-Cost Footprint Deformities Diagnosis Sensor through Angles, Dimensions Analysis and Image Processing Techniques |
title_fullStr | Low Computational-Cost Footprint Deformities Diagnosis Sensor through Angles, Dimensions Analysis and Image Processing Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Low Computational-Cost Footprint Deformities Diagnosis Sensor through Angles, Dimensions Analysis and Image Processing Techniques |
title_short | Low Computational-Cost Footprint Deformities Diagnosis Sensor through Angles, Dimensions Analysis and Image Processing Techniques |
title_sort | low computational-cost footprint deformities diagnosis sensor through angles, dimensions analysis and image processing techniques |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29165397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17112700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maestrerendonjrodolfo lowcomputationalcostfootprintdeformitiesdiagnosissensorthroughanglesdimensionsanalysisandimageprocessingtechniques AT riveraromantomasa lowcomputationalcostfootprintdeformitiesdiagnosissensorthroughanglesdimensionsanalysisandimageprocessingtechniques AT sierrahernandezjuanm lowcomputationalcostfootprintdeformitiesdiagnosissensorthroughanglesdimensionsanalysisandimageprocessingtechniques AT cruzacevesivan lowcomputationalcostfootprintdeformitiesdiagnosissensorthroughanglesdimensionsanalysisandimageprocessingtechniques AT contrerasmedinaluism lowcomputationalcostfootprintdeformitiesdiagnosissensorthroughanglesdimensionsanalysisandimageprocessingtechniques AT duartegalvancarlos lowcomputationalcostfootprintdeformitiesdiagnosissensorthroughanglesdimensionsanalysisandimageprocessingtechniques AT fernandezjaramilloarturoa lowcomputationalcostfootprintdeformitiesdiagnosissensorthroughanglesdimensionsanalysisandimageprocessingtechniques |