Cargando…

Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases

BACKGROUND: The functional and esthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxilla or posterior maxillary defect is often challenging. The aim of this study was to determine patient demographics, indications, success rate, and complications following the use of zygoma implants. MATERIALS AND M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agbara, Rowland, Goetze, Elizabeth, Koch, Felix, Wagner, Wilfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238374
_version_ 1783283337059631104
author Agbara, Rowland
Goetze, Elizabeth
Koch, Felix
Wagner, Wilfred
author_facet Agbara, Rowland
Goetze, Elizabeth
Koch, Felix
Wagner, Wilfred
author_sort Agbara, Rowland
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The functional and esthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxilla or posterior maxillary defect is often challenging. The aim of this study was to determine patient demographics, indications, success rate, and complications following the use of zygoma implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who had zygoma implant placement in our clinic between 1998 and 2013 were retrospectively assessed for implant outcome. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 and Microsoft Excel 2007 test for significance (ρ) using Pearson's Chi-square (χ(2)) set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients consisting of 22 females (78.6%) and 6 males (21.4%) were treated, and their age ranged from 41 years to 83 years with a mean age of 60.3 ± 10.6 years. The main indication for zygoma implant placement was atrophic maxilla 12 (42.9%). In the prosthetic rehabilitation of the patients, 2 had epithetic prostheses, and 2 had obturators while 18 patients had conventional removable dental prostheses. Four patients (14.3%) had perimplantitis and one implant was accidentally placed into the maxillary sinus. A cumulative success rate of 88.1% was obtained from this retrospective analysis. CONCLUSION: A cumulative success rate of 88.1% reported in this study is lower than the reports from other studies. The difference in success rates may be related to different criteria for assessment of zygoma implant success and to the difference in inclusion criteria and follow-up period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5713059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57130592017-12-13 Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases Agbara, Rowland Goetze, Elizabeth Koch, Felix Wagner, Wilfred Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The functional and esthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxilla or posterior maxillary defect is often challenging. The aim of this study was to determine patient demographics, indications, success rate, and complications following the use of zygoma implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who had zygoma implant placement in our clinic between 1998 and 2013 were retrospectively assessed for implant outcome. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 and Microsoft Excel 2007 test for significance (ρ) using Pearson's Chi-square (χ(2)) set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients consisting of 22 females (78.6%) and 6 males (21.4%) were treated, and their age ranged from 41 years to 83 years with a mean age of 60.3 ± 10.6 years. The main indication for zygoma implant placement was atrophic maxilla 12 (42.9%). In the prosthetic rehabilitation of the patients, 2 had epithetic prostheses, and 2 had obturators while 18 patients had conventional removable dental prostheses. Four patients (14.3%) had perimplantitis and one implant was accidentally placed into the maxillary sinus. A cumulative success rate of 88.1% was obtained from this retrospective analysis. CONCLUSION: A cumulative success rate of 88.1% reported in this study is lower than the reports from other studies. The difference in success rates may be related to different criteria for assessment of zygoma implant success and to the difference in inclusion criteria and follow-up period. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5713059/ /pubmed/29238374 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agbara, Rowland
Goetze, Elizabeth
Koch, Felix
Wagner, Wilfred
Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases
title Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases
title_full Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases
title_fullStr Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases
title_full_unstemmed Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases
title_short Zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: A review of 28 cases
title_sort zygoma implants in oral rehabilitation: a review of 28 cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238374
work_keys_str_mv AT agbararowland zygomaimplantsinoralrehabilitationareviewof28cases
AT goetzeelizabeth zygomaimplantsinoralrehabilitationareviewof28cases
AT kochfelix zygomaimplantsinoralrehabilitationareviewof28cases
AT wagnerwilfred zygomaimplantsinoralrehabilitationareviewof28cases