Cargando…
Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases
BACKGROUND: The functional and esthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxilla or posterior maxillary defect is often challenging. The aim of this study was to determine patient demographics, indications, success rate, and complications following the use of zygoma implants. MATERIALS AND M...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238374 |
_version_ | 1783283337059631104 |
---|---|
author | Agbara, Rowland Goetze, Elizabeth Koch, Felix Wagner, Wilfred |
author_facet | Agbara, Rowland Goetze, Elizabeth Koch, Felix Wagner, Wilfred |
author_sort | Agbara, Rowland |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The functional and esthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxilla or posterior maxillary defect is often challenging. The aim of this study was to determine patient demographics, indications, success rate, and complications following the use of zygoma implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who had zygoma implant placement in our clinic between 1998 and 2013 were retrospectively assessed for implant outcome. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 and Microsoft Excel 2007 test for significance (ρ) using Pearson's Chi-square (χ(2)) set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients consisting of 22 females (78.6%) and 6 males (21.4%) were treated, and their age ranged from 41 years to 83 years with a mean age of 60.3 ± 10.6 years. The main indication for zygoma implant placement was atrophic maxilla 12 (42.9%). In the prosthetic rehabilitation of the patients, 2 had epithetic prostheses, and 2 had obturators while 18 patients had conventional removable dental prostheses. Four patients (14.3%) had perimplantitis and one implant was accidentally placed into the maxillary sinus. A cumulative success rate of 88.1% was obtained from this retrospective analysis. CONCLUSION: A cumulative success rate of 88.1% reported in this study is lower than the reports from other studies. The difference in success rates may be related to different criteria for assessment of zygoma implant success and to the difference in inclusion criteria and follow-up period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5713059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57130592017-12-13 Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases Agbara, Rowland Goetze, Elizabeth Koch, Felix Wagner, Wilfred Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The functional and esthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxilla or posterior maxillary defect is often challenging. The aim of this study was to determine patient demographics, indications, success rate, and complications following the use of zygoma implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who had zygoma implant placement in our clinic between 1998 and 2013 were retrospectively assessed for implant outcome. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 and Microsoft Excel 2007 test for significance (ρ) using Pearson's Chi-square (χ(2)) set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients consisting of 22 females (78.6%) and 6 males (21.4%) were treated, and their age ranged from 41 years to 83 years with a mean age of 60.3 ± 10.6 years. The main indication for zygoma implant placement was atrophic maxilla 12 (42.9%). In the prosthetic rehabilitation of the patients, 2 had epithetic prostheses, and 2 had obturators while 18 patients had conventional removable dental prostheses. Four patients (14.3%) had perimplantitis and one implant was accidentally placed into the maxillary sinus. A cumulative success rate of 88.1% was obtained from this retrospective analysis. CONCLUSION: A cumulative success rate of 88.1% reported in this study is lower than the reports from other studies. The difference in success rates may be related to different criteria for assessment of zygoma implant success and to the difference in inclusion criteria and follow-up period. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5713059/ /pubmed/29238374 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Agbara, Rowland Goetze, Elizabeth Koch, Felix Wagner, Wilfred Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases |
title | Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases |
title_full | Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases |
title_fullStr | Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases |
title_short | Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases |
title_sort | zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: a review of 28 cases |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agbararowland zygomaimplantsinoralrehabilitationareviewof28cases AT goetzeelizabeth zygomaimplantsinoralrehabilitationareviewof28cases AT kochfelix zygomaimplantsinoralrehabilitationareviewof28cases AT wagnerwilfred zygomaimplantsinoralrehabilitationareviewof28cases |